|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
LUGMOS
Quafe Premium
1476
   |
Posted - 2015.01.12 17:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Thread is adorable. A coalescent of all of the worst arguments vehicle users use to justify being overpowered. <3
Alright, this got out of hand fast (surprised it was encited by a CPM O.o)
So let me just say this:
People need to look at their conduct before posting ANYTHING, especially in a stance where people look up to you.
Kinda disappointing that nobody read the rest and just blew hot air out of their ass...
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Quafe Premium
1476
|
Posted - 2015.01.12 17:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
HIGHLY IMPORTANT!!!
OP clearly says there needs to be a purpose for vehicles, right now it is to kill other vehicles, which is boring because all vehicle fights end in 30 seconds,where ISK just goes poof.
Then its back to "farming" infantry, which is where the QQ comes from.
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Quafe Premium
1476
|
Posted - 2015.01.12 17:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:LUGMOS wrote:Kinda disappointing that nobody read the rest and just blew hot air out of their ass... I actually did read the rest. It just got funnier from there though. He wants a DS with a pre-fitted cloak, he wants vehicles to spawn on the ground, and he wants vehicles' defenses buffed, and probably a couple other things designed to ensure he cannot ever die.
Also kinda disappointing where nobody can mute out the bad and at least acknowledge there is some semblance of a good idea somewhere...
But its just easier to shoot everything down isn't it.
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Quafe Premium
1478
|
Posted - 2015.01.12 18:04:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:There is only one problem imho, the amount of armor shredding AV weapons.
If we had more shield shredding av weapons more people would use it and you could use armor tanked vehicles to counter it but for now they are mostly pointless or extremely hard to use.
I would simply add more resistance to armor hardeners till racial parity is ingame.
What? Buff vehicles? But theyre already OP...
Apparently. According to the blanket assumption that all vehicles are, not just SHIELDS vs SWARMS(armor based)
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Quafe Premium
1478
|
Posted - 2015.01.12 18:13:00 -
[5] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:I can only laugh at that forum "wisdom", my shield tanked vehicles can tank swarms all day 
*sigh
Get your big boy pants on and quit being a sarcastic child. It doesn't make anyone look good.
You have to admit, shield tanks are very good against swarms (at least while hardened) as it should be. But because of this, swarmers want their av buffed to deal with this, in which case armor based vehicles get **** on even harder.
Armor vehicles are not the problem, its mostly shielded vehicles.
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Quafe Premium
1482
|
Posted - 2015.01.12 23:21:00 -
[6] - Quote
Shamarskii Simon wrote:I'm posting this first before i actually reply.
In all bad, there is good. In all good, there is bad.
Basically i am saying, regardless of how foolish an idea is or sound, a few things in the idea is not a bad thing.
Please, professional at most; respectful at least. The conflict between AV vs Vehicles is becoming stupid and losing its true purpose: balance.
Can we scrap our egos' for the better of the Dust community? I'm tired of watching people acting like they are absolute, perfect, and most intelligent. Thank you.
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
|
|
| |
|