|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Daddrobit
You Can Call Me Daddy
1
   |
Posted - 2015.07.20 13:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
My list of good:
-Current LP payouts for wins and losses
-Current ISK payouts for wins and losses
-Each faction having a unique equipment that is "optimal"
-Each faction having a specialist weapon with slightly lower fitting cost, I feel that is acceptable balance wise
My list of bad:
-Able to have positive standings for all factions if played right
-Not enough incentive for EVE pilots to -want- to help the ground troops
-No standing gain at all if you suffer a loss
-Some factions have way more variety in stock, mostly focused on vehicles here
-We have an equipment and a weapon specialist, but I'd also like to see a specialist defensive module
My list of desires:
-Heavy hits for playing for a different faction. Win for one and gain 75 standings, but lose 150 for the other
-Gain 25 points in standing for a loss
-Make ground battles more impactful on EVE control and increase LP gain for dropping OBs
-Have an LP trade system like .75 gained for every 1 you trade away to allow everyone access to the full assortment of items without having to add every item to every store
-Add a Specialist defensive module for each faction. Gallente Armor rep with base 9 reps, Caldari Shield extender with base 80 HP, something like that.
-Possibly expand the specialist weapon variety. This isn't top priority at all, but I wouldn't mind having a specialist Allotek PLC
O.G. Pink Fluffy Bunny
|
Daddrobit
You Can Call Me Daddy
1
|
Posted - 2015.07.20 21:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Middas Betancore wrote:Also as for the LP exchange concept
Not bad but kinda can be sidestepped if we can simply trade gear
I think the trading solution is more interesting, but that's just me
Why not both?
O.G. Pink Fluffy Bunny
|
Daddrobit
You Can Call Me Daddy
1
|
Posted - 2015.07.20 22:39:00 -
[3] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:Daddrobit wrote:Middas Betancore wrote:Also as for the LP exchange concept
Not bad but kinda can be sidestepped if we can simply trade gear
I think the trading solution is more interesting, but that's just me Why not both? Because exchanging LP hurts the trade mechanic. Supply and demand is affected if everyone can get what they want on their own. If you want something buy or trade for it. It is how things work in New Eden.
I would agree with you if the trading system was as robust as it is in EVE.
However what we have is cumbersome and entirely unreliable. Not to mention you're completely locked out of gear if you just happen to not know anyone with the gear that's willing to part with it.
Let the traders trade what they can to the people who can't play FW enough to save up enough to comfortably take that conversion loss, and let the guys who are willing to grind it out, grind it out.
O.G. Pink Fluffy Bunny
|
|
|
| |
|