|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Juno Tristan
Obscure Reference
249
   |
Posted - 2015.01.13 09:13:00 -
[1] - Quote
xavier zor wrote:
Thanks for the tip, i will try it out :)
i am assuming that the vehicle is battling with the infantry, and no other infantry is around. Of course if other infantry were around, especially minjas.....
whole different story
but then it's 2 v 1, so of course you lose |
Juno Tristan
Obscure Reference
249
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 21:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote:
And when one of the HAV crowd has the audacity to say without irony that a solo AV gunner should be unable to take an HAV one on one,
I don't think most pilots would say they want to be invulnerable 1 v 1, just that in a head on confrontation the tank should win
In the same way that a head on confrontation against a heavy should go to the heavy, it requires an ambush to take out solo |
Juno Tristan
Obscure Reference
250
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 21:30:00 -
[3] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Breakin Stuff I k noticed erlyer when you were detailing the changes to the forge gun you missed one thing that I myself think should be returned . When I used to forge gun in chrome when you lined a tanks sweet spot up at the back you got 204% efficiency again shields and 214% efficiency against armour and that has been several decreased to 104% and 114% I think I'm not in game to check at the moment but that old 204% used to serve my breech forge guns well and I do think it should be returned both as a tanker and a forge gunner. The current multiplier is 167%. That's more than enough.
I would not be surprised if Rattati was unaware of vehicle weakspots |
Juno Tristan
Obscure Reference
251
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 11:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:
this is what only CoD scrubs want (or people with similar mindset)
if it requires more than a single person to fack up a tank (or use tank by yourself) you create artificial number imbalance. the team that can afford to waste more tanks on the field would simply have bigger advantage.
this is not rocket science. this is simple math, -1 guy devoted to taking objectives in a tank wrecking the field, -2 guys on the other taking care of him, oh look suddenly enemy team with tank has +1 advantage unless you pick up tank yourself. result AV = useless, go tank or go home. imbalance again and binary game mechanics, none of that belong to games in this century.
we already had that, we do not want that. if you want it, go play world of tanks and enjoy your arcade style tank gameplay.
but if tanks are AV and you can't hack a point in a tank then they can't bring the numerical advantage to bear |
Juno Tristan
Obscure Reference
251
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 12:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Juno Tristan wrote:but if tanks are AV and you can't hack a point in a tank then they can't bring the numerical advantage to bear if a tank is only for AV what is the point of a tank if it cannot be used as force multiplier? just to cruise around, destroy some installations and do nothing the rest of the game?
Deny enemy mobility through destroying LAVs and Dropships
Add small turrets for AI, and the infantry AV battle becomes 2 v 2 |
Juno Tristan
Obscure Reference
251
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 13:08:00 -
[6] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:Juno Tristan wrote:Jack McReady wrote:Juno Tristan wrote:but if tanks are AV and you can't hack a point in a tank then they can't bring the numerical advantage to bear if a tank is only for AV what is the point of a tank if it cannot be used as force multiplier? just to cruise around, destroy some installations and do nothing the rest of the game? Deny enemy mobility through destroying LAVs and Dropships Add small turrets for AI, and the infantry AV battle becomes 2 v 2 does not really work out with limited turret elevation, even worse, the dropship will hover over you and destroy your tank with small rails and with your approach AV wont be able to deal with the dropship because AV will be pointless. and LAV is simply to fast to keep up with turret turn speed.
That's the ADS working as intended
Use blasters against LAVs |
Juno Tristan
Obscure Reference
252
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 18:10:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:you havent used vehicles, did you ? 
Lol, you're right, I'm just a tyre kicker |
|
|
| |
|