DUST Search - Logistics and HAV Theorycrafting

Aeon Amadi wrote:

Sir Dukey wrote:

Aeon Amadi wrote:

- Reduce effectiveness or fitting capability of Heavy Armor Repairers and Heavy Shield Boosters
- Increase effectiveness of vehicle-oriented repair tools
- Introduce remote shield booster equipment
- Re-introduce WP rewards for repairing vehicles
- Re-emphasize HAV and SHAV roles through above changes, offering drastically different playstyles to each instead of minor differences in fitting

Proposed changes theoretically encourage more infantry <-> vehicle cohesion as a circumstance with tankers relying more on infantry for reps while offering their own force projection for said infantry. This reduces individually powerful tanks that have the best of everything and puts an emphasis on team-play where associated while SHAVs can be balanced to provide high-damage attacks of opportunity.

Solo Tankers are still able to get high-end reps if they want to run Logistics in their own vehicle but must take the risks associated with it instead of just bricking out a Heavy and bailing to kill AV when they're about to lose their vehicle.

Discuss.

nerf Armor hardener to 30%, put a penalty on stacking repairs. Buff shield booster so that they give more HP/Min than the Armor hardeners. Reduce crazy shield hardener fitting costs. Reduce mentally thought out fiting costs of heavy boosters. Buff Missiles to 300 RoF.

Gåæ = balance.

Cool story bro, does absolutely nothing to encourage a symbiotic relationship between infantry and tankers and just retains individual power among tankers themselves.

Give me a reason to help tankers, give tankers a reason to help me - don't just make them separate entities because that has never worked. We don't need more solo-slayers.

Death is a serious businessGÇª So is running a shoddy, half-baked game company.

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Operative 1174 Uuali Y.A.M.A.H 645	Posted - 2015.05.07 03:17:00 - [1] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: - Reduce effectiveness or fitting capability of Heavy Armor Repairers and Heavy Shield Boosters - Increase effectiveness of vehicle-oriented repair tools - Introduce remote shield booster equipment - Re-introduce WP rewards for repairing vehicles - Re-emphasize HAV and SHAV roles through above changes, offering drastically different playstyles to each instead of minor differences in fitting Proposed changes theoretically encourage more infantry <-> vehicle cohesion as a circumstance with tankers relying more on infantry for reps while offering their own force projection for said infantry. This reduces individually powerful tanks that have the best of everything and puts an emphasis on team-play where associated while SHAVs can be balanced to provide high-damage attacks of opportunity. Solo Tankers are still able to get high-end reps if they want to run Logistics in their own vehicle but must take the risks associated with it instead of just bricking out a Heavy and bailing to kill AV when they're about to lose their vehicle. Discuss. nerf Armor hardener to 30%, put a penalty on stacking repairs. Buff shield booster so that they give more HP/Min than the Armor hardeners. Reduce crazy shield hardener fitting costs. Reduce mentally thought out fiting costs of heavy boosters. Buff Missiles to 300 RoF. Gåæ = balance. Cool story bro, does absolutely nothing to encourage a symbiotic relationship between infantry and tankers and just retains individual power among tankers themselves. Give me a reason to help tankers, give tankers a reason to help me - don't just make them separate entities because that has never worked. We don't need more solo-slayers. He said it GÇô massive WP for reps. BOOM! I guess free aurum would be a bonus. Infantry can already benefit from tanks if tankers would take advantage of it. mCRU WPs, scans, a mobile wall for cover, small turrets to fire and a seat to hide in, a bigger gun to shoot infantry and a means of removing the enemy tank who's firing on you. Death is a serious businessGÇª So is running a shoddy, half-baked game company.