|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
7563
|
Posted - 2015.02.01 21:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
1) I do think that in some instances they are easy to see, while in others they are not. I think that given the cloak nerfs, the fact that they can no longer be used for easy combat, that perhaps they could make the cloak less visible in movement (I think that they are fine where they are if used when stationary).
2) I don't think 3% will do much. I think that instead of a per level bonus to cloak that the entire bonus be unlocked at std level (possibly ADV if somehow this is a major issue). That way it will still provide some benefit for new players that want to use it.
3 and 4 I think are addressed above.
I don't think the point of cloaks should be to run THROUGH large groups so much as run AROUND them.
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
7586
|
Posted - 2015.02.02 22:17:00 -
[2] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Lightning35 Delta514 wrote:Poll- answer below.
1 who agrees that cloaked scouts are somewhat easy to see moving in MOST maps(background,lighting,stuff)
2 who agrees that cloaks shoud have pg/cpu SLIGHTLY REDUSED (3%?)(to fit on std scouts for newbies)
3 who agrees that cloaked scouts should have their tone/color redused? (Make them a bit more invisible.)
4 who agrees that they should be fixed?
5 (for scouts) who agrees that they will have a better chance of running through crowds without being Insta popped by someone who saw a blue blur running with what is stated?
1. Unless they had a wallhack or managed to scan every area on the map constantly with no margin of error, it would be impossible to say yes it would be a Toupee fallacy. People need to stop misusing the Toupee fallacy.
That ONLY comes into play when someone says they ALWAYS see something...
The OP clearly did not use the term ALWAYS, therefore the use of it is moot.
The misinterpretation of this and its constant over use is becoming cliche and a major pet peeve for me.
If someone uses a cloak, and notices a significant number of times where others are able to spot them moving, that is a valid observation.
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
7591
|
Posted - 2015.02.03 03:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Talos Vagheitan wrote:I think cloaks could be tweaked, but overall work pretty well.
I think they are appropriately easy to see. If someone is sprinting out in the open, then there should be a chance of spotting. A player should still have to use some stealth.
I think though that there should be a greater difference in how much you can see the cloak shroud. As far as I can tell, someone barely moving while cloaked looks the same as someone fully sprinting, but I could be wrong.
You are not wrong. Crouch walking gets the same shimmer as sprinting.
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
|
|
|