Dear players,

I want to give a short update on what's happening with Matchmaking.

TLDR; it's working, and it's definitely pitting similar players together. We will share more data once we have collected a full 24 hour cycle from DT to DT.

There is a slight increase in queue time, but that was intended as we are certain players will want to wait up to 120 seconds for a good match, instead of 45 for a bad one. Compared to competitors and ladder/ranked gameplay games like BF/LoL, waiting time can be up to 10 minutes in the higher brackets. Again something we can tune, from now on.

We have been messing around with settings all day and none of them have broken anything, the logic is very stable and issue-free.

We are tuning the minimum teamsize to start games, and also the status of a running game, and whether to refill or simply let it die since it is already lost. There is an unresolved issue of big strong squads leaving battles. If this continues, we may have to figure out a way to "stop" that behaviour.

A few reports of uneven sides, which is to be expected.

Complaints of redlining are 1) anecdotal, if we trust our metrics, and 2) will continue to happen, just not as often against new players. The logic uses a Mu_threshold to split the playerbase into two queues, above and below that Mu_threshold. Players below should NOT be fighting players above, unless in extreme cases such as absolutely no other players can be found to start a new battle, or no eligible refill battle can be found.

I look forward to sharing more data, such as average Mu variation per battle, showing that more similar Mu players are fighting each other, and hopefully, that the winning margins are overall getting lower. That is the real indicator of more balanced matches, that the winning Ambush team was on average less clones than before, and the winning Skirm/Dom team, has less MCC health remaining, indicating that the match was closer than before.

Happy hunting