|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
All Gucci
T.H.I.R.D R.O.C.K
General Tso's Alliance
165
   |
Posted - 2015.02.01 15:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
Stefan Stahl wrote:Jebus McKing wrote:The point though still remains that the ScR performs much better The official stance on this appears to be "It's OP, but not many people use it, thus it's not a problem". Rattati has agreed before that the ScR's efficiency in terms of kills/rifle is better than with other weapons ( source). But since it's still used comparatively seldom nerfing it would just remove it from the game. If you consider the ScR overly powerful the only solution right now is to advertise it's power by using it more. P.S.: I don't personally agree with that method. I'm just trying to let you know why this topic won't change anything.
Rattati has agreed before that the ScR's efficiency in terms of kills/rifle is better than with other weapons<--- where did he say this? he said its the most efficient, he never said that in relation to kills? you cry babies just constantly make up **** it's so funny lmao
it is not dominant in Kills compared to other rifles. this is what he said in relation to ScR kills
Do you choose to only see parts of the sentence you want to ? you making up bullshit isn't going to help your argument... the ScR wont get touched until the amarr assault has its appropriate stats.
Director / Slayer / Emperor
|
All Gucci
T.H.I.R.D R.O.C.K
General Tso's Alliance
166
|
Posted - 2015.02.01 18:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
Efficiency could be in relation to it's ability to be used at most ranges effectively.... until he specifies what exactly it is efficient at, you cant just assume he is speaking abut kills  ...it is not dominant in Kills compared to other rifles here I will highlight and underline the part he does talk about kills. you may continue your crying if you want ,but don't say Rattati backs up your claims cause I don't see it 
Director / Slayer / Emperor
|
All Gucci
T.H.I.R.D R.O.C.K
General Tso's Alliance
173
|
Posted - 2015.02.02 06:08:00 -
[3] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:All Gucci wrote:Stefan Stahl wrote:Jebus McKing wrote:The point though still remains that the ScR performs much better The official stance on this appears to be "It's OP, but not many people use it, thus it's not a problem". Rattati has agreed before that the ScR's efficiency in terms of kills/rifle is better than with other weapons ( source). But since it's still used comparatively seldom nerfing it would just remove it from the game. If you consider the ScR overly powerful the only solution right now is to advertise it's power by using it more. P.S.: I don't personally agree with that method. I'm just trying to let you know why this topic won't change anything. Rattati has agreed before that the ScR's efficiency in terms of kills/rifle is better than with other weapons<--- where did he say this? he said its the most efficient, he never said that in relation to kills? you cry babies just constantly make up **** it's so funny lmao it is not dominant in Kills compared to other rifles. this is what he said in relation to ScR kills Do you choose to only see parts of the sentence you want to ? you making up bullshit isn't going to help your argument... the ScR wont get touched until the amarr assault has its appropriate stats. Odd statement coming from a guy that wants the Amarr Assault speed or HP increased based on his own selective data.
I didn't feel like doing all the math to prove that we had the worst health/speed ratio.. but earlier I posted the comparisons using gal/cal base hp....and the pattern still persists (amarr-gal/cal-min)  .... I was going to do min base hp but i thought people would get the clue after doing it with gal/cal hp  .....
Director / Slayer / Emperor
|
All Gucci
T.H.I.R.D R.O.C.K
General Tso's Alliance
173
|
Posted - 2015.02.02 06:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
Shamarskii Simon wrote:I just have to say this.
-20% of a large number, isn't that big of a difference.
I'll just pull a random number out... 65.
65 * 0.8 = 52.
Still a pretty high number.
Plus the ROF? 52 adds up quickly.
I understand there's o.h + semi-auto, but other weapons have kick or kick + spool time. Semi auto also has variable ROF (user dependant)
O.H + Low kick + low mag + high damage >= Kick + larger mag/ spool + kick
'>' because in that amount of time, the number of rounds hitting can be the same... higher damage wins.
But why not just burst fire like kick? Make Kick = Heat and you understand what i'm saying.
Now, it's just a thought... I have no side to pick in this.
spend 20% of your life in jail and see if 1/5 isn't a big difference
Director / Slayer / Emperor
|
|
|
| |
|