|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nothing Certain
Bioshock Rejects
1534
   |
Posted - 2015.02.23 21:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
I think all this would achieve is the stompers would stomp harder and the quitters would quit sooner.
I think we need to quit accomodating stompers and start looking at the reason why people don't try. AFKing was never a problem, the fact that people found it funner and more rewarding to AFK rather than actually play was. People not coming out of the redline is not a problem, the fact that they would rather hide there is. Punishing the actions caused by stomping by rewarding stomping more is ass backwards.
Because, that's why.
|
Nothing Certain
Bioshock Rejects
1543
|
Posted - 2015.02.24 21:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Nothing Certain wrote:I think all this would achieve is the stompers would stomp harder and the quitters would quit sooner.
I think we need to quit accomodating stompers and start looking at the reason why people don't try. AFKing was never a problem, the fact that people found it funner and more rewarding to AFK rather than actually play was. People not coming out of the redline is not a problem, the fact that they would rather hide there is. Punishing the actions caused by stomping by rewarding stomping more is ass backwards. I have so much ISK it doesn't matter. But the others die once in proto and are now in a hole.. It's not their fault and it's not ours. You can say this only benefits proto stompers but guess what most proto stompers don't have to worry about isk.. I run my Quafe suits 80% of the time.. Let's hear your idea.
I think they are working on my idea, separating players so that high SP vets and squads don't play against relatively low SP players. My fear is that many protosquads will just switch to militia gear and continue their stomping ways in these lower metalevels because they like stomping rather than tough fights.
Because, that's why.
|
Nothing Certain
Bioshock Rejects
1543
|
Posted - 2015.02.24 21:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
Slave of MORTE wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:We don't yet have enough pubstomps. Let's incentivize them! This is the very mindset that keeps the top players on top. People like you think more ISK leads to more stomps. I say more ISK leads to better gear the stompers face in a given battle. If minimum pay is the same with or without work, what is the likely action? It's already been inarguably proven that increased payouts promote rougher matches There was that time when payouts were bugged and what happened ..The fights got rougher newer players felt comfortable running higher end gear people actually fought back Satisfying payouts promote better fights
FW does pretty much what is being suggested, guving high payouts to the winners and low payouts to the losers. Wearing your best suit and squadding up is promoted. How is that working out? In my view, rally bad.
Because, that's why.
|
|
|
| |
|