The brick fit may come into play after you implement another slot on commandos.

As of now, the heaviest possible bricked Cal commandos will be faster than any tier Amarr Assault with two plates on it because calmandos only have 1 low slot.

A max bricked Minando will be faster than any Amarr Assault with 2 identical plates, because proto minandos have two low slots. Other wise any adv/standard minando will be faster than any tier Amarr suit with 2 plates.

Proto Galmando with three low slots bricked may be on par via speed with an Amarr assault that dedicates 3 slots to eHP but have superior reps. ADV galmando will be faster than any amarr assault

Unbricked amarr assaults will certainly be slower than max bricked adv/standard commandos, and most likeley be slower than two max bricked proto commandos. IMO its bit unbalanced, especially for a race thats supposed to stack HP.

I can tell that i'm gettin a bit too back-and-forth with this. Delving into hypothertical situations a bit much. Feedback doesn't mean debating your work. Concerning assaults i got some faith in ya.

It will just need a comparision with your brick tanked chart. See how fast each suit can move tanked, and then polish of any edges.

Slayer logi with 3 or 4 compact nanohives?

Make all equipment slots mandatory + increase CPU/PG fitting bonuses for logis + reduce CPU/PG for logis = plenty of CPU/PG for equipment but not much left for brick tanking and proto weaponry.

No, you're not. You're contradicting my claim by using terrible examples, shoddy results, and cherry picked data. You're not doing anything beneficial here except for trolling - per the norm - and trying to institute this superiority complex that somehow everyone is trying to infringe on what you do because #reasons, ignoring the fact that if they wanted to they would have already. What's worse is you're not doing it for any particular reason other than to simply -be contradictory- because there is absolutely nothing to gain from this argument besides your personal satisfaction that someone might buy into your -100000000/10 troll.

In either case, your argument has -absolutely nothing to do- with Assault speed as a whole because the issue of the Minmatar Assault 'heavy scout' has only arisen recently after it received a buff whereas every other Assault hasn't seen changes since 1.7 and has yet to follow suite in what you would have us believe is an epidemic of players running around with 900 EHP dual-tanked suits and kin-cats to put them at 9m/s, yet in another thread go on to complain that brick tanking is a problem because armor plates are the most bought item.

You can't decide which you want to go with because there is absolutely no validity to either claim: Either players are running speedy/high EHP dual-tank suits or they're running slow, brick-tanked armor suits. Pick one and stick with it less you look even more like a fool.

Rattati, I beg of you: Adjust eHP instead of speed for assault if they don't fit on the curve. They've needed an HP nerf for a while. Don't screw with their mobility though. That would be like giving the scrambler rifle ridiculous kick or something to balance it, instead of just nerfing the damage a tiny bit.

HP is the problem here, and I can personally promise that.

I was hoping logis would keep the proposed speeds, or at least be as fast as assaults. I guess these revisions are acceptable though.

Except for when they were, right?

Yeah, but thats what dust is about. Heavy snipers, fast assaults, fast heavies, tanked scouts.

Beat me to it, so...... This ^