- Reduce effectiveness or fitting capability of Heavy Armor Repairers and Heavy Shield Boosters
- Increase effectiveness of vehicle-oriented repair tools
- Introduce remote shield booster equipment
- Re-introduce WP rewards for repairing vehicles
- Re-emphasize HAV and SHAV roles through above changes, offering drastically different playstyles to each instead of minor differences in fitting

Proposed changes theoretically encourage more infantry <-> vehicle cohesion as a circumstance with tankers relying more on infantry for reps while offering their own force projection for said infantry. This reduces individually powerful tanks that have the best of everything and puts an emphasis on team-play where associated while SHAVs can be balanced to provide high-damage attacks of opportunity.

Solo Tankers are still able to get high-end reps if they want to run Logistics in their own vehicle but must take the risks associated with it instead of just bricking out a Heavy and bailing to kill AV when they're about to lose their vehicle.

Discuss.

nerf Armor hardener to 30%, put a penalty on stacking repairs. Buff shield booster so that they give more HP/Min than the Armor hardeners. Reduce crazy shield hardener fitting costs. Reduce mentally thought out fiting costs of heavy boosters. Buff Missiles to 300 RoF.

Gåæ = balance.

nerf Armor hardener to 30%, put a penalty on stacking repairs. Buff shield booster so that they give more HP/Min than the Armor hardeners. Reduce crazy shield hardener fitting costs. Reduce mentally thought out fiting costs of heavy boosters. Buff Missiles to 300 RoF.

Gåæ = balance.

- Reduce effectiveness or fitting capability of Heavy Armor Repairers and Heavy Shield Boosters
- Increase effectiveness of vehicle-oriented repair tools
- Introduce remote shield booster equipment
- Re-introduce WP rewards for repairing vehicles
- Re-emphasize HAV and SHAV roles through above changes, offering drastically different playstyles to each instead of minor differences in fitting

Proposed changes theoretically encourage more infantry <-> vehicle cohesion as a circumstance with tankers relying more on infantry for reps while offering their own force projection for said infantry. This reduces individually powerful tanks that have the best of everything and puts an emphasis on team-play where associated while SHAVs can be balanced to provide high-damage attacks of opportunity.

Solo Tankers are still able to get high-end reps if they want to run Logistics in their own vehicle but must take the risks associated with it instead of just bricking out a Heavy and bailing to kill AV when they're about to lose their vehicle.

Discuss.

- Reduce effectiveness or fitting capability of Heavy Armor Repairers and Heavy Shield Boosters
- Increase effectiveness of vehicle-oriented repair tools
- Introduce remote shield booster equipment
- Re-introduce WP rewards for repairing vehicles
- Re-emphasize HAV and SHAV roles through above changes, offering drastically different playstyles to each instead of minor differences in fitting

Proposed changes theoretically encourage more infantry <-> vehicle cohesion as a circumstance with tankers relying more on infantry for reps while offering their own force projection for said infantry. This reduces individually powerful tanks that have the best of everything and puts an emphasis on team-play where associated while SHAVs can be balanced to provide high-damage attacks of opportunity.

Solo Tankers are still able to get high-end reps if they want to run Logistics in their own vehicle but must take the risks associated with it instead of just bricking out a Heavy and bailing to kill AV when they're about to lose their vehicle.

Discuss.

Cost

Assault capabilities

Defensive capabilities


pick 2

- Reduce effectiveness or fitting capability of Heavy Armor Repairers and Heavy Shield Boosters
- Increase effectiveness of vehicle-oriented repair tools
- Introduce remote shield booster equipment
- Re-introduce WP rewards for repairing vehicles
- Re-emphasize HAV and SHAV roles through above changes, offering drastically different playstyles to each instead of minor differences in fitting

Proposed changes theoretically encourage more infantry <-> vehicle cohesion as a circumstance with tankers relying more on infantry for reps while offering their own force projection for said infantry. This reduces individually powerful tanks that have the best of everything and puts an emphasis on team-play where associated while SHAVs can be balanced to provide high-damage attacks of opportunity.

Solo Tankers are still able to get high-end reps if they want to run Logistics in their own vehicle but must take the risks associated with it instead of just bricking out a Heavy and bailing to kill AV when they're about to lose their vehicle.

Discuss.

Shield boosters are hands down the worst cost/benefit modules in the game. I don't think anyone really uses them, because they suck amazingly. Nerfing them (when they cost more to fit than any other shield mod and provide the least benefit) strikes me as counterproductive.

Cool story bro, does absolutely nothing to encourage a symbiotic relationship between infantry and tankers and just retains individual power among tankers themselves.

Give me a reason to help tankers, give tankers a reason to help me - don't just make them separate entities because that has never worked. We don't need more solo-slayers.