|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mobius Wyvern
Sky-FIRE
5861
|
Posted - 2015.03.27 03:31:00 -
[1] - Quote
Moochie Cricket wrote:Did Jenza wear the same pants? Jenza is in Japan, and you can stop being an ******* any time, you know.
I support Keshava for Gallente Specialist HAV
R.I.P. Kesha
|
Mobius Wyvern
Sky-FIRE
5861
|
Posted - 2015.03.27 03:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:I fail to see how CCP is on the "cutting edge", particularly with dust.
Also, ive never played planetside 2, but its clearly a much more ambitious project, and they also didnt have to fire most of their dev team and halt client side development in order to become profitable.
Just sayin' That's exactly what they did, Fiend.
"Operation Make Game Faster" involved an almost year-long COMPLETE halt in feature development just to get the game optimized enough that it would stop constantly crashing and dropping frames on PCs and allow them to release it on the PS4.
Also, SOE has now been sold off based on the "success" of their last few titles, and their future as Daybreak Games is uncertain.Vell0cet wrote:The depth of customization and the skill progression hasn't ever been done before in an FPS. Having loss in the equation also is a significant departure that adds a lot to the game. The lack of any sense of loss or gain was what killed Planetside 2 for me. It just felt like playing on one of those 20,000 ticket Conquest servers in Battlfield 3 where you're left wondering why you came in in the first place after 30 minutes of doing the same thing over and over.
I support Keshava for Gallente Specialist HAV
R.I.P. Kesha
|
Mobius Wyvern
Sky-FIRE
5865
|
Posted - 2015.03.28 03:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
We can only hope that they realize this new policy of clamming up completely isn't going to help anything.
I support Keshava for Gallente Specialist HAV
R.I.P. Kesha
|
Mobius Wyvern
Sky-FIRE
5866
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 12:10:00 -
[4] - Quote
Cross Atu wrote:Paran Tadec wrote:Mad Syringe wrote:Ares 514 wrote:Very useful post. I do however really hope the CPM is pushing for a PS4 port not a PC port. That's exactly the point, I think there are many in the playerbase, who won't move over to PC, but have a PS4 or plan to buy one in the future. I personally won't put any more money in the game, before this decision is made, and backed. the PS4 is a low end PC, they could easily port from PC to PS4. IF they could bring it to a new platform I might actually start playing it again. On that general theme my stance has always been to support a port to both. This stance was stated plainly in my platform before the election and remains true now. Being utterly blunt, as I have said elsewhere, community infighting about "which one" will happen is both detrimental and a waste of energy. In the end market analytics are more likely to decide which "one" if there is only one but a unified community with robust numbers/support for the game is more likely to get both than a divided community. 0.02 ISK Cross The issue is that supporting both platforms will alienate a portion of users from both who don't want to be involved with the "rival faction", so to speak.
If the game supports both, PC players will refuse to play it because it's full of "console peasants", and console players will refused to play it because they don't want to deal with "elitist" PC gamers and hackers.
I support Keshava for Gallente Specialist HAV
R.I.P. Kesha
|
Mobius Wyvern
Sky-FIRE
5868
|
Posted - 2015.03.30 14:50:00 -
[5] - Quote
Cross Atu wrote:
Playing on both console and PC myself for many years I am well aware of the ludicrous feud that is maintained by some, even unto this day. However as I've discovered recently just because a group of people, or even two groups of people, on the internet do a thing does not actually mean that said thing makes any rational constructive sense.
Having this community, of currently active players in Dust 514 seek to forcibly exclude a portion of our own based on their next gen hardware preference (be that desktop or console) is of no constructive merit. It impedes the current game and does nothing to define the format of the ported game except perhaps reduce the likelihood of a duel port.
Even if a portion of each 'faction' refuses to play due to their 'rivals' being present (a very odd stance for those signing into a war game) that does not equate to a lower total potential player base than a port to a single platform. Further those who would take the route of refusing to play under a duel port system are not a very high priority segment of player base, indeed cannot be if their loyalty is more to the hardware than the game. Each hardware type provides many games, seeking to appease someone who may just as likely leave for "greener pastures" as stick around to be active is not the most savvy way to see Dust thrive. Where as supporting both opens the doors to those who have only one or the other hardware type (and not the funds to purchase a second) but still wish to play the game.
The whole discussion may be moot, there may not be a duel port in the cards (much as I support one) and if that's the case then it will be a business decision, based more on market analytics than anything said on these forums, which defines where that port lands.
In essence any way you slice it conducting the "console vs pc war" here on the Dust forums serves no viable constructive purpose, only a detrimental one (AFAIK)
0.02 ISK Cross
I think the whole conflict is stupid as well, but it has effects on the perception of people outside of the conflict, as detrimental as that is.
As well, the issue of game mechanics needs to be considered. A PC player won't tolerate a shooter that places limits on how fast they can aim with their mouse, and at the same time they wouldn't want to play with console players that have Aim-Assist which they commonly refer to as "auto-aim".
While the PC vs Console "war" is beyond stupid, there are some valid gameplay-related issues in the mix.
I support Keshava for Gallente Specialist HAV
R.I.P. Kesha
|
|
|
|