|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sir Dukey
G0DS AM0NG MEN
General Tso's Alliance
1884
   |
Posted - 2015.03.09 19:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Okay fair enough point.
STD 97500
ADV 200,000
Proto 787,000
UHAV 1,227,000
DHAV 787,000
I wouldn't pay that much for a tank for a long time. Especially considering the fact that tanks are weak sauce. It's like proto suits getting lit up by militia shotguns but isk price X20.
Edit: back in the day I'l happy pay up to 2.5 mil for my sagaris during chromosome but AV is so ridiculous that I wont now. Turrets are ridiculous now too.
Acquire Currency, Disregard Female Canis lupus familiaris
|
Sir Dukey
G0DS AM0NG MEN
General Tso's Alliance
1884
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 20:29:00 -
[2] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Sir Dukey wrote:True Adamance wrote:Okay fair enough point.
STD 97500
ADV 200,000
Proto 787,000
UHAV 1,227,000
DHAV 787,000 I wouldn't pay that much for a tank for a long time. Especially considering the fact that tanks are weak sauce. It's like proto suits getting lit up by militia shotguns but isk price X20. Edit: back in the day I'l happy pay up to 2.5 mil for my sagaris during chromosome but AV is so ridiculous that I wont now. Turrets are ridiculous now too. I can somewhat agree but the above look like very fair prices in the current climate. In previous climates 1.5 million ISK+ was absolutely worth the investment.
97500 STD
195000 ADV
390000 PRO
585000 UHAV/DHAV
Acquire Currency, Disregard Female Canis lupus familiaris
|
Sir Dukey
G0DS AM0NG MEN
General Tso's Alliance
1886
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 20:50:00 -
[3] - Quote
[quote=Xocoyol Zaraoul]HAVs can't be expensive yet expendable, are we ditching the "expendable" concept that CCP "introduced" with Wolfman's massive vehicle changes a while back, and designing the new HAVs to be tough nuts to crack?[/quote
I'm im gonna pay a lot of an asset, it better not be blown up by a 28k isk swarm launcher or a 50k isk tank.
Acquire Currency, Disregard Female Canis lupus familiaris
|
Sir Dukey
G0DS AM0NG MEN
General Tso's Alliance
1893
|
Posted - 2015.03.10 02:55:00 -
[4] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote:HAVs can't be expensive yet expendable, are we ditching the "expendable" concept that CCP "introduced" with Wolfman's massive vehicle changes a while back, and designing the new HAVs to be tough nuts to crack? That's a difficult topic to tackle because it requires an almost perfect balance between vehicles having durability so they can function properly on field and at the same time having them vulnerable enough that they can be relatively easily destroyed. The issues then becomes what does expendable mean in terms of vehicles. Currently most ADS and Tanks already are between 3-6 times more expensive than the suit that is likely to destroy them and frankly who wants to run a unit that costs a **** tonne, consumes the same amount of SP as an infantry role, especially when infantry can currently almost do everything better and have access to the most if not all of the map. Personally I'd rather see anti infantry roles from vehicles put into lighter Medium Hulls like MAV [IFV] and Fighters......but god knows we are unlike to get those any time soon.
10-20X more expensive than the lihad vehicles that kill them too.
Acquire Currency, Disregard Female Canis lupus familiaris
|
|
|
| |
|