|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
18625
   |
Posted - 2015.04.29 22:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
NO MINA CHANGE THE NAME. It must be The Manufactory!
By the way while I support your initiative you an I both know and agreed that this will not work because as tankers we hate all other vehicle pilots with a burning passion.
"MIN MAXING! MIN MAXING! I'M BETTER AT IT THAN YOU!"
- Mobius Wyvern
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
18627
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 23:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
Megaman Trigger wrote:True Adamance wrote:NO MINA CHANGE THE NAME. It must be The Manufactory! Manufactorum?
Praise the Omnissiah!
I think the term is still Manufactory of the singular structure.
Manufactory - Single
Manufactoria - Plural
Manufactorum - Grouping of Manufactoria ?
"MIN MAXING! MIN MAXING! I'M BETTER AT IT THAN YOU!"
- Mobius Wyvern
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
18643
|
Posted - 2015.04.30 20:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:I'm against Manufactorum simply because we don't make the vehicles. We drive them. Legio Machina isn't too bad though. That said I was kind of looking at it like "Dust was supposed to be about the footprints in sand/dust representing infantry... have you seen what heavy treads do to sand?" Basically if infantry are this then we are this
Except Legio implies unity which we don't have.
"MIN MAXING! MIN MAXING! I'M BETTER AT IT THAN YOU!"
- Mobius Wyvern
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
18644
|
Posted - 2015.04.30 21:58:00 -
[4] - Quote
Megaman Trigger wrote:True Adamance wrote:MINA Longstrike wrote:I'm against Manufactorum simply because we don't make the vehicles. We drive them. Legio Machina isn't too bad though. That said I was kind of looking at it like "Dust was supposed to be about the footprints in sand/dust representing infantry... have you seen what heavy treads do to sand?" Basically if infantry are this then we are this Except Legio implies unity which we don't have. What you lack in unity, you make up for in firepower.
Touch+¬
"MIN MAXING! MIN MAXING! I'M BETTER AT IT THAN YOU!"
- Mobius Wyvern
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
18735
|
Posted - 2015.05.05 03:13:00 -
[5] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:So, point of discussion: How do you guys feel about CPU/PG chips?
Personally I loathe them, they feel like a slot tax in that in order to create a 'competitive' fit for a few dropsuits and a ton of vehicles you have to fit a cpu/pg chip, I'd much rather fits be balanced around not having these things rather than there being a few outlier fits that were 'too good' so they got slapped with mandatory useless slots.
Prior to the most recent rebalancing I would always use one on my Caldari HAV and have no complaints with it since it effectively allowed me to run one of the most powerful fits possible prior to the rebalance.
I loathed using one on the Gallente HAV, and I needed a CPU extended for the Maddy to run my FW Mobile Bunker fittings, because it crippled the Madrugars ability to tank worth a damn vs single Pilot Madrugars.
Post rebalance I really can't comment on Caldari HAV since I do not have any SP in them any longer however I had no issues when I did making use of one fitting module as nothing else more valuable could fit there and using one allowed me more primary tank from the high slots.
However you and I both know that Shield fitting requirement are a bit jacked right now and the Regulator is in the High Slot and not the Low Slot like it should be.
I still prefer Caldari Tanks over Gallentean ones for aesthetics, handling, and general premise since I feel they actually tank actively unlike the Gallente one which tanks passively with the efficiency of an Active Tank.
Hopefully if those fitting disparities are rolled back, armour reppers shift to short duration active modules, and Shield Booster could provide a 1 second invuln to ensure that the 1950 shields were regened I think the Caldari HAV could be really competitive in Tank vs Tank gameplay.
However Tank vs Infantry I wholly believe the Shield HAV is the better choice being able to more easily manipulate its HP, has better handling, and resists swarms and forges slightly better.
"MIN MAXING! MIN MAXING! I'M BETTER AT IT THAN YOU!"
- Mobius Wyvern
|
|
|
| |
|