|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
pagl1u M
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
1640
   |
Posted - 2015.02.24 09:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
This is the second thread of this kind, check this that speaks about UP weapons.
Let me try to explain what I'm trying to do whith these kind of threads.
We, as a community, never agrees on anything, ever. If we had a glass full of water we'd stil have a lot of players claiming it is not full...or that that isn't water or something like that.
And this may lead to CCP being confused about our feedbacks:"Who is right? Who should I listen to?"
But say for a second that everyone here agrees on a topic . Say we all think that the weapon X is UP and need a buff. CCP'd be like:"Wow, if they all agree then it means that weapon X is really UP and need a buff. Let's see what we can do".
So here we'll try to help CCP improving this game we love.
Let's start, I'll add only tactics that the whole community thinks are a problem for the game, are ruining the game and should be removed or limited:
Roof Camping: one of the main problem of the game, It might be a tactic but when everyone starts camping roofs then the game is ruined.
LAV+Sentinel: Do I have to explain?
Spamming REs from roofs: This is even worse than the roof camping I talked about before.
I was thinking about adding frisbee REs to the list but I'm not sure everyone will agree it is a cheap tactic. Should I add it?
Suggest me anything else you can think of. If you disagree with the things I added to the list show me why I'm wrong and I'll remove it from the list.
One of the few assaults you'll find in a PC match!
|
Pagl1u M
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
1644
|
Posted - 2015.02.24 12:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
Thank you for explaining to me how to play Dust, I really needed it. Now can we go back to the topic of the thread? (if it wasnt clear enough the topic is: tactics that ruins the game and should be changed.)
To everyone saying that 300wp ob is the fix for roof camping I say that that ob is either bugged or too weak, a lot of times I'm not even able to destroy a single scanned uplink with it. Buffing it could be a good fix for roofcamping.
hold that wrote:roof camping like tower camping is not OP, it's a joke, people who do it lose 90% of the time.
I know it, but that "tactic" still ruin the game for everyone: roofcampers, enemy of roofcampers, friends of roofcampers....everyone!
Monkey MAC wrote:1) Ant's nesting
The act of placing as many uplinks and hives as possible inside a defendable posistion, Ant's nesting is specifically when the enemy can spawn back faster than you can advance
I think that's why we have scouts, their role is to destroy equipments from behind enemy lines
2) Drive Bys
The act of driving upto to a target in a LAV and getting out to blap them at short range, made worse when the perpetraror returns to the LAV whenever they reach low health
yes, I called it Sentinel+LAV but that's what I meant.
3) Capture point camping
The act of sitting on or near a capture point of waiting until either the enemy rounds the corner or begins hacking to kill them
I dont know, you might call it camping but I call it defending, I find it to be a proper tactic
4) Rooftop Ant's nesting
A variant of Ant's nesting on rooftops.
I commented in the quote, these are just my thoughts...
Derpty Derp wrote:
Yes you should... What suit should be used on an exposed small turret?
Going to edit the OP right now, Sentinels using turrets is not what I meant. Monkey explained what I meant: The act of driving upto to a target in a LAV and getting out to blap them at short range, made worse when the perpetraror returns to the LAV whenever they reach low health
One of the few assaults you'll find in a PC match!
|
Pagl1u M
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
1651
|
Posted - 2015.02.24 18:04:00 -
[3] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:How can there be cheap tactics in a strongbox game?
ftfy, really "sandbox" ahahaha!!!!
Atiim wrote:1. If they're tossing REs from the roof, move away from the roof.
I repeat it again I'm not really looking for tips & tricks here, I know how to play this game. But That IS a cheap tactic, one of those that ruins the game.
2. I find it amusing how you contemplate tossing REs on the list but don't include stacking 1300 HP Sentinels on an objective.
I hate OP sentinels as much as you do and I find it crazyli stupid how OP they have been since 1.8. BUT you know as well as me that not everyone can see how they are wrong. If I were to add the to the list we'd have tons of sentinel users jumping in to claim sentinels are fine (lol) and that they are only good at their intended role (lol). That's why I can't add them to the list. W have to agree as a community on the things that I put on the list.
One of the few assaults you'll find in a PC match!
|
Pagl1u M
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
1660
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 13:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
MrShooter01 wrote:Edau Skir2 wrote:
Later in the game? It's 300WP! Solo its asy, in a squad is laughably easy.
Rooftop camping isn't the problem, people ignoring the small flux OB is
They aren't very reliable though Even when you learn how to aim them, often the blasts will hit the roof and fail to destroy the uplinks, especially if there's any kind of complex geometry on the roof like a null cannon or tiny ridges I wish the flux strikes actually worked like flux grenades and penetrated everything with a huge radius, even enough to clear out uplinks under the roof in the production facility or the underground supply depot in the science facility
this. the 300 wp ob is teorically a good counter to roof uplinks but it doesnt work well enough.
One of the few assaults you'll find in a PC match!
|
Pagl1u M
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
1660
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 13:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
DRT 99 wrote:
on a side note: i know heavies in LAVs are scrubby, but what about blaster LAVs?
what do you mean? Do you consider LAVs with a blaster turret a cheap tactic? Explain.
One of the few assaults you'll find in a PC match!
|
|
|
| |
|