|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3155
   |
Posted - 2015.04.01 16:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
Luther Mandrix wrote:Mary Sedillo wrote:With the introduction of tiers of tanks of ever increasing price, the JLAV is still too effective for the price.
One person in a cheap lav loaded to the gills with remotes. Think about that.
OHKO.
This severely hurts vehicle operators who have invested millions of SP and ISK.
Push on the point? Going good. AV is hurting you as par the course, then BOOM
JLAV hits and you are done. How should it do that? Why is that right?
It isn't.
CCP needs to make it where friendly vehicles cannot have friendly REs on them.
Problem fixed. LAV go boom ,had half its hp removed and has Res that you as a tanker can detonate.And your teams small arms fire can detonate the Res .I don't see a problem.
You lose 3mil ISK in tanks in one match to the same person driving a jihad jeep around, then come on here and tell us how you feel about it.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3155
|
Posted - 2015.04.01 16:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
Yeeeuuuupppp wrote:Mary Sedillo wrote:Yeeeuuuupppp wrote:Pay attention. Viable tactic. Working as intended. Allah Akbar Definitely not a valid tactic on the ISK ratio of your vehicles cost + suit vs tank and crew. I pay plenty of attention. Its how I faceroll most other tankers. But, do you play in a squad that will call out the jihad? Do you use a scanner and see the fuckton of remotes moving towards you? They made people have to get creative with jihad jeeps since the bandwidth change. This may be a tad bias but something has to kill those invincible madrugars, no?
We don't always have the room for a scanner.
It's usually me and Taka rolling around together, either me in his tank or we both have one. Neither of us can use a scanner because we can't lose an offensive or defensive module slot. I like railguns, despite how insanely buggy they can be. I obviously can't use a scanner, because I need to make my turret better with modules.
Maybe we should start doing tank squads again. A missile, a railgun, 4 blasters.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3157
|
Posted - 2015.04.02 15:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
Outlaw OneZero wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
You lose 3mil ISK in tanks in one match to the same person driving a jihad jeep around, then come on here and tell us how you feel about it.
Why are you risking 3 mil in assets without proper infantry support to keep AV off of you?
A veteran pilot in one of the seats is more than enough. I don't get kicked out for staring at the map, which makes me half useless to begin with.
As far as 3mil ISK, what are we supposed to do? Sit at our redline and wait for something to come around to shoot at? You guys complain about that.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3157
|
Posted - 2015.04.02 15:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mary Sedillo wrote:True Adamance wrote:CommanderBolt wrote:You may have an argument in terms of risk vs reward, what with blueprints being free and all. However the tactic itself is sound and should remain viable.
We are clones, we do not need to have the same regard for life like most mortals. Only Isk / Resources are your limit. Except in many cases there is not ISK cost. BPO suit [Apex Minmatar] and BPO vehicle [Blood Raider Saga]. I'd be fine if players were investing ISK into their vehicle and suit but as it is it's a 0 ISK fit destroying a 1.2 Million ISK tank. Not saying it shouldn't happen but in this instance there is no risk on the JLAVer's part. Indeed! I've been accumulating SP since release to get my tank where it is and I get popped like nothing by a no risk or isk tactic? Its ridiculous. Easy fix is make it where remotes won't stick on friendly vehicles.
I don't want them to stick to vehicles at all. It was a "bug" when first discovered. Someone made a token response saying they were going to look into it, then it became working as intended when nobody said anything after a while. If they're not going to look at it, the least they could do is say so.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
3157
|
Posted - 2015.04.02 15:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
Rowdy Railgunner wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Luther Mandrix wrote:Mary Sedillo wrote:With the introduction of tiers of tanks of ever increasing price, the JLAV is still too effective for the price.
One person in a cheap lav loaded to the gills with remotes. Think about that.
OHKO.
This severely hurts vehicle operators who have invested millions of SP and ISK.
Push on the point? Going good. AV is hurting you as par the course, then BOOM
JLAV hits and you are done. How should it do that? Why is that right?
It isn't.
CCP needs to make it where friendly vehicles cannot have friendly REs on them.
Problem fixed. LAV go boom ,had half its hp removed and has Res that you as a tanker can detonate.And your teams small arms fire can detonate the Res .I don't see a problem. You lose 3mil ISK in tanks in one match to the same person driving a jihad jeep around, then come on here and tell us how you feel about it. As a former Red Star. PC player, I like the tears. Spkr I know you have lots of tricks and ISK up your sleeves, quit crying.
Probably before I came on board. Did I take your place?
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
|
|
| |
|