DUST Search - Alternate proposal on trading restrictions at Loyalty Rank 4

All Channels

General Discussions

Alternate proposal on trading restrictions at Loyalty Rank 4

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Aero Yassavi Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 9665	Posted - 2015.04.15 05:54:00 - [1] - Quote How about instead of allowing no trading at all, we allow ISK based items (and their Aurum equivalents) to be tradeable from the start, and then everything else at loyalty rank 4? CCP rightfully anticipated exploits such as using alts to give you extra warbarge component production, experimental weapon production, the free booster from the recruitment link, and all the free stuff from the newsletters (omega boosters and officer weapons). But not allowing new players to trade at all is off putting and not ideal for the NPE. This proposal should fix that. Am I overlooking an exploit? Amarr are the good guys Join "PIE Ground Control" for secure Amarr FW syncing and orbital support
Jadek Menaheim Xer Cloud Consortium 5769	Posted - 2015.04.15 06:14:00 - [2] - Quote Newsletter rewards are sort of an exploit...except that requires having played the long con. @JadekMenaheim
JL3Eleven Ancient Exiles. 2282	Posted - 2015.04.15 06:16:00 - [3] - Quote Aero Yassavi wrote: How about instead of allowing no trading at all, we allow ISK based items (and their Aurum equivalents) to be tradeable from the start, and then everything else at loyalty rank 4? CCP rightfully anticipated exploits such as using alts to give you extra warbarge component production, experimental weapon production, the free booster from the recruitment link, and all the free stuff from the newsletters (omega boosters and officer weapons). But not allowing new players to trade at all is off putting and not ideal for the NPE. This proposal should fix that. Am I overlooking an exploit? Real question: What would someone with ISK want with ISK based items? TBH, I'd rather buy it from the market than mess with someone. Can I haz ur ISK? Do you have officer gear or rare items to sell or trade? Message me in game with details.
JL3Eleven Ancient Exiles. 2282	Posted - 2015.04.15 06:17:00 - [4] - Quote Jadek Menaheim wrote: Newsletter rewards are sort of an exploit...except that requires having played the long con. Can I haz ur ISK? Do you have officer gear or rare items to sell or trade? Message me in game with details.
Jadek Menaheim Xer Cloud Consortium 5769	Posted - 2015.04.15 06:18:00 - [5] - Quote @JL3Eleven They originally had the idea that they could undercut the NPC vendor with bulk orders. @JadekMenaheim
JL3Eleven Ancient Exiles. 2286	Posted - 2015.04.15 06:28:00 - [6] - Quote Jadek Menaheim wrote: @JL3Eleven They originally had the idea that they could undercut the NPC vendor with bulk orders. Yea I'm totally aware, buy why bother for such a small sum? P.S. I would like to talk to you regarding the "future". Message me when your available. Can I haz ur ISK? Do you have officer gear or rare items to sell or trade? Message me in game with details.
Meisterjager Jagermeister 854	Posted - 2015.04.15 06:44:00 - [7] - Quote I think I have missed something. What is this "the trading restrictions at Loyalty Rank 4" of which you speak? AKA - StarVenger- Horizons' Edge
Aero Yassavi Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 9678	Posted - 2015.04.15 15:05:00 - [8] - Quote What if it's a new player who joined a corp and a corp mate has a stash of suits from salvage that the new player could use? Hmm this makes me thing a new player should receive trades regardless just not trade. Maybe that's how it is? Amarr are the good guys Join "PIE Ground Control" for secure Amarr FW syncing and orbital support
Joel II X Bacon with a bottle of Quafe 7068	Posted - 2015.04.15 15:06:00 - [9] - Quote Loyalty Rank 2?
Aero Yassavi Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 9678	Posted - 2015.04.15 15:08:00 - [10] - Quote Joel II X wrote: Loyalty Rank 2? Too easy Amarr are the good guys Join "PIE Ground Control" for secure Amarr FW syncing and orbital support

Regnier Feros Pielords 303	Posted - 2015.04.15 16:08:00 - [11] - Quote Aero Yassavi wrote: Joel II X wrote: Loyalty Rank 2? Too easy Faction standing lvl 2 "You're like a she-male.. hates gym, doesn't know how to be alpha.. you'll stay in the friendzone for life" -Senpai
Roy Ventus Axis of Chaos 1932	Posted - 2015.04.15 16:16:00 - [12] - Quote Are loyalty points passively gained? Because they should be. And whenever they do something game-breakingly illegal, they get a temp halt on their Loyalty points? But ehh... What if players get taxed on these simple tradings based on their loyalty, with level 4 being the 0% tax? Edit: It doesn't have to be by percentage. Could just be an actual amount of ISK. Lvl 1 - 2000 ISK, Lvl 2 - 1000 ISK, Lvl 3 - 500 ISK, Lvl 4 - 0 ISK. I can see why this might be an issue but at the same damn time, players are already getting screwed out of trading. "There once was a time when there wasn't a Roy Ventus and it wasn't much of a time at all." http://royventus.tumblr.com
Nestil Nos Nothi 219	Posted - 2015.04.15 16:36:00 - [13] - Quote A s someone else already suggested: how about active player trading? So when someone sends an item the other must accept it or it will not be send...
Aero Yassavi Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 9681	Posted - 2015.04.15 17:22:00 - [14] - Quote Nestil wrote: A s someone else already suggested: how about active player trading? So when someone sends an item the other must accept it or it will not be send... So abandon that rank 4 crap ( or reduce it to lvl 2) and bring active player trading.... But then what about legitimate siblings/roommates who share a PS3? Restricting what can be traded by rank seems more full proof Amarr are the good guys Join "PIE Ground Control" for secure Amarr FW syncing and orbital support
Nestil Nos Nothi 219	Posted - 2015.04.16 04:13:00 - [15] - Quote Aero Yassavi wrote: Nestil wrote: A s someone else already suggested: how about active player trading? So when someone sends an item the other must accept it or it will not be send... So abandon that rank 4 crap ( or reduce it to lvl 2) and bring active player trading.... But then what about legitimate siblings/roommates who share a PS3? Restricting what can be traded by rank seems more full proof Yeah except that even though I play dust since chromosome and have 27k kills I'm still sitting with loyalty rank 3 with 6300 points missing for you the next rank....well which excludes me from trading as whole.
Apocalyptic Destroyer L.O.T.I.S. 416	Posted - 2015.04.16 04:17:00 - [16] - Quote Loyalty Rank at 4 is perfectly fine. Stop Complaining, Stop B*&%$ing !!! God Man !!! You guys are lucky enough to even have trading allowed. True Amarr In Disguise Pain is Weakness Leaving the Body. In his house at R'lyeh dead Cthulhu waits dreaming.
Adipem Nothi Nos Nothi 8774	Posted - 2015.04.16 04:17:00 - [17] - Quote Aero Yassavi wrote: Am I overlooking an exploit? I can't think of any other exploits. Shoot scout with yes. - Ripley Riley


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.