DUST Search - Network Latency (ping) IPs for battle servers.

All Channels

Technical Support/Bugs

Network Latency (ping) IPs for battle servers.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
[Veteran_CCP Mindstar] 0	Posted - 2012.05.21 13:27:00 - [1] - Quote Hi guys, our servers IP address are changed now. We'll update this post in case of further updates.
[Veteran_Big] 0	Posted - 2012.05.21 13:41:00 - [2] - Quote CCP MINDSTAR!!! <3 I'm from Singapore, looks like I'm getting somewhat playable latencies(224 ms avg US, 304 ms avg EU). Still far from what I'm used to though :) luckily I'm not having too many problems with killing people
[Veteran_jackb ubu] 0	Posted - 2012.05.21 15:24:00 - [3] - Quote Ping went out from Germany to EU server, 22ms average and 140ms to US servers both very good pings, however sadly doesnt prevent the performance issues or the hitbox detection problems :(
[Veteran_Markus Morataya] 0	Posted - 2012.05.21 16:40:00 - [4] - Quote I am getting about 50ms to the EU server from the UK, seems to be in Amsterdam.
[Veteran_Orion-ji Tor] 0	Posted - 2012.05.21 19:24:00 - [5] - Quote lol I live in the US EST and TTL to US servers is 118 while TTL to EU servers is 111
[Veteran_Jambo] 0	Posted - 2012.05.21 22:28:00 - [6] - Quote US: ~240ms EU: ~305ms From Brisbane. I still kill some fools. ;-) Reminds me of my PSTN modem days.
[Veteran_xp3ll3d dust514] 0	Posted - 2012.05.22 05:48:00 - [7] - Quote Jambo wrote: US: ~240ms EU: ~305ms From Brisbane. Yeah I'm getting similar pings here in Australia US: 220ms EU: 330ms
[Veteran_Ima Leet] 0	Posted - 2012.05.22 06:41:00 - [8] - Quote i'm US EST as well and i'm getting about, US: 50-60ms EU: 130+ms
[Veteran_Black Dolphin] 0	Posted - 2012.05.22 07:36:00 - [9] - Quote my ping stats to the two ip addresses from my linux PC: --- 159.253.143.196 ping statistics --- 14 packets transmitted, 14 received, 0% packet loss, time 13019ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 7.960/8.775/9.705/0.625 ms --- 173.193.23.235 ping statistics --- 17 packets transmitted, 16 received, 5% packet loss, time 16021ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 132.909/134.132/139.356/1.499 ms i live in Amsterdam :P cheers BD
[Veteran_Grideris] 0	Posted - 2012.05.22 08:15:00 - [10] - Quote CCP Mindstar best Mindstar. Also, he has the best hats for pub crawls. If you ever go to Fanfest, go crawling with him (And CCP Nothin). Anyway, my pings: Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196 (EU): Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 332ms, Maximum = 333ms, Average = 332ms Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235 (US): Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 203ms, Maximum = 207ms, Average = 204ms From Brisbane, Australia. Seems to be consistent with the other Aussies from the east coast.

[Veteran_CCP Mindstar] 0	Posted - 2012.05.22 10:22:00 - [11] - Quote Orion-ji Tor wrote: lol I live in the US EST and TTL to US servers is 118 while TTL to EU servers is 111 Can you do a tracert to the US ip from you? 118 sounds pretty high from within the US.
[Veteran_Player 0003] 0	Posted - 2012.05.22 10:23:00 - [12] - Quote Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235: (us) Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 96ms, Maximum = 97ms, Average = 96ms Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196: (eu) Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 216ms, Maximum = 222ms, Average = 219ms This is from hawaii.
[Veteran_MIRKINZ] 0	Posted - 2012.05.22 16:54:00 - [13] - Quote Is there a way to ping from your playstation?
[Veteran_Ima Leet] 0	Posted - 2012.05.22 19:36:00 - [14] - Quote MIRKINZ wrote: Is there a way to ping from your playstation? if you can find a website that will perform the ping for you? otherwise not that i'm aware of, i'm also not aware of such a site. do you not have a computer?
[Veteran_TOKP] 0	Posted - 2012.05.22 19:58:00 - [15] - Quote Haciendo ping a 159.253.143.196 con 32 bytes de datos: Respuesta desde 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 tiempo=47ms TTL=112 Respuesta desde 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 tiempo=46ms TTL=112 Respuesta desde 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 tiempo=49ms TTL=112 Respuesta desde 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 tiempo=52ms TTL=112 Spain
[Veteran_Vrain] 0	Posted - 2012.05.22 22:22:00 - [16] - Quote From Toronto, Canada 173.193.23.235(US) ~ 51 ms, 0% loss 159.253.143.196(EU) ~ 108 ms, 0% loss
[Veteran_Etero] 0	Posted - 2012.05.23 05:22:00 - [17] - Quote From Toa Baja, Puerto Rico (EU) 159 ms, 0% packet loss. (US) 88 ms, 0% packet loss. Jeez, that's a substantial difference between servers.
[Veteran_XBARTX99] 0	Posted - 2012.05.24 00:07:00 - [18] - Quote seattle washington usa 55ms eu 162ms
[Veteran_Obitus Atres] 0	Posted - 2012.05.24 16:30:00 - [19] - Quote usa 156ms eu 65ms from Madrid (spain)
[Veteran_Goat] 0	Posted - 2012.05.25 08:08:00 - [20] - Quote Bucharest, Romania 100 Mbs/s FTTB connection EU: 44ms (round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 44.441/44.565/44.664/0.079 ms) US: 181ms (round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 180.125/181.238/182.174/0.542 ms)

[Veteran_Cy Sphere] 0	Posted - 2012.05.25 14:39:00 - [21] - Quote South Korea 200 Mbp/s FTTB [US] - 173.193.23.235 = 150ms, 15 hops HoopTimeServer 11 ms59.X.X.X 29691 msHost unknown. TimedOut 32 ms61.78.44.96 41 ms112.189.121.121- KOREA, REPUBLIC OF, SEOUL 52 ms125.130.13.253- KOREA, REPUBLIC OF, SEOUL 610 ms220.73.149.121- KOREA, REPUBLIC OF, SEOUL 73 ms112.174.82.106- KOREA, REPUBLIC OF, SEOUL 82 ms112.174.84.202- KOREA, REPUBLIC OF, SEOUL 9216 ms112.174.87.122- KOREA, REPUBLIC OF, SEOUL 10183 ms206.81.80.140- UNITED STATES, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 11225 ms173.192.18.145- UNITED STATES, TEXAS, DALLAS 12238 ms173.192.18.138- UNITED STATES, TEXAS, DALLAS 13264 ms173.192.18.213- UNITED STATES, TEXAS, DALLAS 14160 ms66.228.118.223- UNITED STATES, TEXAS, DALLAS 15210 ms173.193.23.235- UNITED STATES, FLORIDA, MIAMI Trace complete. [EU] - 159.253.143.196 ~ 350ms - 2ms Jitter, 21 hops Hop TimeServer 11 ms59.X.X.X 29630 msHost unknown. TimedOut 33 ms61.78.44.96 41 ms112.189.121.77- KOREA, REPUBLIC OF, SEOUL 53 ms125.130.2.177- KOREA, REPUBLIC OF, SEOUL 615 ms218.145.32.113- KOREA, REPUBLIC OF, SEOUL 77 ms112.174.81.106- KOREA, REPUBLIC OF, SEOUL 83 ms112.174.83.142- KOREA, REPUBLIC OF, SEOUL 9185 ms112.174.87.122- KOREA, REPUBLIC OF, SEOUL 10189 ms206.81.80.140- UNITED STATES, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 11217 ms173.192.18.145- UNITED STATES, TEXAS, DALLAS 12216 ms173.192.18.169- UNITED STATES, TEXAS, DALLAS 13241 ms173.192.18.130- UNITED STATES, TEXAS, DALLAS 14228 ms173.192.18.170- UNITED STATES, TEXAS, DALLAS 15252 ms173.192.18.133- UNITED STATES, TEXAS, DALLAS 16363 ms50.97.18.205- UNITED STATES, TEXAS, DALLAS 17312 ms50.97.18.207- UNITED STATES, TEXAS, DALLAS 18316 ms50.97.18.211- UNITED STATES, TEXAS, DALLAS 19321 ms50.97.18.251- UNITED STATES, TEXAS, DALLAS 20263 ms159.253.158.133 - UNITED STATES, TEXAS, DALLAS 21326 ms159.253.143.196 - UNITED STATES, OHIO, AMSTERDAM Trace complete. Well that's interesting, the EU server is in Ohio (unless the lookup is wrong)? Makes sense, I think a huge pipe just went up there. I've seen other MMO 'EU' servers based out of NY.
[Veteran_MIRKINZ] 0	Posted - 2012.05.25 14:50:00 - [22] - Quote Ima Leet wrote: MIRKINZ wrote: Is there a way to ping from your playstation? if you can find a website that will perform the ping for you? otherwise not that i'm aware of, i'm also not aware of such a site. do you not have a computer? I have a PC, just wanted to make sure there wasnt some LAN issue with my playstation causing hi lags. I can play other games fine on it and stream movies etc. Just would be nice to see what the ping was to my device.
[Veteran_True Venture] 0	Posted - 2012.05.26 08:07:00 - [23] - Quote Ping from Hamburg (Germany) to EU Server: 41ms to US Server: 163ms mfg
[Veteran_Keugeben] 0	Posted - 2012.05.26 11:07:00 - [24] - Quote Quote: Pinging 173.193.23.235 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=113 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=113 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=113 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=113 Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 29ms, Maximum = 31ms, Average = 29ms C:\Users\Keith>ping 159.253.143.196 Pinging 159.253.143.196 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=153ms TTL=105 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=166ms TTL=105 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=151ms TTL=105 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=154ms TTL=105 Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 151ms, Maximum = 166ms, Average = 156ms From greater Houston area, on AT&T U-verse I'm guessing that the US server is in Dallas?
[Veteran_Nahtlog] 0	Posted - 2012.05.26 13:59:00 - [25] - Quote From Medford, Oregon Pinging 173.193.23.235 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=117 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=117 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=117 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=117 Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 80ms, Maximum = 86ms, Average = 82ms Pinging 159.253.143.196 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=233ms TTL=109 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=240ms TTL=109 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=279ms TTL=109 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=199ms TTL=109 Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 199ms, Maximum = 279ms, Average = 237ms Not bad at all.
[Veteran_kawashi gyu] 0	Posted - 2012.05.26 14:41:00 - [26] - Quote from helsinki finland: Pinging 159.253.143.196 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=116 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=116 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=116 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=116 But despite the decent ping, the gameplay would suggest that the traffic doesn't flow smoothly.
[Veteran_Anonymous Mercenary] 0	Posted - 2012.05.26 17:00:00 - [27] - Quote Northern Territory Australia. US; 274 EU: 396 :(
[Veteran_Ennea Hedron] 0	Posted - 2012.05.26 17:30:00 - [28] - Quote I'm in Michigan, US. US: 55 ms EU: 115 ms
[Veteran_nylon octopus] 0	Posted - 2012.05.27 16:02:00 - [29] - Quote From New Zealand EU: 302ms US: 184ms Pretty standard, very playable.
[Veteran_Sakari Wakuu] 0	Posted - 2012.05.27 17:23:00 - [30] - Quote From Belgium, Antwerp here EU: 12ms US: 123ms Seems like a solid connection from Belgium, thanks guys!

[Veteran_Klokvarg Adhocrat] 0	Posted - 2012.05.27 17:46:00 - [31] - Quote I experience quite a bit of lag in game, even on US servers. (from Seattle area) US: 58ms EU: 171ms for reference eve server: 179ms dust forums: 182ms (yet minutes to load pages)
[Veteran_Libertine Mark I] 0	Posted - 2012.05.27 17:48:00 - [32] - Quote From Seattle; USA MIn / Max (in ms) EU: ~166 US: ~52 no packet loss
[Veteran_Kraig Ghist] 0	Posted - 2012.05.27 19:43:00 - [33] - Quote Though, this is good to be able to ping the server from the pc, but the beta is on the ps3, people have different network set-up for their consoles including myself
[Veteran_Grig Marnis] 0	Posted - 2012.05.28 03:33:00 - [34] - Quote From Sydney AU here and the pings are something of an issue for us here. Are there Oceanic servers planned? I'm not saying it's unplayable but going to be hard to compete against others with sub 100 pings. EU: 299 US: 213
[Veteran_Khulam] 0	Posted - 2012.05.28 03:34:00 - [35] - Quote 40ms for the US server from Orlando FL. I have a feeling it has something to do with PSN itself....
[Veteran_tehmajordust] 0	Posted - 2012.05.28 05:57:00 - [36] - Quote US: 218 EU: 340 Im from New Zealand and both seem pretty unplayable due to lag and frame rate issues
[Veteran_Bazza McDonald] 0	Posted - 2012.05.28 11:44:00 - [37] - Quote Hey Gang, Im from South Australia and my ping data is: Pinging 159.253.143.196 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=1601ms TTL=103 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=389ms TTL=103 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=398ms TTL=103 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=407ms TTL=103 Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 389ms, Maximum = 1601ms, Average = 698ms AND: Pinging 173.193.23.235 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=633ms TTL=111 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=321ms TTL=111 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=320ms TTL=111 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=328ms TTL=111 Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 320ms, Maximum = 633ms, Average = 400ms Im running Wireless broadband from 30m of cable attached to a directional antenna thats 10m above the ground in an area where we are not supposed to get internet apart from dial up or satellite, so Im not complaining lol
[Veteran_Raven Tesio] 0	Posted - 2012.05.28 11:58:00 - [38] - Quote London, UK 100 Mb/s Fiber Optic EU: 26ms (114 TTL) US: 148ms (114 TTL) (Windows 7) as Reference EVE: 20ms (118 TTL) PS3 NAT Type 2 (Moderate) [My Xbox 360 has the Unrestricted NAT assigned to it] Down: 7.6Mbps Up: 0.9Mbps This bitrates should be a little higher, but as I've set each WiFi (Type-N) connection to a max of 10Mbps as to prevent any one device taking the whole bandwidth ... this is more than enough to play any other online games. To be honest the performance issues don't seem to be based to much on the latency of the game, although without studing the netcode you guys are using difficult to make a truely informed decision about that; still I've noticed in games with smaller populations (<16) the game is playable and with populations very small (<8) it is as smooth as most other FPS games, like Battlefield 3 or Killzone 3.
[Veteran_Orion-ji Tor] 0	Posted - 2012.05.28 20:49:00 - [39] - Quote CCP Mindstar wrote: Orion-ji Tor wrote: lol I live in the US EST and TTL to US servers is 118 while TTL to EU servers is 111 Can you do a tracert to the US ip from you? 118 sounds pretty high from within the US. Sorry, I've been to busy playing , but here are the results Tracing route to 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 7 ms 7 ms 8 ms 10.208.0.1 2 7 ms 7 ms 8 ms gig1-0-0.653.wlmgncilm-rtr1.ec.rr.com [24.25.32. 56] 3 12 ms 13 ms 14 ms 24.93.64.108 4 21 ms 23 ms 23 ms 107.14.19.20 5 19 ms 19 ms 18 ms 107.14.19.133 6 19 ms 19 ms 18 ms 66.109.11.246 7 31 ms 34 ms 35 ms ae0.bbr01.tl01.atl01.networklayer.com [173.192.1 8.153] 8 53 ms 46 ms 46 ms ae13.bbr02.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com [173.192. 18.134] 9 47 ms 46 ms 54 ms ae0.dar02.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com [173.192.1 8.213] 10 46 ms 46 ms 46 ms po2.fcr05.sr06.dal01.networklayer.com [66.228.11 8.223] 11 47 ms 53 ms 47 ms 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235] Trace complete.
[Veteran_CCP Mindstar] 0	Posted - 2012.05.29 00:08:00 - [40] - Quote Orion-ji Tor wrote: 11 47 ms 53 ms 47 ms 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235] Looks like its ~50ms instead of 111, so that is good and more in line with what is expected.

[Veteran_Thorolf Kveldulfson] 0	Posted - 2012.05.29 11:04:00 - [41] - Quote Swindon Wiltshire UK To Eu servers Pinging 159.253.143.196 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=116 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=116 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=116 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=116 Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 22ms, Maximum = 27ms, Average = 24ms Tracing route to 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 19 ms 7 ms 16 ms cpc2-swin16-2-0-gw.3-1.cable.virginmedia.com [82 .22.24.1] 2 9 ms 11 ms 11 ms brhm-core-2b-ae3-3499.network.virginmedia.net [8 1.110.128.181] 3 27 ms 59 ms 10 ms brhm-bb-1b-ae8-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.253 .174.77] 4 14 ms 11 ms 10 ms nrth-bb-1a-as4-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.253 .185.105] 5 16 ms 14 ms 14 ms nrth-bb-1b-ae0-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.253 .185.118] 6 16 ms 30 ms 15 ms tele-ic-4-ae0-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.253. 174.18] 7 18 ms 19 ms 15 ms ldn-b4-link.telia.net [213.248.70.29] 8 30 ms 18 ms 15 ms ldn-bb1-link.telia.net [80.91.247.91] 9 19 ms 19 ms 17 ms ldn-b3-link.telia.net [80.91.247.25] 10 17 ms 18 ms 15 ms xe-1-0-1.bbr01.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com [213. 248.97.226] 11 21 ms 48 ms 20 ms ae7.bbr02.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com [50.97.18. 207] 12 23 ms 22 ms 22 ms ae0.bbr02.eq01.ams02.networklayer.com [50.97.18. 211] 13 42 ms 29 ms 23 ms ae6.dar01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [50.97.18. 249] 14 25 ms 22 ms 25 ms po1.fcr01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [159.253.1 58.131] 15 24 ms 23 ms 23 ms 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196] I get more lag on these forums than I do in game so far
[Veteran_Marbin Nikia] 0	Posted - 2012.05.29 12:49:00 - [42] - Quote Tracing route to 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 4 ms 4 ms 3 ms CISCO12876 [192.168.1.1] 2 13 ms 14 ms 22 ms ip72-204-0-1.fv.ks.cox.net [72.204.0.1] 3 15 ms 13 ms 13 ms wsip-70-182-122-93.ks.ks.cox.net [70.182.122.93] 4 15 ms 12 ms 13 ms wsip-70-182-120-249.ks.ks.cox.net [70.182.120.24 9] 5 26 ms 133 ms 102 ms kscydsrj01-ae0.rd.ks.cox.net [70.183.71.85] 6 23 ms 23 ms 23 ms 70.183.71.61 7 32 ms 36 ms 34 ms chgobprj01-ae2.0.rd.ch.cox.net [68.1.0.216] 8 151 ms 104 ms 99 ms ae20.bbr01.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com [173.192. 18.136] 9 125 ms 109 ms * ae0.dar01.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com [173.192.1 8.253] 10 100 ms 101 ms 102 ms po2.fcr05.sr06.dal01.networklayer.com [66.228.11 8.223] 11 124 ms 101 ms 100 ms 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235] Trace complete.
[Veteran_Dougasa Kahoud] 0	Posted - 2012.05.29 18:29:00 - [43] - Quote Ping from Frankfurt am Main (Germany) to EU Server : 46 ms to US Server : 166 ms
[Veteran_SuperMido] 0	Posted - 2012.05.29 19:57:00 - [44] - Quote I live in New Jersey USA, here are my results: [US IP]: Min: 79mS Max: 80mS Avg: 79mS [EU IP]: Min: 111mS Max: 111mS Avg: 111mS
[Veteran_Ilya Kruchkov] 0	Posted - 2012.05.29 21:16:00 - [45] - Quote US=162ms EU=57ms Russia, Moscow
[Veteran_ultramrin] 0	Posted - 2012.05.30 04:35:00 - [46] - Quote US: 243 EU: 111 Russia, Surgut
[Veteran_Oposum] 0	Posted - 2012.05.30 17:12:00 - [47] - Quote Southern Germany (BaW++, Lkr. Tuttlingen) [EU] = 25ms [US] = 145ms
[Veteran_Alex Jammer] 0	Posted - 2012.05.31 04:43:00 - [48] - Quote Russia, Rostov-Don [EU]=76ms [US]=190ms
[Veteran_Skar De Vil] 0	Posted - 2012.05.31 12:28:00 - [49] - Quote Russia, Yekaterinburg [EU]=93ms [US]=235ms
[Veteran_Tykjen76] 0	Posted - 2012.05.31 12:28:00 - [50] - Quote Pinging from Troms++, Norway. ping 173.193.23.235 Pinging 173.193.23.235 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=111 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=111 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=111 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=111 Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 178ms, Maximum = 179ms, Average = 178ms ping 159.253.143.196 Pinging 159.253.143.196 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=111 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=111 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=111 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=111 Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 60ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 60ms

[Veteran_Anshur Fulkrieg] 0	Posted - 2012.06.01 19:02:00 - [51] - Quote From my Pc to the EU server. Host: IP: 159.253.143.196 Sent: 24 Received: 22 Lost: 2 Loss Rate: 8.33 % Min Time: 42 ms Max Time: 51 ms Avg Time: 43 ms Avg TTL: 111 From my PC to the US server. Host: IP: 173.193.23.235 Sent: 24 Received: 12 Lost: 12 Loss Rate: 50.00 % Min Time: 156 ms Max Time: 164 ms Avg Time: 159 ms Avg TTL: 109
[Veteran_Nebuzar Draconis] 0	Posted - 2012.06.02 05:25:00 - [52] - Quote My ping from the PC is great (134ms - US) but it's not the same for the PS3 which is lagging horribly during matches, and even in the MQ, I think it's partly cause of the map size itself and all the stuff it's trying to sync. Dont get me wrong i love a large map but i think they're going to have to be toned down a bit for this to actually be up to quality.
[Veteran_Unmei Umida] 0	Posted - 2012.06.02 08:08:00 - [53] - Quote Ping with tracert. Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7600] Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. C:\Users\Chris>tracert 173.193.23.235 Tracing route to 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms 1 ms <1 ms adsl-67-117-30-134.dsl.chic01.pacbell.net [67.11 7.30.134] 2 11 ms 13 ms 11 ms adsl-67-117-31-254.dsl.chic01.pacbell.net [67.11 7.31.254] 3 11 ms 11 ms 11 ms dist1-vlan50.chi2ca.sbcglobal.net [67.126.80.66] 4 13 ms 11 ms 11 ms 151.164.53.102 5 34 ms 33 ms 33 ms ggr7.sffca.ip.att.net [12.122.114.13] 6 34 ms 35 ms 35 ms 192.205.36.2 7 * * * Request timed out. 8 35 ms 35 ms 35 ms ae11.bbr01.eq01.sjc02.networklayer.com [65.113.3 2.242] 9 36 ms 35 ms 35 ms ae7.bbr02.eq01.sjc02.networklayer.com [173.192.1 8.165] 10 44 ms 43 ms 43 ms ae0.bbr02.cs01.lax01.networklayer.com [173.192.1 8.151] 11 44 ms 43 ms 43 ms ae7.bbr01.cs01.lax01.networklayer.com [173.192.1 8.166] 12 74 ms 72 ms 72 ms ae19.bbr01.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com [173.192. 18.140] 13 73 ms 73 ms 76 ms ae0.dar01.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com [173.192.1 8.211] 14 74 ms 72 ms 72 ms po1.fcr05.sr06.dal01.networklayer.com [66.228.11 8.221] 15 73 ms 72 ms 72 ms 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235] Trace complete. C:\Users\Chris>ping 173.193.23.235 Pinging 173.193.23.235 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=113 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=113 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=113 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=113 Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 72ms, Maximum = 74ms, Average = 73ms C:\Users\Chris>tracert 159.253.143.196 Tracing route to 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms 1 ms <1 ms adsl-67-117-30-134.dsl.chic01.pacbell.net [67.11 7.30.134] 2 13 ms 9 ms 9 ms adsl-67-117-31-254.dsl.chic01.pacbell.net [67.11 7.31.254] 3 13 ms 11 ms 11 ms 63.200.183.194 4 13 ms 11 ms 11 ms 151.164.53.104 5 35 ms 33 ms 36 ms 12.122.200.9 6 35 ms 35 ms 35 ms 192.205.33.46 7 108 ms 115 ms 108 ms nyk-bb1-link.telia.net [80.91.252.152] 8 205 ms 179 ms 181 ms ldn-bb1-link.telia.net [80.91.248.202] 9 179 ms 179 ms 180 ms ldn-b3-link.telia.net [80.91.249.170] 10 182 ms 182 ms 181 ms xe-1-0-1.bbr01.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com [213. 248.97.226] 11 168 ms 167 ms 169 ms ae7.bbr02.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com [50.97.18. 207] 12 173 ms 173 ms 173 ms ae0.bbr02.eq01.ams02.networklayer.com [50.97.18. 211] 13 178 ms 175 ms 177 ms ae6.dar02.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [50.97.18. 251] 14 173 ms 173 ms 173 ms po2.fcr01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [159.253.1 58.133] 15 176 ms 173 ms 173 ms 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196] Trace complete. C:\Users\Chris>ping 159.253.143.196 Pinging 159.253.143.196 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=183ms TTL=105 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=105 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=105 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=105 Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 171ms, Maximum = 183ms, Average = 178ms
[Veteran_Sarge Colgreen] 0	Posted - 2012.06.02 17:19:00 - [54] - Quote Ping and Tracert from Brazil Microsoft Windows [vers+úo 6.1.7600] Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. Todos os direitos reservados. C:\Users\Alexandre>tracert 173.193.23.235 Rastreando a rota para 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235] com no m+íximo 30 saltos: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms Broadcom.Home [192.168.1.1] 2 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms Broadcom.Home [192.168.1.1] 3 8 ms 7 ms 8 ms 177.133.128.1.dynamic.adsl.gvt.net.br [177.133.1 28.1] 4 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 186.215.223.225.static.host.gvt.net.br [186.215. 223.225] 5 11 ms 11 ms 11 ms gvt-te-7-1-rc01.rjo.gvt.net.br [189.59.244.169] 6 47 ms 47 ms 47 ms gvt-po-1-0-0-rc01.sdr.gvt.net.br [189.59.244.78] 7 46 ms 47 ms 46 ms 187.115.216.174.static.host.gvt.net.br [187.115. 216.174] 8 160 ms 160 ms 161 ms Xe0-1-0-0-grtssatw1.red.telefonica-wholesale.net [84.16.7.157] 9 150 ms 151 ms 158 ms Xe5-2-0-0-grtfortw1.red.telefonica-wholesale.net [84.16.14.242] 10 157 ms 157 ms 157 ms Xe5-1-2-0-grtmiana2.red.telefonica-wholesale.net [94.142.127.50] 11 126 ms 125 ms 126 ms softlayer-AE-0-0-grtmiana2.red.telefonica-wholes ale.net [213.140.51.190] 12 130 ms 126 ms 126 ms ae7.bbr01.tm01.mia01.networklayer.com [173.192.1 8.174] 13 151 ms 151 ms 151 ms ae3.bbr01.sr02.hou02.networklayer.com [173.192.1 8.162] 14 178 ms 155 ms 156 ms ae3.bbr01.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com [173.192.1 8.218] 15 155 ms 155 ms 156 ms ae0.dar01.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com [173.192.1 8.211] 16 159 ms 156 ms 156 ms po1.fcr05.sr06.dal01.networklayer.com [66.228.11 8.221] 17 155 ms 156 ms 157 ms 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235] Rastreamento conclu+¡do. C:\Users\Alexandre>ping 173.193.23.235 Disparando 173.193.23.235 com 32 bytes de dados: Resposta de 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 tempo=156ms TTL=115 Resposta de 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 tempo=156ms TTL=115 Resposta de 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 tempo=156ms TTL=115 Resposta de 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 tempo=169ms TTL=115 Estat+¡sticas do Ping para 173.193.23.235: Pacotes: Enviados = 4, Recebidos = 4, Perdidos = 0 (0% de perda), Aproximar um n+¦mero redondo de vezes em milissegundos: M+¡nimo = 156ms, M+íximo = 169ms, M+¬dia = 159ms C:\Users\Alexandre>tracert 159.253.143.196 Rastreando a rota para 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196] com no m+íximo 30 saltos: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms Broadcom.Home [192.168.1.1] 2 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms Broadcom.Home [192.168.1.1] 3 11 ms 7 ms 7 ms 177.133.128.1.dynamic.adsl.gvt.net.br [177.133.1 28.1] 4 8 ms 7 ms 9 ms 186.215.223.226.static.host.gvt.net.br [186.215. 223.226] 5 16 ms 11 ms 11 ms gvt-te-7-1-rc02.rjo.gvt.net.br [189.59.244.177] 6 11 ms 11 ms 11 ms 187.115.216.166.static.host.gvt.net.br [187.115. 216.166] 7 8 ms 8 ms 7 ms Te8-3.asr1.GIG1.gblx.net [64.214.147.61] 8 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms ae0-scr1.GIG1.gblx.net [67.16.136.1] 9 132 ms 132 ms 132 ms xe5-1-0-10G.scr3.NYC1.gblx.net [67.16.167.58] 10 132 ms 143 ms 136 ms lag1.ar9.NYC1.gblx.net [67.16.142.50] 11 132 ms 132 ms 133 ms aol-1.ar2.DCA3.gblx.net [64.208.27.74] 12 133 ms 148 ms 156 ms nyk-bb2-link.telia.net [213.155.130.242] 13 192 ms 207 ms 191 ms ldn-bb2-link.telia.net [213.155.135.66] 14 192 ms 195 ms 191 ms ldn-b3-link.telia.net [80.91.249.176] 15 247 ms 190 ms 191 ms xe-1-0-1.bbr01.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com [213. 248.97.226] 16 192 ms 207 ms 192 ms ae7.bbr02.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com [50.97.18. 207] 17 198 ms 198 ms 198 ms ae0.bbr02.eq01.ams02.networklayer.com [50.97.18. 211] 18 200 ms 199 ms 199 ms ae6.dar01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [50.97.18. 249] 19 206 ms 212 ms 207 ms po1.fcr01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [159.253.1 58.131] 20 203 ms 210 ms 204 ms 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196] Rastreamento conclu+¡do. C:\Users\Alexandre>ping 159.253.143.196 Disparando 159.253.143.196 com 32 bytes de dados: Resposta de 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 tempo=203ms TTL=115 Resposta de 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 tempo=202ms TTL=115 Resposta de 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 tempo=202ms TTL=115 Resposta de 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 tempo=204ms TTL=115 Estat+¡sticas do Ping para 159.253.143.196: Pacotes: Enviados = 4, Recebidos = 4, Perdidos = 0 (0% de perda), Aproximar um n+¦mero redondo de vezes em milissegundos: M+¡nimo = 202ms, M+íximo = 204ms, M+¬dia = 202ms C:\Users\Alexandre>
[Veteran_BAM HUSQVARNA] 0	Posted - 2012.06.03 02:55:00 - [55] - Quote From Newcastle, Australia: US: 274 EU: 392 Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235: Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Minimum = 274ms, Maximum = 295ms, Average = 287ms Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196: Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Minimum = 392ms, Maximum = 401ms, Average = 397ms
[Veteran_Kris HighShot] 0	Posted - 2012.06.03 13:56:00 - [56] - Quote Hi --- 3 juin 2012 16:00:19 PING 159.253.143.196 (159.253.143.196) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 159.253.143.196: icmp_seq=1 ttl=112 time=56.5 ms 64 bytes from 159.253.143.196: icmp_seq=2 ttl=112 time=54.0 ms 64 bytes from 159.253.143.196: icmp_seq=3 ttl=112 time=53.5 ms --- 159.253.143.196 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2012ms min = 53.552 ms avg = 54.731 ms max = 56.565 ms mdev = 1.341 ms Is that good ? By the way, any ports tcp, udp to open ? Bye
[Veteran_Hellaciouss Deeds] 0	Posted - 2012.06.04 04:57:00 - [57] - Quote US = 55ms ave EU = 118ms ave Michigan
[Veteran_Trinciatore92] 0	Posted - 2012.06.06 14:31:00 - [58] - Quote near ROME (IT) EU ~ 46 ms US ~ 147 ms package send 4 recive 4 lost 0%
[Veteran_lDocHollidayl] 0	Posted - 2012.06.07 18:15:00 - [59] - Quote Michigan...avg. 86ms to US...not planning on playing EU.
[Veteran_Jubal Azizora] 0	Posted - 2012.06.08 01:39:00 - [60] - Quote Jambo wrote: US: ~240ms EU: ~305ms From Brisbane. I still kill some fools. ;-) Reminds me of my PSTN modem days. The most fun I've ever had playing an FPS was Counter-Strike on an HPB server. I stayed on it (with simulated latency) even after I got cable. :) edit: ping wrote: --- 159.253.143.196 ping statistics --- 100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 99094ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.789/27.852/43.365/4.266 ms ping wrote: --- 173.193.23.235 ping statistics --- 100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 99139ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 136.169/140.890/190.593/6.015 ms I'm in southern England.

[Veteran_Goran Juntado] 0	Posted - 2012.06.08 10:39:00 - [61] - Quote From Eastern Canada I'm averaging about 49ms to the US server and for the EU server my average jumps all the way up to 109ms. So I guess it all makes sense
[Veteran_NeoSu GoldMan] 0	Posted - 2012.06.08 19:47:00 - [62] - Quote From Portugal : 159.253.143.196 (EU) - 50-53ms Works fine .. GG everyone :P !!
[Veteran_Brahma El Indio] 0	Posted - 2012.06.09 00:05:00 - [63] - Quote BAM HUSQVARNA wrote: From Newcastle, Australia: US: 274 EU: 392 Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235: Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Minimum = 274ms, Maximum = 295ms, Average = 287ms Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196: Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Minimum = 392ms, Maximum = 401ms, Average = 397ms Sydney - >500 Ms to US, >700ms to EU Hope they have regional servers at launch....
[Veteran_Kaylon Syil] 0	Posted - 2012.06.09 00:49:00 - [64] - Quote US Server for me, in Alabama, is 48ms. Lag was still horrible last night though.
[Veteran_VLoneStarV] 0	Posted - 2012.06.09 04:16:00 - [65] - Quote ok im starting to think this network issues is a ps3 issue because i sat at my console testing the net connection on it for 15 minutes constantly and i kept bounceing betwen 5.5 and 9.5 alot it was never the same numbers twice Im also pinging at 66.5 with me net from NB Canada
[Veteran_Andrew Baldacchino] 0	Posted - 2012.06.09 16:03:00 - [66] - Quote I live in Sydney Australia. My ping results are:- US: 280ms EU: 399ms When i play i experience terrible lag, the map overview takes time to load, etc. I really enjoy the game but the lag is crippling.
[Veteran_stewey2 azule] 0	Posted - 2012.06.10 03:28:00 - [67] - Quote Ping from sacramento California 8:26 pm 6-9-2012 to 173.193.23.235 .... 4 packets sent 0%loss min 88ms max 90ms to 159.253.143.196 4 packets sent 0%loss min 200ms max 201ms
[Veteran_Mars El'Theran] 0	Posted - 2012.06.10 07:21:00 - [68] - Quote Tracing route to 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.1 over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 7 ms 8 ms 19 ms ######## 2 40 ms 11 ms 11 ms rd1wh-ge1-1-2.vc.sh 3 114 ms 99 ms 139 ms rc2wh-tge0-4-2-0.vc 4 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms rc2bb-tge0-7-1-0.vc 5 232 ms 243 ms 275 ms rc3sj-tge0-0-1-0.cl 6 37 ms 36 ms 35 ms te1-7.bbr01.eq01.sj 7 35 ms 36 ms 70 ms ae7.bbr02.eq01.sjc0 8 74 ms 42 ms 42 ms ae0.bbr02.cs01.lax0 9 43 ms 44 ms 43 ms ae7.bbr01.cs01.lax0 10 85 ms 83 ms 83 ms ae19.bbr01.eq01.dal 11 237 ms 82 ms 80 ms ae0.dar01.sr01.dal0 12 81 ms 83 ms 83 ms po1.fcr05.sr06.dal0 13 446 ms 276 ms 95 ms 235.23.193.173.hype Trace complete. PS C:\Users\#######> ping 173.193.23.235 Pinging 173.193.23.235 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=1 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=1 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=1 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=1 Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% l Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 80ms, Maximum = 82ms, Average = 81ms Lag has been bad tonight, so I figured I'd check this out. Ping doesn't seem too bad, but my tracert seems full of hiccups. Location: BC, Canada. EU: PS C:\Users\######> ping 159.253.143.196 Pinging 159.253.143.196 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=184ms TTL=116 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=184ms TTL=116 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=184ms TTL=116 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=192ms TTL=116 Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 184ms, Maximum = 192ms, Average = 186ms PS C:\Users\#####> tracert 159.253.143.196 Tracing route to 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 10 ms 7 ms 8 ms ######## 2 35 ms 15 ms 15 ms rd1wh-ge1-1-2.vc.s 3 37 ms 15 ms 15 ms rc2wh-tge0-4-0-0.v 4 56 ms 59 ms 59 ms 66.163.78.142 5 45 ms 47 ms 48 ms rc3sj-tge0-7-0-0.cl. 6 45 ms 43 ms 44 ms te1-7.bbr01.eq01.sjc01 7 72 ms 80 ms 71 ms ae0.bbr02.cs01.den01 8 106 ms 105 ms 94 ms ae0.bbr02.eq01.chi01 9 202 ms 83 ms 83 ms ae7.bbr01.eq01.chi01 10 105 ms 103 ms 556 ms ae0.bbr02.tl01.nyc01 11 176 ms 175 ms 175 ms ae0.bbr01.tg01.lon01 12 175 ms 175 ms 180 ms ae7.bbr02.tg01.lon01 13 194 ms 183 ms 184 ms ae0.bbr02.eq01.ams02 14 191 ms 191 ms 192 ms ae6.dar01.sr01.ams01 15 218 ms 190 ms 194 ms po1.fcr01.sr01.ams01 16 190 ms 186 ms 182 ms 196.143.253.159.hyp
[Veteran_Jimbeezy] 0	Posted - 2012.06.10 09:28:00 - [69] - Quote Pinging 173.193.23.235 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=196ms TTL=118 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=162ms TTL=118 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=118 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=118 Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 47ms, Maximum = 196ms, Average = 121ms Los Angeles, CA
[Veteran_woess] 0	Posted - 2012.06.10 09:36:00 - [70] - Quote dust is really lagy for me and i only play on eu server eu: 74ms us: 170 ms the beta is really laggy i have to shoot infront of an walking enemy to hit the hitbox... if i shoot at the model i do not get any hitmarkers... so hitbox is not on the model because of the lag i have...

[Veteran_Nom Lemming] 0	Posted - 2012.06.11 15:30:00 - [71] - Quote Warrington, UK. Fibre-optic Broadband connection 39 - 80 ms, 52ms average Euro Server 146 - 170 ms, 152 ms average US Server
[Veteran_Nom Lemming] 0	Posted - 2012.06.11 15:32:00 - [72] - Quote woess wrote: dust is really lagy for me and i only play on eu server eu: 74ms us: 170 ms the beta is really laggy i have to shoot infront of an walking enemy to hit the hitbox... if i shoot at the model i do not get any hitmarkers... so hitbox is not on the model because of the lag i have... It may not be all lag... IRL you have to "lead" a target to hit it if it's moving. Could be they've added that in to Dust 514 to make it more "interesting". After all... bullets don't bend round corners (except for Coriolis effect and bullet spin/drop effects).
[Veteran_gobbybobby o] 0	Posted - 2012.06.13 08:31:00 - [73] - Quote EU 40 ping average US 160 Ping average From Gloucestershire UK. (ADSL 2 meg broadband)
[Veteran_GraphiiiX 117] 0	Posted - 2012.06.13 18:21:00 - [74] - Quote Eastern Canadian Gamer: US: minimum 66ms - maximum 86ms - average 72ms EU: minimum 87ms - maximum 89ms - average 87ms Cheers.
[Veteran_Findor Yolunda] 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 11:21:00 - [75] - Quote Pinging from Muscat, Oman, Middle East US min - 282 max - 286 avg - 283 EU min - 166 max - 168 avg - 166
[Veteran_Pakcik Cafe] 0	Posted - 2012.06.14 14:06:00 - [76] - Quote from malaysia US = 269ms EU=385ms
[Veteran_Vulpes Velox] 0	Posted - 2012.06.16 00:31:00 - [77] - Quote Greensboro, North Carolina, USA Pinging 173.193.23.235 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=119 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=119 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=119 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=119 Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 35ms, Maximum = 35ms, Average = 35ms Pinging 159.253.143.196 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=111 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=111 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=111 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=111 Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 104ms, Maximum = 108ms, Average = 106ms
[Veteran_Jack Boost] 0	Posted - 2012.06.16 09:42:00 - [78] - Quote Back to this topic... EU -> 40ms US -> 160ms.... and render game almost unplayable because server dont count hits to target. (heavies/bunnies/normal grunts)
[Veteran_Second Chiral] 0	Posted - 2012.06.17 07:33:00 - [79] - Quote Perth, Australia EU -> 443 ms US -> 268 ms Please Please Please put a server in Singapore
[Veteran_Omega FFV] 0	Posted - 2012.06.19 00:01:00 - [80] - Quote Brussels, Belgium: US: ~133ms EU: ~86ms

[Veteran_Barthanix] 0	Posted - 2012.06.19 14:30:00 - [81] - Quote From Lahti (Finland) US 159ms EU 45ms
[Veteran_Ginger 555] 0	Posted - 2012.06.22 03:17:00 - [82] - Quote I am in Shanghai China Pings Around 400ms to both servers I die .... lots !! Still love it !! Was hoping for a CN server as the game is being developed down the road from my Flat
[Veteran_Demasiado Lockhart] 0	Posted - 2012.06.22 08:47:00 - [83] - Quote From Italy: (EU) ==> 61 ms (US) ==> 171 ms For the italan network quality , it's a good result.
[Veteran_woess] 0	Posted - 2012.06.22 09:59:00 - [84] - Quote please ccp fix the lag and don't allow players higher than 70-80ms be on the same server with players less than 70-80ms... because this is really anoing if a lagger joins a server and he is lagging.... you can't hit them because of the lag... i mean my ping to the eu servers 159.253.143.196 is now around 43ms and if i play agains a lagger i can't hit him because of the lag.... so please make something about it maybe in the matchmaking the server should collect players with ping till 70ms and let them play together ... but please do not allow players with high ping joiny the servers... this is really gamebreaking
[Veteran_Torvus Niminen] 0	Posted - 2012.06.22 20:21:00 - [85] - Quote 44ms to EU and about 140ms US from Germany
[Veteran_Akimbo MyGherkin] 0	Posted - 2012.06.24 10:54:00 - [86] - Quote I am from Hong Kong and round trip times are US 248 EU 357
[Veteran_Gollas Gentralde] 0	Posted - 2012.06.26 04:23:00 - [87] - Quote Tracing route to 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235] over a maximum of 30 hops: Idaho (US) to US Server 1 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms (My IP LOL) 2 40 ms 39 ms 38 ms boid-dsl-gw06-198.boid.qwest.net [184.99.64.198] 3 40 ms 40 ms 39 ms 184-99-65-41.boid.qwest.net [184.99.65.41] 4 56 ms 54 ms 54 ms sea-edge-12.inet.qwest.net [67.14.41.26] 5 68 ms 54 ms 54 ms ae11.bbr02.wb01.sea02.networklayer.com [63.228.127.66] 6 86 ms 55 ms 55 ms ae7.bbr01.wb01.sea02.networklayer.com [173.192.18.186] 7 77 ms 70 ms 85 ms ae0.bbr01.cs01.den01.networklayer.com [173.192.18.145] 8 88 ms 88 ms 88 ms ae12.bbr02.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com [173.192.18.138] 9 125 ms 122 ms 121 ms ae1.dar02.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com [173.192.18.213] 10 88 ms 89 ms 88 ms po2.fcr05.sr06.dal01.networklayer.com [66.228.118.223] 11 89 ms 89 ms 89 ms 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235] Trace complete. Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 88ms, Maximum = 89ms, Average = 88ms Tracing route to 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196] over a maximum of 30 hops: Idaho (US) to EU Server 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms (Baleeted x2) 2 39 ms 39 ms 39 ms boid-dsl-gw06-198.boid.qwest.net [184.99.64.198] 3 40 ms 40 ms 39 ms boid-agw1.inet.qwest.net [184.99.65.41] 4 76 ms 54 ms 54 ms sea-brdr-02.inet.qwest.net [67.14.41.18] 5 54 ms 56 ms 54 ms sea-b1-link.telia.net [80.239.194.29] 6 73 ms 71 ms 71 ms den-b1-link.telia.net [213.155.134.208] 7 97 ms 98 ms 96 ms chi-bb1-link.telia.net [213.155.130.136] 8 117 ms 117 ms 118 ms nyk-bb1-link.telia.net [80.91.246.167] 9 193 ms 193 ms 193 ms ldn-bb1-link.telia.net [213.155.135.68] 10 193 ms 193 ms 224 ms ldn-b3-link.telia.net [80.91.247.25] 11 199 ms 200 ms 196 ms xe-1-0-1.bbr01.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com [213.248.97.226] 12 189 ms 190 ms 191 ms ae7.bbr02.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com [50.97.18.207] 13 214 ms 215 ms 216 ms ae0.bbr02.eq01.ams02.networklayer.com [50.97.18.211] 14 201 ms 201 ms 201 ms ae6.dar01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [50.97.18.249] 15 200 ms * 201 ms po1.fcr01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [159.253.158.131] 16 202 ms 201 ms 201 ms 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196] Trace complete. Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 201ms, Maximum = 202ms, Average = 201ms
InFamouS Frandalou Zumari Force Projection Caldari State 1	Posted - 2012.06.26 20:25:00 - [88] - Quote --- 26 juin 2012 22:30:56 From Paris-France Area PING 159.253.143.196 (159.253.143.196) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 159.253.143.196: icmp_seq=1 ttl=112 time=56.0 ms 64 bytes from 159.253.143.196: icmp_seq=2 ttl=112 time=56.4 ms 64 bytes from 159.253.143.196: icmp_seq=3 ttl=112 time=46.8 ms --- 159.253.143.196 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2013ms min = 46.838 ms avg = 53.127 ms max = 56.474 ms mdev = 4.454 ms
iLKHAN Falcon Hazard Mat 0	Posted - 2012.06.27 12:08:00 - [89] - Quote To get an idea on a ping pack mid-west from St. Louis- EU- 147.587/155.645/162.402/4.112 ms (avg total) US- 148.041/154.453/159.947/4.354 ms (been avg around 30-40 til prior)
Si Coc In This B tch LLC 2	Posted - 2012.06.27 21:53:00 - [90] - Quote Pinging 173.193.23.235 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=118 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=118 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=118 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=118 Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 6ms, Maximum = 6ms, Average = 6ms - I think I've got you all beat :) I <3 my 25MBit/sec up/down FiOS!

Kirby Grohl Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 1	Posted - 2012.06.29 08:33:00 - [91] - Quote From Auckland, New Zealand (US Server) PING 173.193.23.235 (173.193.23.235): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 173.193.23.235: icmp_seq=0 ttl=113 time=459.937 ms 64 bytes from 173.193.23.235: icmp_seq=1 ttl=113 time=380.294 ms 64 bytes from 173.193.23.235: icmp_seq=2 ttl=113 time=608.221 ms 64 bytes from 173.193.23.235: icmp_seq=3 ttl=113 time=528.258 ms 64 bytes from 173.193.23.235: icmp_seq=4 ttl=113 time=448.621 ms 64 bytes from 173.193.23.235: icmp_seq=5 ttl=113 time=369.293 ms 64 bytes from 173.193.23.235: icmp_seq=6 ttl=113 time=255.947 ms 64 bytes from 173.193.23.235: icmp_seq=7 ttl=113 time=517.371 ms 64 bytes from 173.193.23.235: icmp_seq=8 ttl=113 time=437.707 ms 64 bytes from 173.193.23.235: icmp_seq=9 ttl=113 time=664.963 ms --- 173.193.23.235 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 255.947/467.061/664.963/113.259 ms (EU Server) PING 159.253.143.196 (159.253.143.196): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 159.253.143.196: icmp_seq=0 ttl=110 time=770.611 ms 64 bytes from 159.253.143.196: icmp_seq=1 ttl=110 time=690.879 ms 64 bytes from 159.253.143.196: icmp_seq=2 ttl=110 time=611.408 ms 64 bytes from 159.253.143.196: icmp_seq=3 ttl=110 time=531.806 ms 64 bytes from 159.253.143.196: icmp_seq=4 ttl=110 time=759.941 ms 64 bytes from 159.253.143.196: icmp_seq=5 ttl=110 time=679.935 ms 64 bytes from 159.253.143.196: icmp_seq=6 ttl=110 time=600.749 ms 64 bytes from 159.253.143.196: icmp_seq=7 ttl=110 time=520.663 ms 64 bytes from 159.253.143.196: icmp_seq=8 ttl=110 time=748.306 ms 64 bytes from 159.253.143.196: icmp_seq=9 ttl=110 time=669.189 ms --- 159.253.143.196 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 520.663/658.349/770.611/85.527 ms
Drake Sword 0	Posted - 2012.06.29 18:55:00 - [92] - Quote My location: Preston England EU Server: 12.781 ms US Server:132.622 ms I always get heavy lag on this game like stutter walking cant hack etc
Demian Asleepkiller Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 2	Posted - 2012.06.30 06:55:00 - [93] - Quote from Santiago, Chile US 168ms EU ms Download 40 MB UpLoad 2 MB more than playable....
The FoXi Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 0	Posted - 2012.06.30 11:08:00 - [94] - Quote From:Estonia ISP:ELION EU: ~50 US: ~170
Rake Amatre Algintal Core Gallente Federation 0	Posted - 2012.07.01 15:00:00 - [95] - Quote Form Faroe Islands EU: 64ms US: 158ms
darksoul nemisis LostinWar 1	Posted - 2012.07.01 18:18:00 - [96] - Quote From UK Pinging [173.193.23.235] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=145ms TTL=114 Pinging [173.193.23.235] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=114 Pinging [173.193.23.235] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=149ms TTL=114 Pinging [173.193.23.235] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=145ms TTL=114 Pinging [159.253.143.196] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=113 Pinging [159.253.143.196] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=113 Pinging [159.253.143.196] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=113 Pinging [159.253.143.196] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=113
Michael Erwin 1	Posted - 2012.07.01 19:34:00 - [97] - Quote Ping and Tracert from Tennessee USA C:\Windows\system32>tracert 173.193.23.235 Tracing route to 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms ERWIN-FILES [192.168.1.1] 2 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.225.32.1 3 8 ms 10 ms 11 ms dtr03kgpttn-tge-0-7-0-1.kgpt.tn.charter.com [96.34.68.68] 4 9 ms 9 ms 10 ms crr01kgpttn-tge-0-6-0-3.kgpt.tn.charter.com [96.34.68.66] 5 8 ms 9 ms 9 ms crr02kgpttn-tge-0-0-0-5.kgpt.tn.charter.com [96.34.71.85] 6 14 ms 13 ms 15 ms crr02spbgsc-tge-0-0-0-3.spbg.sc.charter.com [96.34.71.187] 7 15 ms 19 ms 19 ms bbr01spbgsc-tge-0-6-0-4.spbg.sc.charter.com [96.34.1.46] 8 21 ms 23 ms 23 ms bbr02atlnga-tge-0-1-0-7.atln.ga.charter.com [96.34.0.108] 9 20 ms 19 ms 23 ms prr02atlnga-tge-0-1-0-3.atln.ga.charter.com [96.34.3.84] 10 22 ms 19 ms 19 ms 50.97.16.28 11 47 ms 47 ms 45 ms ae13.bbr02.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com [173.192.18.134] 12 46 ms 45 ms 46 ms ae1.dar02.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com [173.192.18.213] 13 46 ms 46 ms 46 ms po2.fcr05.sr06.dal01.networklayer.com [66.228.118.223] 14 46 ms 46 ms 45 ms 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235] Trace complete. C:\Windows\system32>ping 173.193.23.235 Pinging 173.193.23.235 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=110 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=110 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=110 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=110 Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 45ms, Maximum = 51ms, Average = 47ms C:\Windows\system32>tracert 159.253.143.196 Tracing route to 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms ERWIN-FILES [192.168.1.1] 2 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.225.32.1 3 10 ms 9 ms 9 ms dtr03kgpttn-tge-0-7-0-1.kgpt.tn.charter.com [96.34.68.68] 4 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms crr01kgpttn-tge-0-6-0-3.kgpt.tn.charter.com [96.34.68.66] 5 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms crr02kgpttn-tge-0-0-0-7.kgpt.tn.charter.com [96.34.71.83] 6 14 ms 13 ms 13 ms crr02spbgsc-tge-0-0-0-3.spbg.sc.charter.com [96.34.71.187] 7 18 ms 15 ms 15 ms bbr01spbgsc-tge-0-7-0-6.spbg.sc.charter.com [96.34.1.50] 8 28 ms 23 ms 23 ms bbr02atlnga-tge-0-0-0-7.atln.ga.charter.com [96.34.0.40] 9 20 ms 19 ms 19 ms prr02atlnga-tge-0-1-0-0.atln.ga.charter.com [96.34.3.137] 10 20 ms 19 ms 19 ms 50.97.16.28 11 31 ms 29 ms 29 ms ae0.bbr01.eq01.wdc02.networklayer.com [173.192.18.152] 12 47 ms 31 ms 31 ms ae7.bbr02.eq01.wdc02.networklayer.com [173.192.18.195] 13 113 ms 113 ms 112 ms ae0.bbr01.eq01.ams02.networklayer.com [50.97.18.215] 14 113 ms 113 ms 113 ms ae5.dar01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [50.97.18.237] 15 113 ms * 113 ms po1.fcr01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [159.253.158.131] 16 112 ms 113 ms 113 ms 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196] Trace complete. C:\Windows\system32>ping 159.253.143.196 Pinging 159.253.143.196 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=114 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=114 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=114 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=114 Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 112ms, Maximum = 114ms, Average = 113ms
Shinto Tama Bragian Order Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2012.07.02 05:32:00 - [98] - Quote US: Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235: Packets: Sent = 261, Received = 261, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 57ms, Maximum = 173ms, Average = 63ms EU: Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196: Packets: Sent = 367, Received = 367, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 96ms, Maximum = 209ms, Average = 103ms Pennsylvania,
D-Rock Sand Mercenary Corps Inc. 6	Posted - 2012.07.05 17:23:00 - [99] - Quote US Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 156ms, Maximum = 482ms, Average = 238ms EU Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 58ms, Maximum = 66ms, Average = 60ms Edinburgh Scotland
carl von oppenheimer Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 158	Posted - 2012.07.05 17:37:00 - [100] - Quote From Finland: US-servers: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 7 ms 7 ms 6 ms dsl-pribrasgw1-ff00c300-1.dhcp.inet.fi [88.19 .1] 3 13 ms 13 ms 13 ms tkucore01-o-2-3-0-0.datanet.tele.fi [141.208. .45] 4 32 ms 43 ms 97 ms hkiasbr2-o-4.datanet.tele.fi [141.208.25.18] 5 17 ms 17 ms 18 ms hls-b1-link.telia.net [213.248.68.209] 6 24 ms 25 ms 24 ms s-bb2-link.telia.net [80.91.250.60] 7 97 ms 33 ms 37 ms kbn-bb2-link.telia.net [213.248.65.166] 8 125 ms 125 ms 126 ms nyk-bb2-link.telia.net [213.155.134.52] 9 120 ms 121 ms 121 ms nyk-b6-link.telia.net [213.155.133.13] 10 118 ms 115 ms 114 ms xe-0-0-1.bbr02.tl01.nyc01.networklayer.com [2 248.72.174] 11 137 ms 137 ms 137 ms ae1.bbr01.eq01.chi01.networklayer.com [173.19 8.132] 12 161 ms 164 ms 177 ms ae20.bbr01.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com [173.1 18.136] 13 186 ms 171 ms 171 ms ae0.dar02.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com [173.19 8.253] 14 190 ms 166 ms 172 ms po2.fcr05.sr06.dal01.networklayer.com [66.228 8.223] 15 167 ms 167 ms 166 ms 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235] EU-servers: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 7 ms 7 ms 6 ms dsl-pribrasgw1-ff00c300-1.dhcp.inet.fi [88.195.0 .1] 3 13 ms 14 ms 13 ms tkucore01-o-2-3-0-0.datanet.tele.fi [141.208.206 .45] 4 18 ms 17 ms 17 ms hkiasbr2-o-4.datanet.tele.fi [141.208.25.18] 5 18 ms 17 ms 18 ms hls-b1-link.telia.net [213.248.68.209] 6 25 ms 24 ms 25 ms s-bb1-link.telia.net [80.91.249.0] 7 49 ms 49 ms 49 ms ffm-bb1-link.telia.net [80.91.248.53] 8 50 ms 56 ms 50 ms ffm-b12-link.telia.net [213.155.135.11] 9 51 ms 51 ms 49 ms xe-1-0-1.bbr01.xn01.fra01.networklayer.com [80.2 39.160.70] 10 48 ms 48 ms 47 ms ae7.bbr02.xn01.fra01.networklayer.com [50.97.18. 219] 11 50 ms 50 ms 50 ms ae1.bbr01.eq01.ams02.networklayer.com [50.97.18. 216] 12 47 ms 46 ms 46 ms ae5.dar01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [50.97.18. 237] 13 50 ms 50 ms 49 ms po1.fcr01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [159.253.1 58.131] 14 47 ms 48 ms 50 ms 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196]

Thunder Zephyr BetaMax. 5	Posted - 2012.07.06 20:21:00 - [101] - Quote Forums Veteran wrote: US: ~240ms EU: ~305ms From Brisbane. I still kill some fools. ;-) Reminds me of my PSTN modem days. wooty, fellow brissy boy P.S im getting about the same
kaslia Zumari Force Projection Caldari State 0	Posted - 2012.07.06 22:25:00 - [102] - Quote From Tokyo, Japan: Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235 (US): Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 150ms, Maximum = 157ms, Average = 153ms Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196 (EU): Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 269ms, Maximum = 290ms, Average = 279ms
Nubra Zoombra Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic 9	Posted - 2012.07.11 04:22:00 - [103] - Quote Im East Coast US (VA) us - 63ms avg eu-110ms avg *This is from a wireless G laptop Just thought I would share...... Not sure why...... LOL
Draig Brenin ZionTCD Legacy Rising 4	Posted - 2012.07.12 08:12:00 - [104] - Quote i'm getting EU 40 US 137 i'm from the uk
cSRT4 13	Posted - 2012.07.12 21:37:00 - [105] - Quote In Kansas City, Missouri, USA (July 12th, 2012) Avg. 35ms to US server Avg. 148ms to EU server I still get my arse handed to me.
Benny Mills Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2012.07.14 21:39:00 - [106] - Quote About once every two hours it seems the battle search never ends, one time i waited up to 30 min and no battle was found.I sometimes also get the "white ring" problem, Although the white ring is a rare problem for me. I know this is just beta and im not expecting a perfect game, I just have not seen another post like this. Im just happy reseting the game fixes all of my bugs. hurry and knock this **** out!!!!!! I want a full game!!!!!! I also noticed that my K/D has gone up and i am earning less skill points? Not fair for the better equipped. Maybe set aside a advanced dropsuit server with more Skill points avaiable?
Sw3RvE 25	Posted - 2012.07.15 16:05:00 - [107] - Quote Location: Louisiana ISP: Cox Communications DNS: Open DNS Bandwidth: 15-30 Mb Ping: [US] Server - 22ms Average [EU] Server - 143ms Average
Mr TamiyaCowboy Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation 121	Posted - 2012.07.20 11:19:00 - [108] - Quote UK Orange.com ISP 8meg connection. US : min 128ms max 134ms av 130ms UK: Min 28ms max 36ms av 32ms run from pc using same line and isp noted unusual lag all day on the 19th july and today the 20th july very very bad, un-playable on both UK and US. US seems to hang from start until its shunted overseas, then tracert flys the rest ( the ilford - oversea hop is the holdup) UK shows smooth hops, but lag ingame is un-playable, not my ps3 (no problems with MW3 multiplayer)
Tom Australi II MINE TECH INDUSTRIES Expoit This Mf's 2	Posted - 2012.07.21 12:06:00 - [109] - Quote suprising it it play able with my satilite internet. this is why EVE is the only mmo i can play. and currantly its shaped to 64kB. still killed a fair few people tho. I dare anyone to post a worse net conection Woop Woop, Australia US Pinging 173.193.23.235 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=1129ms TTL=115 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=1239ms TTL=115 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=1243ms TTL=115 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=1240ms TTL=115 Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 1129ms, Maximum = 1243ms, Average = 1212ms EU Pinging 159.253.143.196 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=1118ms TTL=111 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=1024ms TTL=111 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=1263ms TTL=111 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=1097ms TTL=111 Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 1024ms, Maximum = 1263ms, Average = 1125ms
sansey Inferno Inferno Inc 43	Posted - 2012.07.21 13:54:00 - [110] - Quote from Ukraine EU average 103ms US average 215ms


CCP Mindstar Doomheim 13	Posted - 2012.07.26 11:44:00 - [111] - Quote Just added the IP for our Asia server: 216.12.196.114 If you are in that part of the world, please do post your location as well as route / ping to that server. Cheers! Mindstar

Dewie Cheecham Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 677	Posted - 2012.07.26 12:11:00 - [112] - Quote Copenhagen, Denmark. 20Mbit unshaped cable connection. US: Average = 154ms EU: Average = 27ms Asia: Average = 350ms
Michael Erwin 1	Posted - 2012.07.26 15:06:00 - [113] - Quote This is from Tennessee USA. C:\Windows\system32>ping 173.193.23.235 Pinging 173.193.23.235 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=110 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=110 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=110 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=110 Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 45ms, Maximum = 46ms, Average = 45ms C:\Windows\system32>tracert 173.193.23.235 Tracing route to 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms ERWIN-FILES [192.168.1.1] 2 8 ms 9 ms 7 ms 10.225.32.1 3 9 ms 10 ms 8 ms dtr03kgpttn-tge-0-7-0-1.kgpt.tn.charter.com [96.34.68.68] 4 11 ms 8 ms 9 ms crr01kgpttn-tge-0-6-0-3.kgpt.tn.charter.com [96.34.68.66] 5 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms crr02kgpttn-tge-0-3-0-5.kgpt.tn.charter.com [96.34.71.195] 6 14 ms 13 ms 13 ms crr02spbgsc-tge-0-4-0-3.spbg.sc.charter.com [96.34.64.90] 7 17 ms 15 ms 19 ms bbr01spbgsc-tge-0-6-0-0.spbg.sc.charter.com [96.34.1.214] 8 26 ms 23 ms 23 ms bbr02atlnga-tge-0-1-0-7.atln.ga.charter.com [96.34.0.108] 9 28 ms 19 ms 19 ms prr02atlnga-tge-0-1-0-0.atln.ga.charter.com [96.34.3.137] 10 19 ms 19 ms 19 ms 50.97.16.28 11 45 ms 48 ms 44 ms ae13.bbr02.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com [173.192.18.134] 12 * * * Request timed out. 13 48 ms 48 ms 46 ms po1.fcr05.sr06.dal01.networklayer.com [66.228.118.221] 14 45 ms 45 ms 45 ms 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235] Trace complete. C:\Windows\system32>ping 159.253.143.196 Pinging 159.253.143.196 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=114 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=114 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=114 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=114 Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 112ms, Maximum = 113ms, Average = 112ms C:\Windows\system32>tracert 159.253.143.196 Tracing route to 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms ERWIN-FILES [192.168.1.1] 2 9 ms 7 ms 9 ms 10.225.32.1 3 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms dtr03kgpttn-tge-0-7-0-1.kgpt.tn.charter.com [96.34.68.68] 4 10 ms 9 ms 9 ms crr01kgpttn-tge-0-6-0-3.kgpt.tn.charter.com [96.34.68.66] 5 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms crr02kgpttn-tge-0-0-0-7.kgpt.tn.charter.com [96.34.71.83] 6 15 ms 13 ms 13 ms crr02spbgsc-tge-0-4-0-3.spbg.sc.charter.com [96.34.64.90] 7 14 ms 14 ms 15 ms crr01spbgsc-tge-0-4-0-2.spbg.sc.charter.com [96.34.64.87] 8 20 ms 15 ms 15 ms bbr01spbgsc-tge-0-3-0-0.spbg.sc.charter.com [96.34.1.48] 9 24 ms 23 ms 23 ms bbr02atlnga-tge-0-0-0-7.atln.ga.charter.com [96.34.0.40] 10 20 ms 19 ms 19 ms prr02atlnga-tge-0-1-0-0.atln.ga.charter.com [96.34.3.137] 11 18 ms 19 ms 21 ms 50.97.16.28 12 32 ms 31 ms 31 ms ae0.bbr01.eq01.wdc02.networklayer.com [173.192.18.152] 13 32 ms 31 ms 31 ms ae7.bbr02.eq01.wdc02.networklayer.com [173.192.18.195] 14 113 ms 113 ms 113 ms ae0.bbr01.eq01.ams02.networklayer.com [50.97.18.215] 15 113 ms 113 ms 113 ms ae5.dar02.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [50.97.18.239] 16 112 ms 114 ms 119 ms po2.fcr01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [159.253.158.133] 17 112 ms 115 ms 113 ms 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196] Trace complete. C:\Windows\system32>ping 216.12.196.114 Pinging 216.12.196.114 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 216.12.196.114: bytes=32 time=264ms TTL=48 Reply from 216.12.196.114: bytes=32 time=263ms TTL=48 Reply from 216.12.196.114: bytes=32 time=263ms TTL=48 Reply from 216.12.196.114: bytes=32 time=263ms TTL=48 Ping statistics for 216.12.196.114: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 263ms, Maximum = 264ms, Average = 263ms C:\Windows\system32>tracert 216.12.196.114 Tracing route to speedtest.sng01.softlayer.com [216.12.196.114] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms ERWIN-FILES [192.168.1.1] 2 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.225.32.1 3 9 ms 11 ms 9 ms dtr03kgpttn-tge-0-7-0-1.kgpt.tn.charter.com [96.34.68.68] 4 12 ms 9 ms 9 ms crr01kgpttn-tge-0-6-0-0.kgpt.tn.charter.com [96.34.68.64] 5 8 ms 9 ms 9 ms crr02kgpttn-tge-0-0-0-7.kgpt.tn.charter.com [96.34.71.83] 6 14 ms 13 ms 13 ms crr02spbgsc-tge-0-0-0-3.spbg.sc.charter.com [96.34.71.187] 7 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms bbr01spbgsc-tge-0-6-0-0.spbg.sc.charter.com [96.34.1.214] 8 21 ms 23 ms 23 ms bbr02atlnga-tge-0-0-0-7.atln.ga.charter.com [96.34.0.40] 9 19 ms 19 ms 19 ms prr02atlnga-tge-0-1-0-0.atln.ga.charter.com [96.34.3.137] 10 19 ms 20 ms 23 ms 50.97.16.28 11 46 ms 45 ms 45 ms ae13.bbr02.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com [173.192.18.134] 12 47 ms 45 ms 78 ms ae7.bbr01.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com [173.192.18.208] 13 79 ms 133 ms 78 ms ae0.bbr01.cs01.lax01.networklayer.com [173.192.18.141] 14 261 ms 263 ms 263 ms ae0.bbr01.eq01.sng02.networklayer.com [50.97.18.168] 15 264 ms 263 ms 263 ms ae5.dar02.sr03.sng01.networklayer.com [50.97.18.199] 16 264 ms 263 ms 263 ms po2.fcr01.sr03.sng01.networklayer.com [174.133.118.133] 17 263 ms 263 ms 263 ms speedtest.sng01.softlayer.com [216.12.196.114] Trace complete.
staaliy beta Algintal Core Gallente Federation 2	Posted - 2012.07.27 01:17:00 - [114] - Quote This may be over my 3G connection, but i think it shows how thankful i am for that new server Perth, Australia US: Average = 307.548 ms EU: Average = 458.067 ms Asia: Average = 105.835 ms And here i was thinking the US server was way more playable than the EU one.
bug1 1	Posted - 2012.07.27 09:16:00 - [115] - Quote Regional Victoria, Australia US: 220 ms EU: 334 ms Asia: 124 ms Was struggling to enjoy it on US server, much better for me now.
Dakunier Xadi Algintal Core Gallente Federation 0	Posted - 2012.07.27 09:47:00 - [116] - Quote from Germany EU : average 14ms USA: average 133ms Asia: average 335ms Internet Connection : 6 Mbps (Telefonica o2)
Clynn Fass Osmon Surveillance Caldari State 0	Posted - 2012.07.27 12:23:00 - [117] - Quote From New Zealand to: Pings US: 202ms EU: 316ms Asia: 310ms That's right, from NZ my best bet is the US server, not the Asian one. I assume the "sng01" in the name of the Asian endpoint means the Asian server is in Singapore? I don't know what Australia is like, but NZ tends to have a better connection to LA than Singapore. So US server for Oceania players then. Edit: I see that bug1 a couple of posts up has a much better ping from Aussie to the Asian address than I do. Makes sense since it looks like my packets get bounced around Telstra's network through Aussie to get to Singapore. Not much CCP can do about that I guess. :( Trace roots: US: Quote: Tracing route to 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms BoB.orcon [10.1.1.1] 2 37 ms 37 ms 36 ms llu.bng1.nct.orcon.net.nz [60.234.8.1] 3 36 ms 36 ms 36 ms xe-2-2-0.cre1.nct.orcon.net.nz [121.98.9.141] 4 38 ms 37 ms 37 ms 121.99.12.0 5 37 ms 37 ms 37 ms 203.167.240.158 6 173 ms 173 ms 172 ms 203.167.240.153 7 63 ms 62 ms 63 ms 203.167.233.10 8 182 ms 183 ms 182 ms i-0-6-4-0.tlot-core01.bx.telstraglobal.net [202.84.142.110] 9 185 ms 182 ms 183 ms i-3-5.tlot03.bi.telstraglobal.net [202.84.251.238] 10 * * * Request timed out. 11 232 ms 231 ms 231 ms ae19.bbr01.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com [173.192.18.140] 12 201 ms 201 ms 203 ms ae0.dar02.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com [173.192.18.253] 13 231 ms 231 ms 231 ms po2.fcr05.sr06.dal01.networklayer.com [66.228.118.223] 14 201 ms 202 ms 203 ms 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235] Trace complete. EU: Quote: Tracing route to 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms BoB.orcon [10.1.1.1] 2 38 ms 37 ms 37 ms llu.bng1.nct.orcon.net.nz [60.234.8.1] 3 36 ms 66 ms 36 ms xe-2-2-0.cre1.nct.orcon.net.nz [121.98.9.141] 4 39 ms 37 ms 37 ms 121.99.12.0 5 38 ms 40 ms 39 ms 203.167.240.158 6 173 ms 172 ms 172 ms 203.167.240.153 7 63 ms 62 ms 62 ms 203.167.233.10 8 182 ms 181 ms 181 ms i-0-0-4-1.tlot-core01.bx.telstraglobal.net [202.84.142.106] 9 183 ms 182 ms 182 ms i-3-5.tlot03.bi.telstraglobal.net [202.84.251.238] 10 * * * Request timed out. 11 231 ms 232 ms 231 ms ae19.bbr01.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com [173.192.18.140] 12 225 ms 226 ms 225 ms ae0.bbr01.eq01.chi01.networklayer.com [173.192.18.137] 13 248 ms 241 ms 242 ms ae0.bbr02.tl01.nyc01.networklayer.com [173.192.18.133] 14 310 ms 310 ms 309 ms ae0.bbr01.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com [50.97.18.205] 15 339 ms 340 ms 340 ms ae7.bbr02.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com [50.97.18.207] 16 346 ms 345 ms 357 ms ae0.bbr02.eq01.ams02.networklayer.com [50.97.18.211] 17 317 ms 316 ms 316 ms ae6.dar02.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [50.97.18.251] 18 346 ms 345 ms 344 ms po2.fcr01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [159.253.158.133] 19 316 ms 317 ms 316 ms 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196] Trace complete. Asia: Quote: Tracing route to speedtest.sng01.softlayer.com [216.12.196.114] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms BoB.orcon [10.1.1.1] 2 58 ms 37 ms 36 ms llu.bng1.nct.orcon.net.nz [60.234.8.1] 3 36 ms 36 ms 36 ms xe-2-2-0.cre1.nct.orcon.net.nz [121.98.9.141] 4 39 ms 37 ms 37 ms 121.99.12.0 5 72 ms 37 ms 37 ms 203.167.240.158 6 173 ms 173 ms 194 ms 203.167.240.153 7 63 ms 63 ms 62 ms 203.167.233.10 8 63 ms 62 ms 64 ms i-0-0-4-1.sydo-core02.bx.telstraglobal.net [202.84.142.149] 9 63 ms 63 ms 63 ms i-0-7-2-0.sydp-core01.bi.telstraglobal.net [202.84.223.21] 10 179 ms 179 ms 178 ms i-1-0-0.hkhh-core01.bx.telstraglobal.net [202.84.141.210] 11 180 ms 181 ms 181 ms i-0-10-0-0.hkhh01.bi.telstraglobal.net [202.84.154.218] 12 259 ms 271 ms 258 ms unknown.telstraglobal.net [134.159.100.98] 13 281 ms 281 ms 294 ms ae0.bbr02.eq01.sng02.networklayer.com [50.97.18.172] 14 307 ms 305 ms 306 ms ae7.bbr01.eq01.sng02.networklayer.com [50.97.18.170] 15 290 ms 289 ms 288 ms ae5.dar02.sr03.sng01.networklayer.com [50.97.18.199] 16 282 ms 281 ms 281 ms po2.fcr01.sr03.sng01.networklayer.com [174.133.118.133] 17 310 ms 311 ms 311 ms speedtest.sng01.softlayer.com [216.12.196.114] Trace complete.
Darky SI 232	Posted - 2012.07.28 11:49:00 - [118] - Quote I live in Middle East (Oman) and here is my ping test: Ping to [US] Average = 341ms Ping to [EU] Average = 294ms Ping to [Asia] Average = 129ms I am a bit disappointed from Asia server 129 ms is a lot sigh i guess ME will never see ~50 ms pings
Mr Vito Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 10	Posted - 2012.07.28 16:52:00 - [119] - Quote Located in Augusta,GA US Server Pinging 173.193.23.235 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=117 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=117 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=117 Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=117 Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 37ms, Maximum = 38ms, Average = 37ms EU Server Pinging 159.253.143.196 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=110 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=110 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=110 Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=110 Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 112ms, Maximum = 119ms, Average = 116ms Asia Server Pinging 216.12.196.114 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 216.12.196.114: bytes=32 time=258ms TTL=44 Reply from 216.12.196.114: bytes=32 time=258ms TTL=44 Reply from 216.12.196.114: bytes=32 time=260ms TTL=44 Reply from 216.12.196.114: bytes=32 time=259ms TTL=44 Ping statistics for 216.12.196.114: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 258ms, Maximum = 260ms, Average = 258ms
Ginger 555 Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 1	Posted - 2012.07.28 22:26:00 - [120] - Quote I am in China ( Shanghai ) and the Pings to the Asia Server... Pinging 216.12.196.114 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 216.12.196.114: bytes=32 time=335ms TTL=48 Reply from 216.12.196.114: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=48 Reply from 216.12.196.114: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=48 Reply from 216.12.196.114: bytes=32 time=276ms TTL=48 Ping statistics for 216.12.196.114: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 274ms, Maximum = 335ms, Average = 289ms So I am guessing its not in this country My best choice from China is still US server which pings around 160ms

Mason Kane Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 1	Posted - 2012.07.29 23:37:00 - [121] - Quote My tests during VERY quiet time in South Africa (01:30 in the morning) ping to US +-350ms ping to EU +-200ms ping to ASIA +-500 i still had quite a lot of lag spikes during the testing this weekend... playing on EU and US server
Helius Aphelion 5	Posted - 2012.07.30 11:34:00 - [122] - Quote US EST. More specifically, Florida. Lol US: 40ms EU: 128ms Asia: 261ms
pjster long Doomheim 28	Posted - 2012.08.01 18:47:00 - [123] - Quote Forums Veteran wrote: Orion-ji Tor wrote: lol I live in the US EST and TTL to US servers is 118 while TTL to EU servers is 111 Can you do a tracert to the US ip from you? 118 sounds pretty high from within the US. Acutally, I have averaged around 70-80 to the us server and I am on the West Coast... Sometimes it can go up to 500!!!!
xp3ll3d dust The Southern Legion 38	Posted - 2012.08.04 14:35:00 - [124] - Quote From Victoria, Australia: US: 220ms EU: 340ms Asia: 155ms Nice low pings from AU to Asia. Thanks!
Terrarim 12	Posted - 2012.08.05 21:07:00 - [125] - Quote From Kajang Malaysia (25k from Kuala Lumper) EU = 353 ms US = 277 ms Asia = 22 ms (no traffic on those servers when taken.
Trinciatore92 Maphia Clan Corporation CRONOS. 4	Posted - 2012.08.08 14:24:00 - [126] - Quote near Rome Italy (4 megabit connection) EU ~ 43 ms US ~ 150 ms Asia ~ 408 ms
Criest Pyrkin ZionTCD Legacy Rising 16	Posted - 2012.08.15 13:11:00 - [127] - Quote Colombia (Bogota) 4Mbit EU ~ 198 ms US ~ 115 ms Asia ~ 336 ms
Kovak Therim ZionTCD Legacy Rising 158	Posted - 2012.08.17 05:13:00 - [128] - Quote It looks like ~40 for a lot of us in the US. Missouri here with a 39 ms
Alaxen Dre Ex Morte Vita Big Bang Quantum 16	Posted - 2012.08.18 19:36:00 - [129] - Quote From London, England (75Mb) EU ~ 13 ms US ~ 120 ms Asia ~ 300ms I think the EU server must be in or near London? Hops are many though: Tracing route to 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.76.254 2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.30.254 3 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 217.32.145.133 4 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 217.32.145.174 5 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 213.120.156.18 6 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms 217.41.168.179 7 10 ms 7 ms 7 ms 217.41.168.107 8 8 ms 8 ms 7 ms acc1-10GigE-0-7-0-4.l-far.21cn-ipp.bt.net [109.159.249.74] 9 9 ms 7 ms 7 ms core1-te0-7-0-5.faraday.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.249.39] 10 15 ms 11 ms 11 ms host213-121-193-8.ukcore.bt.net [213.121.193.8] 11 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms transit1-pos9-0.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [62.6.201.118] 12 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms 166-49-211-157.eu.bt.net [166.49.211.157] 13 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms t2a1-ge4-0-0.uk-lon1.eu.bt.net [166.49.135.17] 14 9 ms 8 ms 9 ms bbr02.lon01.networklayer.com [195.66.237.183] 15 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms ae7.bbr02.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com [50.97.18.207] 16 14 ms 14 ms 13 ms ae0.bbr02.eq01.ams02.networklayer.com [50.97.18.211] 17 28 ms 15 ms 14 ms ae6.dar02.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [50.97.18.251] 18 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms po2.fcr01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [159.253.158.133] 19 14 ms 13 ms 14 ms 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196]
Ourors Doomheim 130	Posted - 2012.08.19 14:48:00 - [130] - Quote US: 32min, 39max, 34 average EU: 109min, 116max, 111ms average Asia: solid 259 ping this is at 10am on my college campus over WiFi i'm going to try again around "peak times" for the campus, which is usually around noon and around 8pm or so, and see if the latency is the same EDIT: just wanted to add, i have VERY SEVERE hit detection problems. worse than last build really. so i'm not sure if bad latency=bad hit detection is a valid statement


CCP Mindstar C C P C C P Alliance 35	Posted - 2012.08.21 13:11:00 - [131] - Quote Australia site added - 27.50.71.1

Kazeno Rannaa Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 145	Posted - 2012.08.21 16:35:00 - [132] - Quote Forums Veteran wrote: i'm US EST as well and i'm getting about, US: 50-60ms EU: 130+ms West coast getting avg of 20-30 ms for US and 180-220 for EU
420 machine Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 0	Posted - 2012.08.22 01:21:00 - [133] - Quote i want to play but cant cuz when i move it stops go stops go whys that ? and whats this ping thang ?
xp3ll3d dust The Southern Legion 38	Posted - 2012.08.22 10:28:00 - [134] - Quote CCP Mindstar wrote: Australia site added - 27.50.71.1 30ms Thank you! From Victoria, Australia: US: 220ms EU: 340ms Asia: 155ms Australia: 30ms
Gridboss BetaMax. 185	Posted - 2012.08.22 11:34:00 - [135] - Quote xp3ll3d dust wrote: CCP Mindstar wrote: Australia site added - 27.50.71.1 30ms Thank you! From Victoria, Australia: US: 220ms EU: 340ms Asia: 155ms Australia: 30ms Pretty much the same from Brisbane, except I've got 250 to Asia. Doesn't matter now with 23ms to Sydney
Taliel Demon Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 15	Posted - 2012.08.24 09:03:00 - [136] - Quote CCP Mindstar wrote: Australia site added - 27.50.71.1 Yay for an Australian server! I'm in Adelaide, South Australia. North America - 247ms Europe - 361ms Asia - 113ms Australia - 53ms
Taliel Demon Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 15	Posted - 2012.08.25 00:08:00 - [137] - Quote Despite the asian and Australian servers, instant battle is still putting me in US games? Wtf?!
Kyy Seiska Zumari Force Projection Caldari State 188	Posted - 2012.08.26 00:41:00 - [138] - Quote Location: Finland - N-EU US - 161ms TTL 110 EU - 45ms TTL 108 Asia - 311ms TTL 36 Aus - 350 TTL 43 No wonder the gameplay improved so much when I started playing exclusively on EU servers in the last build. But seems the US might just be bearable for these late night Dust sprees.
Seran Jinkar Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic 214	Posted - 2012.08.29 10:39:00 - [139] - Quote Sorry.. but shouldn't we be pinging the Singularity server now ?
Velvet Overkill 104	Posted - 2012.08.29 16:24:00 - [140] - Quote [North America] --- 173.193.23.235 ping statistics --- 60 packets transmitted, 60 received, 0% packet loss, time 59087ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.904/41.567/56.174/2.540 ms [Europe] --- 159.253.143.196 ping statistics --- 60 packets transmitted, 60 received, 0% packet loss, time 59085ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 141.648/144.316/160.245/3.020 ms [Asia] --- 216.12.196.114 ping statistics --- 60 packets transmitted, 60 received, 0% packet loss, time 59069ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 247.534/250.615/261.977/3.141 ms [Australia] --- 27.50.71.1 ping statistics --- 60 packets transmitted, 60 received, 0% packet loss, time 59075ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 238.117/241.955/266.776/5.070 ms

Fassnn Osmon Surveillance Caldari State 3	Posted - 2012.09.02 04:12:00 - [141] - Quote Some more data for you west coast united states to your US server, decent response time for an FPS if you ask me 2 3 ms 5 ms 4 ms ip68-6-12-188.sd.sd.cox.net [68.6.12.188] 3 7 ms 7 ms 4 ms fed1sysc01-get0004.sd.sd.cox.net [68.6.8.78] 4 22 ms 16 ms 16 ms paltbprj01-ae2.0.rd.pt.cox.net [68.1.2.98] 5 33 ms 31 ms 34 ms 50.97.16.17 6 30 ms 29 ms 30 ms ae3.bbr02.eq01.sjc02.networklayer.com [173.192.18.242] 7 26 ms 26 ms 26 ms ae0.bbr02.cs01.lax01.networklayer.com [173.192.18.151] 8 38 ms 40 ms 63 ms ae7.bbr01.cs01.lax01.networklayer.com [173.192.18.166] 9 46 ms 43 ms * ae19.bbr01.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com [173.192.18.140] 10 48 ms 49 ms 107 ms ae0.dar01.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com [173.192.18.211] 11 44 ms 54 ms 57 ms po1.fcr05.sr06.dal01.networklayer.com [66.228.118.221] 12 48 ms 44 ms 44 ms 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235]
TseihShe Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State 5	Posted - 2012.09.03 13:36:00 - [142] - Quote Ping statistics for 27.50.71.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 18ms, Maximum = 19ms, Average = 18ms From Victoria, Australia. \o/
REAPER0D THE DEATH Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic 0	Posted - 2012.09.08 04:37:00 - [143] - Quote noticing bad lag burps around tanks... seems to happen around heavys as well especially when launching rockets...
Corax D 2	Posted - 2012.09.10 04:47:00 - [144] - Quote I'm in Greece and I've got a nice 57ms average to the EU servers and a 177ms average to the USA ones. I only pinged the USA ones because everyone else was doing it. Is there any reason for us EU players to be concerned with our latency to the USA servers? (e.g. because that's where the EVE servers are etc.?)
Rashawn Wreezy Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic 0	Posted - 2012.09.10 05:20:00 - [145] - Quote From U.S. Indiana US - 50.301/221.533/388.937/142.536ms EU - 115.233/288.708/438.045/151.306ms Asia - 263.075/296.017/432.937/47.181ms AUS - 235.540/391.308/605.158/154.277ms
spccarmona 5	Posted - 2012.09.13 18:31:00 - [146] - Quote I'm in Florida, I pinged our server and it says 309ms, TTL=107... is this good, I really have no idea!
Hammer Fury Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 0	Posted - 2012.09.16 08:00:00 - [147] - Quote Pinging works fine for me, I get an average of 62ms. I'm in North Dakota, USA. Tracert, on the other hand... I think I may have spotted part of the problem with the lag issues. Hops 6 and 7 time out. 5 is far2-core-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.160.5], and 8 is cer-edge-17.inet.qwest.net [67.14.8.90]. Whatever routers are between the two seem to be having issues.
Talruum Tezztarozza Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 74	Posted - 2012.09.16 08:40:00 - [148] - Quote From Thailand here US 265ms 15 jump EU 303ms 20 jump Asia 56ms 13 jump Aussie 268ms 19 jump To be expected, I guess.
Icephr34k 0	Posted - 2012.09.16 23:33:00 - [149] - Quote From Texas Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235 (US) min/max/avg 24ms/26ms/24ms Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196 (EU) min/max/avg 145ms/147ms/145ms Ping statistics for 216.12.196.114 (Asia) min/max/avg 245ms/247ms/246ms Ping statistics for 27.50.71.1 (Australia) min/max/avg 244ms/251ms/246ms Kinda figured my ping would be a little better for US since I'm basically around the corner form the server (not literally but I'm close, or so I've been told) But then again....I'm not fond of my ISP and latency is one of the main reasons why. Thanks for the info.
GAGAH-BOY BRAZIL 66	Posted - 2012.09.17 02:46:00 - [150] - Quote Plzzz add Brasil IP

Talaryes Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact 8	Posted - 2012.09.19 13:37:00 - [151] - Quote From Singapore (where the Asia server is residing WOOT): 173.193.23.235 (North America): Minimum = 229ms, Maximum = 232ms, Average = 230ms 159.253.143.196 (Europe): Minimum = 322ms, Maximum = 334ms, Average = 330ms 216.12.196.114 (Singapore): Minimum = 4ms, Maximum = 4ms, Average = 4ms 27.50.71.1 (Australia): Minimum = 332ms, Maximum = 349ms, Average = 339ms
Conraire Zumari Force Projection Caldari State 52	Posted - 2012.09.21 02:02:00 - [152] - Quote Mines not bad either, especially considering I'm on ADSL, and I'm in east Texas. 173.193.23.235 (North America): 11 hops on tracert, two of which are my wifi/gigabit router, and the router part of my dsl modem. Minumum =21,s. Maximum = 70ms, Average = 33ms in fact all but 1 of the packets came back at 21ms 159.253.143.196 (Europe): Minimum = 139ms, Maximum = 140ms, Average = 139ms 216.12.196.114 (Singapore): Minimum = 242ms, Maximum = 253ms, Average = 248ms 27.50.71.1 (Australia): Minimum = 223ms, Maximum = 225ms, Average = 223ms And I guess according to the tracert the NA server is in Dallas, which literally puts me about 150ish miles from it.
Shas-O Osmon Surveillance Caldari State 0	Posted - 2012.09.30 09:56:00 - [153] - Quote Here's my ping stats FYI Dunmow Essex UK --- 159.253.143.196 ping statistics --- 57 packets transmitted, 57 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 34.436/37.589/97.687/8.363 ms traceroute 159.253.143.196 traceroute to 159.253.143.196 (159.253.143.196), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 theguvnor (192.168.19.100) 1.837 ms 1.390 ms 1.452 ms 2 192.168.18.100 (192.168.18.100) 1.818 ms 2.355 ms 1.828 ms 3 host-92-16-152-1.as13285.net (92.16.152.1) 13.568 ms 14.086 ms 13.328 ms 4 host-78-151-225-193.static.as13285.net (78.151.225.193) 15.835 ms 16.592 ms 15.639 ms 5 host-78-151-225-188.static.as13285.net (78.151.225.188) 16.632 ms host-78-151-225-200.static.as13285.net (78.151.225.200) 16.341 ms host-78-151-225-188.static.as13285.net (78.151.225.188) 16.888 ms 6 xe-11-2-0-rt001.the.as13285.net (62.24.240.13) 28.393 ms 27.729 ms 27.718 ms 7 host-78-144-1-65.as13285.net (78.144.1.65) 17.308 ms host-78-144-1-59.as13285.net (78.144.1.59) 28.383 ms host-78-144-1-65.as13285.net (78.144.1.65) 16.691 ms 8 host-78-144-0-207.as13285.net (78.144.0.207) 65.033 ms host-78-144-1-137.as13285.net (78.144.1.137) 16.926 ms host-78-144-1-135.as13285.net (78.144.1.135) 17.383 ms 9 bbr02.lon01.networklayer.com (195.66.237.183) 17.184 ms 17.900 ms 16.559 ms 10 ae7.bbr02.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com (50.97.18.207) 34.733 ms 28.978 ms 23.401 ms 11 ae0.bbr02.eq01.ams02.networklayer.com (50.97.18.211) 33.187 ms 29.652 ms 33.566 ms 12 ae6.dar02.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com (50.97.18.251) 27.881 ms ae6.dar01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com (50.97.18.249) 29.260 ms ae6.dar02.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com (50.97.18.251) 34.644 ms 13 po1.fcr01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com (159.253.158.131) 34.715 ms 34.218 ms 34.379 ms 14 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com (159.253.143.196) 29.049 ms 34.355 ms 28.723 ms
ramer arda ZionTCD Legacy Rising 12	Posted - 2012.10.02 21:27:00 - [154] - Quote there is NO EU located sever its in the US 159.253.143.196 this is a US server not EU WERE is our dedcated sever all back a d bus again!!!
nietsche wannabe Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic 1	Posted - 2012.10.03 14:26:00 - [155] - Quote US 51 Europe 90 I have terrible lag in these matches. I can't play at all. It's already linked to singularity. Has CCP done or mentioned anything to the effect on why the lag is terrible with the newest build?
Ani X United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION 58	Posted - 2012.10.21 16:46:00 - [156] - Quote Europe --- 159.253.143.196 ping statistics --- 50 packets transmitted, 50 received, 0% packet loss, time 49057ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.313/45.938/123.524/20.420 ms North America --- 173.193.23.235 ping statistics --- 50 packets transmitted, 50 received, 0% packet loss, time 49058ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 151.126/159.153/226.036/15.790 ms I live in Germany. In game I'm experiencing massive FPS drops very often. Sometimes I think I also experience lags, but not sure.
evilfucare Algintal Core Gallente Federation 0	Posted - 2012.11.02 11:55:00 - [157] - Quote I played and I played and I played wow I am hooked on the game still got some major glitches . I was running from my spawn point to try to capture A ran up some little hill next to a wall got stuck there until some guy come over and shot me boy I was pissed. Got big enemy tanks driving by while I'm trying everything I could to get unstuck never happened. I was trying to have fun but the game play messed it up for me again, I was so pissed I shut that thing off mid game and I bet I don't play that game again for a day. See I spawned just before that and got wasted by a guy with a Gatling gun who was just waiting for my team to spawn so he could waste about a million bucks worth of suits and all the fixings. That spawn killing stuff is not a fair game and should not be allowed. Thanks again guys now I'm pissed at the world again. So for all you little spawn killers I say here is to you sucking my balls . One day when they finally get the glitches out of this game I will get back. Until then I'll be bitching big time. I made like all these big sp points and all this ISK to up grade my anti armor gun I spent it all on these skills to get a better gun only problem is the stupid gun you gave us out the box was better than the upgraded ones thanks again I just love wasting my whole day to make a ton of loot to spend on some weak ass donkey ** bullshit. Can you tell I'm upset? This game is messing with my sanity. Yesterday I was real cool with the game but today I'm wanting to toss my controller through my TV . I spawned once today and I see a heavy suit guy with a Gatling gun I start shooting him hardly did anything but tell him where I was he turned my screen glitched I'm dead his two bullets were a lot meaner than my 60 I shot him with . Oh let me tell you I like the sniper rifle I get great head shots sometimes but most of the time I shoot once hit the guy , twice I hit the guy third time I hit him again then the guy runs off while I reload his health comes right back he turns shoots me one time I'm done. I've never seen a three shot rifle before who is the genus who thought of that? Good news, when I finally had enough of this I will punt my ps3 though the wall and toss my controller through my big TV then I will be done with this glitchy game seems like you programed it to cheat me every time. I think you like said look its him let's with him some more. I spend all this cash on a tank then I spend a ton more fixing it up with modules then as soon as I call it in the torrent moves so slow I don't get one shot off before I get blown up before I even get off one shot. Must be you got to pay some *** to turn the torrent alittle faster or maybe I just bought the slow tank so after I play for a few more months I can buy the skill then I can buy the guns then I can buy another ** up slow tank that moves allittle faster would be nice to at least get one shot before I have to start all over with nothing. Why do people sit under the drop ship and shoot your ass out the air so before you can land your dead? I was up on the ship I see them down there waiting so I try to shoot them from the ship it won't shoot through the force field yet they can shoot you before you get off that ship. Who thought that would be cool? You should give them a missile launcher up there so you can try to fight back. I ain't real sure yet weather I'll play this game every day or if I take a an AK and go shoot everyone at McDonalds. That's how I felt today major disappointment this is PlayStation its supposed to be the best system why can't we get a game that plays as good as halo? I thought this was that game but then I played it . I understand its a beta, but can you please fix the bugs? There are plenty of other guys out there that you can cheat why does it got to be me everytime? Why no matter what I pull out does it always kill my ass in two shots . Why is every other guy got better guns than me? My main rifle is got no range it don't do much damage I put 60 shots into the other guy but then he shoots at me once or twice then my guys falls down every time. So to me it looks like everyone has a more powerful gun than me? Please push your button on your computer make my guy a little stronger? Is it just me or does everyone in this game got more powerful guns than me? Why did you send me this game only to ** with my head?;thanks for reading this guys now push the button and take you voodo off my guy.
Gage Bouren KNIGHTZ OF THE ROUND 1	Posted - 2012.11.05 22:16:00 - [158] - Quote Hey If you don't mind I need some of your attention CCP and all DEVs it's time to stop the data flooders in dust. Data flooding is illegal and it's time to fight back!! PLEASE readOn IRC, the most common type of flood is text flood. This happens when someone sends a lot of text in a channel or a private message, causing the chat window to scroll a lot in a very short time. This could be caused by pasting a large amount of text from the clipboard, using large pop-up texts or poorly written scripts to show colorful text-images or huge letters, flowers, puppies, cows, teddybears and so on, or, in some rare situations, by a lagged server. Such a large amount of text or number of lines in a few seconds are considered annoying by the channel operators, and some run protection bots which automatically kick a person who sends more than 4 or 5 lines or more than a couple hundred characters in less than a few seconds. Also, the IRC server itself has a protection limit; if someone sends more characters than this limit in a second, the server will automatically disconnect the person with the message "Excess flood." Keep in mind this server flood protection, especially if you have some sort of fancy script or program which, for example, replies automatically when someone types !ping or !seen, or plays games in channel. Even if you don't have such a script, your IRC client (mIRC, for example) automatically replies to certain commands sent by others: PING, VERSION, FINGER, to name a few. These automatic replies can be dangerous, because some people can exploit a poorly written script and make you get disconnected. How can they do that? Well, let's suppose that the server limit is set to 400 characters per second, and let's imagine that when someone types "!coke", your script automatically says "Free soft drinks for everyone! Take your pick: Coke, Diet Coke, Sprite, Pepsi." What if a person who tries to disconnect you types "!coke" 6 times in one second? Your script will send that reply 6 times as well, in another second. But the person sent only 5 characters six times, that is 30 characters in one second; on the other hand, your script send 77 characters six times in the same second, which makes 462 characters in one second. And that's more than the maximum of 400 characters accepted by the server in one second, and you will be instantly disconnected. mIRC Flood Protection In later versions, mIRC became smarter and can now be set to automatically prevent you from flooding the server by sending more characters in one second than the maximum allowed limit. By the way, it's a good idea to always install the latest available version of a program to benefit from old bugs being corrected and from new features being installed; also, keep in mind that if you have a problem, the author of the program will not offer support for older versions. To enable flood protection, open the Options page (File menu in some versions, Tools menu in newer versions), expand the IRC section in the tree list on the left, and select the Flooding sub-section. At the right, check all the boxes. After enabling this setting, when you paste a large amount of text, mIRC will send it with delays between the lines, so you won't exceed the server's limit; also, if someone sends you a CTCP PING request, your mIRC will answer it and then ignore further PINGs from that person for 10 seconds, thus preventing the situation when the person repeatedly pings you, trying to make you disconnect. The flood settings may not help if you have a fancy script downloaded from somewhere on the Internet. Sure, it has nice menus and commands, jokes, colorful messages and a lot of things built-in, but in most cases these scripts lack the mechanisms to prevent flooding the server with automatic messages. Besides, who knows what could be hidden in all that code? Did you know that most scripts contain backdoors or IRC viruses which cannot be detected by normal antivirus programs or protected by firewalls, but allow other people to take control of your computer? I'd rather give up on old jokes and annoying colorful messages than have someone looking through my emails and personal files without my knowledge!
Gage Bouren KNIGHTZ OF THE ROUND 1	Posted - 2012.11.05 22:17:00 - [159] - Quote If someone is sending you a lot of private messages, notices, DCC requests or various CTCPs but you don't have any script to automatically reply to them, don't worry; you cannot be flooded. Eventually, the person will trigger the server's protection limit and will get disconnected. Until then, you can simply ignore the person's nickname with the command: /ignore nickname 3 . Don't forget the 3 at the end, it will make mIRC ignore the person's messages (hide them) even if he/she changes nickname or reconnects to the Internet provider with another IP address. However, if there are many nicknames sending you messages, notices, DCC requests or CTCPs, they might be "flood bots," each of them is sending you short messages, but summed together it will create a lot of traffic through your Internet connection, even if you ignore them all. The solution for protecting your connection is to ask the IRC server to completely block messages from those nicknames; this can be done with the command /silence nickname . Remember that on Undernet, you can silence maximum 15 nicknames at any time, so if there are more nicknames attacking you with messages, use /silence * to ignore all messages from all people on IRC. If you are a channel operator, this will give you time to kick and ban them all, then change your nickname so they cannot find you and send you messages any longer; afterwards, revert the message block with the command /silence -* . Packet Flooding Another type of flood is only indirectly related to IRC; a person finds out your computer's address (either the numeric IP address or the one with letters) by /whois yournickname, then tries to attack it directly by filling your Internet connection with unnecessary traffic. As a result, you will find yourself unabl
Gage Bouren KNIGHTZ OF THE ROUND 1	Posted - 2012.11.05 22:21:00 - [160] - Quote Please re post applications specific protocols i need to forward for my ps3 so I can not be affected by the data flooders im tired of them so many players have the ip addresess you have posted for countries and tons of other things so since you gave people the power to DATA FLOOD give us players in detail FIREWALL SETTING AND ADVANCED FIREWALL SETTINGs for your game. its getting bad

Gage Bouren KNIGHTZ OF THE ROUND 1	Posted - 2012.11.06 03:10:00 - [161] - Quote CCP PLEASE RESPOND
Gage Bouren KNIGHTZ OF THE ROUND 1	Posted - 2012.11.06 03:11:00 - [162] - Quote TO MY POSTS ON PAGE (8)


Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.