Can't toss them like a Frisbee in BF3 and battlefield games before it.

BF4 is ****. Do not even use it as evidence.

Would definitely be a better idea to place the RE in the AV/Grenade slot. The throwing distance is definitely a problem but I am personally more concern on the damage the RE impacts on both sides of the field or maybe just decrease the explosion splash range so it wouldn't be almost impossible for heavy to get away.

The guy above me has the right idea. Grenades need to be buffed a lot. Explosive are deadly, and people should accept that.

If there is an issue with grenade spam then increase the amount of nanites they require to replace. In no way should the RE's be nerfed.

Buff grenades so people don't have to use RE's like grenades.

Fixed

Throwing distance is difficult to reduce if we don't want to mess up scouts throwing remotes on tanks. If it were that easy, we would have put zero throw distance a long time ago. I am still collecting data to evaluate if packed remotes can be the AV variant, if it works, then we can reduce the throw distance on the normal one. But, sometimes you need to kill a few sentinels, and remotes are one way.

This is not battlefield, this is eve. Go play battlefield if you want a modern shooter.
Were trying to play eve:dust 514, a tactical shooter/mmorpg for the ps3 and boots-on-the-ground companion to eve online.
The cod/bf group drove out most of the mmo group and that's great bc we never needed to hear "why is this not wow" any more than we ever needed to hear "why is this not cod"

This game is not (cookie cutter shooter #whatever) and weaponry mechanics for(cookie cutter shooter #whatever) don't apply here. This is >8,000years in the future from (cookie cutter shooter #whatever) and you sound like a clod.

Throwing distance is difficult to reduce if we don't want to mess up scouts throwing remotes on tanks. If it were that easy, we would have put zero throw distance a long time ago. I am still collecting data to evaluate if packed remotes can be the AV variant, if it works, then we can reduce the throw distance on the normal one. But, sometimes you need to kill a few sentinels, and remotes are one way.

Throwing distance is difficult to reduce if we don't want to mess up scouts throwing remotes on tanks. If it were that easy, we would have put zero throw distance a long time ago. I am still collecting data to evaluate if packed remotes can be the AV variant, if it works, then we can reduce the throw distance on the normal one. But, sometimes you need to kill a few sentinels, and remotes are one way.

Heavies already have virtually the entire game to themselves. Don't do a single thing to RE's they don't need changing. In fact, make them even more of a nuisance to heavy spammers. Make them STICK to heavies. YES!!!!

Throwing distance is difficult to reduce if we don't want to mess up scouts throwing remotes on tanks. If it were that easy, we would have put zero throw distance a long time ago. I am still collecting data to evaluate if packed remotes can be the AV variant, if it works, then we can reduce the throw distance on the normal one. But, sometimes you need to kill a few sentinels, and remotes are one way.

Why is the remote an anti-tank weapon with the intended use to be thrown. they work just as well in a pile where an intelligent tactical player waits for the tank to drive over them. Oh, wait, that's the job of a proximity mine-BUT- the proximity mines aren't useable with the bandwidth being so high. Good players use all the equipment available in one match. bandwidth handicapped those of us who are more complex players and forced us to play one role making dust more BORING without fixing any of the LAG. How about at least reducing the bandwidth (because you never get rid of a bad idea) to 1mps on proxy mines, reducing the carry count on remotes to ONE, and using bandwidth compression to keep these high ping players from getting the remotes to explode before they even make noise or appear to the rest of us (7mbps down 1.8mbps up users). The point is we are all really pissed that a 3k suit and a rookie user can destroy a squad of generals with a lv1 remote so easily that it has become a tier one strategy. Just like nova knife SIDEARMS being equipped as PRIMARY weapons and dropping SENTINEL SUITS with ONE swipe.

dear CCP,
why do you continue to **** off the players who buy the most aurum?

Why is the remote an anti-tank weapon with the intended use to be thrown. they work just as well in a pile where an intelligent tactical player waits for the tank to drive over them. Oh, wait, that's the job of a proximity mine-BUT- the proximity mines aren't useable with the bandwidth being so high. Good players use all the equipment available in one match. bandwidth handicapped those of us who are more complex players and forced us to play one role making dust more BORING without fixing any of the LAG. How about at least reducing the bandwidth (because you never get rid of a bad idea) to 1mps on proxy mines, reducing the carry count on remotes to ONE, and using bandwidth compression to keep these high ping players from getting the remotes to explode before they even make noise or appear to the rest of us (7mbps down 1.8mbps up users). The point is we are all really pissed that a 3k suit and a rookie user can destroy a squad of generals with a lv1 remote so easily that it has become a tier one strategy. Just like nova knife SIDEARMS being equipped as PRIMARY weapons and dropping SENTINEL SUITS with ONE swipe.

dear CCP,
why do you continue to **** off the players who buy the most aurum?

2 words. Jihad Heavy

Throwing distance is difficult to reduce if we don't want to mess up scouts throwing remotes on tanks. If it were that easy, we would have put zero throw distance a long time ago. I am still collecting data to evaluate if packed remotes can be the AV variant, if it works, then we can reduce the throw distance on the normal one. But, sometimes you need to kill a few sentinels, and remotes are one way.

They are working as intended, now stop being stupid.

This is not battlefield, this is eve. Go play battlefield if you want a modern shooter.
Were trying to play eve:dust 514, a tactical shooter/mmorpg for the ps3 and boots-on-the-ground companion to eve online.
The cod/bf group drove out most of the mmo group and that's great bc we never needed to hear "why is this not wow" any more than we ever needed to hear "why is this not cod"

This game is not (cookie cutter shooter #whatever) and weaponry mechanics for(cookie cutter shooter #whatever) don't apply here. This is >8,000years in the future from (cookie cutter shooter #whatever) and you sound like a clod.

Why is the remote an anti-tank weapon with the intended use to be thrown. they work just as well in a pile where an intelligent tactical player waits for the tank to drive over them. Oh, wait, that's the job of a proximity mine-BUT- the proximity mines aren't useable with the bandwidth being so high. Good players use all the equipment available in one match. bandwidth handicapped those of us who are more complex players and forced us to play one role making dust more BORING without fixing any of the LAG. How about at least reducing the bandwidth (because you never get rid of a bad idea) to 1mps on proxy mines, reducing the carry count on remotes to ONE, and using bandwidth compression to keep these high ping players from getting the remotes to explode before they even make noise or appear to the rest of us (7mbps down 1.8mbps up users). The point is we are all really pissed that a 3k suit and a rookie user can destroy a squad of generals with a lv1 remote so easily that it has become a tier one strategy. Just like nova knife SIDEARMS being equipped as PRIMARY weapons and dropping SENTINEL SUITS with ONE swipe.

dear CCP,
why do you continue to **** off the players who buy the most aurum?