| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
![[Veteran_Klokvarg Adhocrat]](https://forums.dust514.com/themes/ccpDust514/dust-avatar-128.png "[Veteran_Klokvarg Adhocrat]")
[Veteran_Klokvarg Adhocrat]
0
   |
Posted - 2012.05.27 17:46:00 -
[31] - Quote
I experience quite a bit of lag in game, even on US servers.
(from Seattle area)
US: 58ms
EU: 171ms
for reference
eve server: 179ms
dust forums: 182ms (yet minutes to load pages) |
[Veteran_Libertine Mark I]
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 17:48:00 -
[32] - Quote
From Seattle; USA
MIn / Max (in ms)
EU: ~166
US: ~52
no packet loss
|
[Veteran_Kraig Ghist]
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:43:00 -
[33] - Quote
Though, this is good to be able to ping the server from the pc, but the beta is on the ps3, people have different network set-up for their consoles including myself  |
[Veteran_Grig Marnis]
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 03:33:00 -
[34] - Quote
From Sydney AU here and the pings are something of an issue for us here. Are there Oceanic servers planned?
I'm not saying it's unplayable but going to be hard to compete against others with sub 100 pings.
EU: 299
US: 213 |
[Veteran_Khulam]
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 03:34:00 -
[35] - Quote
40ms for the US server from Orlando FL.
I have a feeling it has something to do with PSN itself.... |
[Veteran_tehmajordust]
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 05:57:00 -
[36] - Quote
US: 218
EU: 340
Im from New Zealand and both seem pretty unplayable due to lag and frame rate issues |
[Veteran_Bazza McDonald]
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 11:44:00 -
[37] - Quote
Hey Gang, Im from South Australia and my ping data is:
Pinging 159.253.143.196 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=1601ms TTL=103
Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=389ms TTL=103
Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=398ms TTL=103
Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=407ms TTL=103
Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 389ms, Maximum = 1601ms, Average = 698ms
AND:
Pinging 173.193.23.235 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=633ms TTL=111
Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=321ms TTL=111
Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=320ms TTL=111
Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=328ms TTL=111
Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 320ms, Maximum = 633ms, Average = 400ms
Im running Wireless broadband from 30m of cable attached to a directional antenna thats 10m above the ground
in an area where we are not supposed to get internet apart from dial up or satellite, so Im not complaining lol |
[Veteran_Raven Tesio]
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 11:58:00 -
[38] - Quote
London, UK
100 Mb/s Fiber Optic
EU: 26ms (114 TTL)
US: 148ms (114 TTL)
(Windows 7)
as Reference EVE: 20ms (118 TTL)
PS3
NAT Type 2 (Moderate) [My Xbox 360 has the Unrestricted NAT assigned to it]
Down: 7.6Mbps
Up: 0.9Mbps
This bitrates should be a little higher, but as I've set each WiFi (Type-N) connection to a max of 10Mbps as to prevent any one device taking the whole bandwidth ... this is more than enough to play any other online games.
To be honest the performance issues don't seem to be based to much on the latency of the game, although without studing the netcode you guys are using difficult to make a truely informed decision about that; still I've noticed in games with smaller populations (<16) the game is playable and with populations very small (<8) it is as smooth as most other FPS games, like Battlefield 3 or Killzone 3. |
[Veteran_Orion-ji Tor]
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 20:49:00 -
[39] - Quote
CCP Mindstar wrote:Orion-ji Tor wrote:lol I live in the US EST and TTL to US servers is 118 while TTL to EU servers is 111 Can you do a tracert to the US ip from you? 118 sounds pretty high from within the US.
Sorry, I've been to busy playing  , but here are the results
Tracing route to 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 7 ms 7 ms 8 ms 10.208.0.1
2 7 ms 7 ms 8 ms gig1-0-0.653.wlmgncilm-rtr1.ec.rr.com [24.25.32.
56]
3 12 ms 13 ms 14 ms 24.93.64.108
4 21 ms 23 ms 23 ms 107.14.19.20
5 19 ms 19 ms 18 ms 107.14.19.133
6 19 ms 19 ms 18 ms 66.109.11.246
7 31 ms 34 ms 35 ms ae0.bbr01.tl01.atl01.networklayer.com [173.192.1
8.153]
8 53 ms 46 ms 46 ms ae13.bbr02.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com [173.192.
18.134]
9 47 ms 46 ms 54 ms ae0.dar02.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com [173.192.1
8.213]
10 46 ms 46 ms 46 ms po2.fcr05.sr06.dal01.networklayer.com [66.228.11
8.223]
11 47 ms 53 ms 47 ms 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235]
Trace complete. |
[Veteran_CCP Mindstar]
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 00:08:00 -
[40] - Quote
Orion-ji Tor wrote: 11 47 ms 53 ms 47 ms 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235]
Looks like its ~50ms instead of 111, so that is good and more in line with what is expected.
|
|
|
[Veteran_Thorolf Kveldulfson]
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 11:04:00 -
[41] - Quote
Swindon
Wiltshire
UK
To Eu servers
Pinging 159.253.143.196 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=116
Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=116
Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=116
Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=116
Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 22ms, Maximum = 27ms, Average = 24ms
Tracing route to 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 19 ms 7 ms 16 ms cpc2-swin16-2-0-gw.3-1.cable.virginmedia.com [82
.22.24.1]
2 9 ms 11 ms 11 ms brhm-core-2b-ae3-3499.network.virginmedia.net [8
1.110.128.181]
3 27 ms 59 ms 10 ms brhm-bb-1b-ae8-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.253
.174.77]
4 14 ms 11 ms 10 ms nrth-bb-1a-as4-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.253
.185.105]
5 16 ms 14 ms 14 ms nrth-bb-1b-ae0-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.253
.185.118]
6 16 ms 30 ms 15 ms tele-ic-4-ae0-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.253.
174.18]
7 18 ms 19 ms 15 ms ldn-b4-link.telia.net [213.248.70.29]
8 30 ms 18 ms 15 ms ldn-bb1-link.telia.net [80.91.247.91]
9 19 ms 19 ms 17 ms ldn-b3-link.telia.net [80.91.247.25]
10 17 ms 18 ms 15 ms xe-1-0-1.bbr01.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com [213.
248.97.226]
11 21 ms 48 ms 20 ms ae7.bbr02.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com [50.97.18.
207]
12 23 ms 22 ms 22 ms ae0.bbr02.eq01.ams02.networklayer.com [50.97.18.
211]
13 42 ms 29 ms 23 ms ae6.dar01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [50.97.18.
249]
14 25 ms 22 ms 25 ms po1.fcr01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [159.253.1
58.131]
15 24 ms 23 ms 23 ms 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196]
I get more lag on these forums than I do in game so far |
[Veteran_Marbin Nikia]
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 12:49:00 -
[42] - Quote
Tracing route to 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 4 ms 4 ms 3 ms CISCO12876 [192.168.1.1]
2 13 ms 14 ms 22 ms ip72-204-0-1.fv.ks.cox.net [72.204.0.1]
3 15 ms 13 ms 13 ms wsip-70-182-122-93.ks.ks.cox.net [70.182.122.93]
4 15 ms 12 ms 13 ms wsip-70-182-120-249.ks.ks.cox.net [70.182.120.24
9]
5 26 ms 133 ms 102 ms kscydsrj01-ae0.rd.ks.cox.net [70.183.71.85]
6 23 ms 23 ms 23 ms 70.183.71.61
7 32 ms 36 ms 34 ms chgobprj01-ae2.0.rd.ch.cox.net [68.1.0.216]
8 151 ms 104 ms 99 ms ae20.bbr01.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com [173.192.
18.136]
9 125 ms 109 ms * ae0.dar01.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com [173.192.1
8.253]
10 100 ms 101 ms 102 ms po2.fcr05.sr06.dal01.networklayer.com [66.228.11
8.223]
11 124 ms 101 ms 100 ms 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235]
Trace complete. |
[Veteran_Dougasa Kahoud]
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 18:29:00 -
[43] - Quote
Ping from Frankfurt am Main (Germany)
to EU Server : 46 ms
to US Server : 166 ms |
[Veteran_SuperMido]
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 19:57:00 -
[44] - Quote
I live in New Jersey USA, here are my results:
[US IP]: Min: 79mS Max: 80mS Avg: 79mS
[EU IP]: Min: 111mS Max: 111mS Avg: 111mS |
[Veteran_Ilya Kruchkov]
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 21:16:00 -
[45] - Quote
US=162ms
EU=57ms
Russia, Moscow |
[Veteran_ultramrin]
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 04:35:00 -
[46] - Quote
US: 243
EU: 111
Russia, Surgut |
[Veteran_Oposum]
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 17:12:00 -
[47] - Quote
Southern Germany (BaW++, Lkr. Tuttlingen)
[EU] = 25ms
[US] = 145ms |
[Veteran_Alex Jammer]
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 04:43:00 -
[48] - Quote
Russia, Rostov-Don
[EU]=76ms
[US]=190ms |
[Veteran_Skar De Vil]
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 12:28:00 -
[49] - Quote
Russia, Yekaterinburg
[EU]=93ms
[US]=235ms |
[Veteran_Tykjen76]
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 12:28:00 -
[50] - Quote
Pinging from Troms++, Norway.
ping 173.193.23.235
Pinging 173.193.23.235 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=111
Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=111
Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=111
Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=111
Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 178ms, Maximum = 179ms, Average = 178ms
ping 159.253.143.196
Pinging 159.253.143.196 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=111
Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=111
Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=111
Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=111
Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 60ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 60ms
|
|
|
[Veteran_Anshur Fulkrieg]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 19:02:00 -
[51] - Quote
From my Pc to the EU server.
Host:
IP: 159.253.143.196
Sent: 24
Received: 22
Lost: 2
Loss Rate: 8.33 %
Min Time: 42 ms
Max Time: 51 ms
Avg Time: 43 ms
Avg TTL: 111
From my PC to the US server.
Host:
IP: 173.193.23.235
Sent: 24
Received: 12
Lost: 12
Loss Rate: 50.00 %
Min Time: 156 ms
Max Time: 164 ms
Avg Time: 159 ms
Avg TTL: 109
|
[Veteran_Nebuzar Draconis]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.02 05:25:00 -
[52] - Quote
My ping from the PC is great (134ms - US) but it's not the same for the PS3 which is lagging horribly during matches, and even in the MQ, I think it's partly cause of the map size itself and all the stuff it's trying to sync. Dont get me wrong i love a large map but i think they're going to have to be toned down a bit for this to actually be up to quality. |
[Veteran_Unmei Umida]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.02 08:08:00 -
[53] - Quote
Ping with tracert.
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7600]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Users\Chris>tracert 173.193.23.235
Tracing route to 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms 1 ms <1 ms adsl-67-117-30-134.dsl.chic01.pacbell.net [67.11
7.30.134]
2 11 ms 13 ms 11 ms adsl-67-117-31-254.dsl.chic01.pacbell.net [67.11
7.31.254]
3 11 ms 11 ms 11 ms dist1-vlan50.chi2ca.sbcglobal.net [67.126.80.66]
4 13 ms 11 ms 11 ms 151.164.53.102
5 34 ms 33 ms 33 ms ggr7.sffca.ip.att.net [12.122.114.13]
6 34 ms 35 ms 35 ms 192.205.36.2
7 * * * Request timed out.
8 35 ms 35 ms 35 ms ae11.bbr01.eq01.sjc02.networklayer.com [65.113.3
2.242]
9 36 ms 35 ms 35 ms ae7.bbr02.eq01.sjc02.networklayer.com [173.192.1
8.165]
10 44 ms 43 ms 43 ms ae0.bbr02.cs01.lax01.networklayer.com [173.192.1
8.151]
11 44 ms 43 ms 43 ms ae7.bbr01.cs01.lax01.networklayer.com [173.192.1
8.166]
12 74 ms 72 ms 72 ms ae19.bbr01.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com [173.192.
18.140]
13 73 ms 73 ms 76 ms ae0.dar01.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com [173.192.1
8.211]
14 74 ms 72 ms 72 ms po1.fcr05.sr06.dal01.networklayer.com [66.228.11
8.221]
15 73 ms 72 ms 72 ms 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235]
Trace complete.
C:\Users\Chris>ping 173.193.23.235
Pinging 173.193.23.235 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=113
Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=113
Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=113
Reply from 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=113
Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 72ms, Maximum = 74ms, Average = 73ms
C:\Users\Chris>tracert 159.253.143.196
Tracing route to 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms 1 ms <1 ms adsl-67-117-30-134.dsl.chic01.pacbell.net [67.11
7.30.134]
2 13 ms 9 ms 9 ms adsl-67-117-31-254.dsl.chic01.pacbell.net [67.11
7.31.254]
3 13 ms 11 ms 11 ms 63.200.183.194
4 13 ms 11 ms 11 ms 151.164.53.104
5 35 ms 33 ms 36 ms 12.122.200.9
6 35 ms 35 ms 35 ms 192.205.33.46
7 108 ms 115 ms 108 ms nyk-bb1-link.telia.net [80.91.252.152]
8 205 ms 179 ms 181 ms ldn-bb1-link.telia.net [80.91.248.202]
9 179 ms 179 ms 180 ms ldn-b3-link.telia.net [80.91.249.170]
10 182 ms 182 ms 181 ms xe-1-0-1.bbr01.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com [213.
248.97.226]
11 168 ms 167 ms 169 ms ae7.bbr02.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com [50.97.18.
207]
12 173 ms 173 ms 173 ms ae0.bbr02.eq01.ams02.networklayer.com [50.97.18.
211]
13 178 ms 175 ms 177 ms ae6.dar02.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [50.97.18.
251]
14 173 ms 173 ms 173 ms po2.fcr01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [159.253.1
58.133]
15 176 ms 173 ms 173 ms 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196]
Trace complete.
C:\Users\Chris>ping 159.253.143.196
Pinging 159.253.143.196 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=183ms TTL=105
Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=105
Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=105
Reply from 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=105
Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 171ms, Maximum = 183ms, Average = 178ms
|
[Veteran_Sarge Colgreen]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.02 17:19:00 -
[54] - Quote
Ping and Tracert from Brazil
Microsoft Windows [vers+úo 6.1.7600]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. Todos os direitos reservados.
C:\Users\Alexandre>tracert 173.193.23.235
Rastreando a rota para 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235]
com no m+íximo 30 saltos:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms Broadcom.Home [192.168.1.1]
2 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms Broadcom.Home [192.168.1.1]
3 8 ms 7 ms 8 ms 177.133.128.1.dynamic.adsl.gvt.net.br [177.133.1
28.1]
4 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 186.215.223.225.static.host.gvt.net.br [186.215.
223.225]
5 11 ms 11 ms 11 ms gvt-te-7-1-rc01.rjo.gvt.net.br [189.59.244.169]
6 47 ms 47 ms 47 ms gvt-po-1-0-0-rc01.sdr.gvt.net.br [189.59.244.78]
7 46 ms 47 ms 46 ms 187.115.216.174.static.host.gvt.net.br [187.115.
216.174]
8 160 ms 160 ms 161 ms Xe0-1-0-0-grtssatw1.red.telefonica-wholesale.net
[84.16.7.157]
9 150 ms 151 ms 158 ms Xe5-2-0-0-grtfortw1.red.telefonica-wholesale.net
[84.16.14.242]
10 157 ms 157 ms 157 ms Xe5-1-2-0-grtmiana2.red.telefonica-wholesale.net
[94.142.127.50]
11 126 ms 125 ms 126 ms softlayer-AE-0-0-grtmiana2.red.telefonica-wholes
ale.net [213.140.51.190]
12 130 ms 126 ms 126 ms ae7.bbr01.tm01.mia01.networklayer.com [173.192.1
8.174]
13 151 ms 151 ms 151 ms ae3.bbr01.sr02.hou02.networklayer.com [173.192.1
8.162]
14 178 ms 155 ms 156 ms ae3.bbr01.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com [173.192.1
8.218]
15 155 ms 155 ms 156 ms ae0.dar01.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com [173.192.1
8.211]
16 159 ms 156 ms 156 ms po1.fcr05.sr06.dal01.networklayer.com [66.228.11
8.221]
17 155 ms 156 ms 157 ms 235.23.193.173.hypernia.com [173.193.23.235]
Rastreamento conclu+¡do.
C:\Users\Alexandre>ping 173.193.23.235
Disparando 173.193.23.235 com 32 bytes de dados:
Resposta de 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 tempo=156ms TTL=115
Resposta de 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 tempo=156ms TTL=115
Resposta de 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 tempo=156ms TTL=115
Resposta de 173.193.23.235: bytes=32 tempo=169ms TTL=115
Estat+¡sticas do Ping para 173.193.23.235:
Pacotes: Enviados = 4, Recebidos = 4, Perdidos = 0 (0% de
perda),
Aproximar um n+¦mero redondo de vezes em milissegundos:
M+¡nimo = 156ms, M+íximo = 169ms, M+¬dia = 159ms
C:\Users\Alexandre>tracert 159.253.143.196
Rastreando a rota para 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196]
com no m+íximo 30 saltos:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms Broadcom.Home [192.168.1.1]
2 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms Broadcom.Home [192.168.1.1]
3 11 ms 7 ms 7 ms 177.133.128.1.dynamic.adsl.gvt.net.br [177.133.1
28.1]
4 8 ms 7 ms 9 ms 186.215.223.226.static.host.gvt.net.br [186.215.
223.226]
5 16 ms 11 ms 11 ms gvt-te-7-1-rc02.rjo.gvt.net.br [189.59.244.177]
6 11 ms 11 ms 11 ms 187.115.216.166.static.host.gvt.net.br [187.115.
216.166]
7 8 ms 8 ms 7 ms Te8-3.asr1.GIG1.gblx.net [64.214.147.61]
8 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms ae0-scr1.GIG1.gblx.net [67.16.136.1]
9 132 ms 132 ms 132 ms xe5-1-0-10G.scr3.NYC1.gblx.net [67.16.167.58]
10 132 ms 143 ms 136 ms lag1.ar9.NYC1.gblx.net [67.16.142.50]
11 132 ms 132 ms 133 ms aol-1.ar2.DCA3.gblx.net [64.208.27.74]
12 133 ms 148 ms 156 ms nyk-bb2-link.telia.net [213.155.130.242]
13 192 ms 207 ms 191 ms ldn-bb2-link.telia.net [213.155.135.66]
14 192 ms 195 ms 191 ms ldn-b3-link.telia.net [80.91.249.176]
15 247 ms 190 ms 191 ms xe-1-0-1.bbr01.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com [213.
248.97.226]
16 192 ms 207 ms 192 ms ae7.bbr02.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com [50.97.18.
207]
17 198 ms 198 ms 198 ms ae0.bbr02.eq01.ams02.networklayer.com [50.97.18.
211]
18 200 ms 199 ms 199 ms ae6.dar01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [50.97.18.
249]
19 206 ms 212 ms 207 ms po1.fcr01.sr01.ams01.networklayer.com [159.253.1
58.131]
20 203 ms 210 ms 204 ms 196.143.253.159.hypernia.com [159.253.143.196]
Rastreamento conclu+¡do.
C:\Users\Alexandre>ping 159.253.143.196
Disparando 159.253.143.196 com 32 bytes de dados:
Resposta de 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 tempo=203ms TTL=115
Resposta de 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 tempo=202ms TTL=115
Resposta de 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 tempo=202ms TTL=115
Resposta de 159.253.143.196: bytes=32 tempo=204ms TTL=115
Estat+¡sticas do Ping para 159.253.143.196:
Pacotes: Enviados = 4, Recebidos = 4, Perdidos = 0 (0% de
perda),
Aproximar um n+¦mero redondo de vezes em milissegundos:
M+¡nimo = 202ms, M+íximo = 204ms, M+¬dia = 202ms
C:\Users\Alexandre> |
[Veteran_BAM HUSQVARNA]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.03 02:55:00 -
[55] - Quote
From Newcastle, Australia:
US: 274
EU: 392
Ping statistics for 173.193.23.235:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Minimum = 274ms, Maximum = 295ms, Average = 287ms
Ping statistics for 159.253.143.196:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Minimum = 392ms, Maximum = 401ms, Average = 397ms |
[Veteran_Kris HighShot]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.03 13:56:00 -
[56] - Quote
Hi
--- 3 juin 2012 16:00:19
PING 159.253.143.196 (159.253.143.196) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 159.253.143.196: icmp_seq=1 ttl=112 time=56.5 ms
64 bytes from 159.253.143.196: icmp_seq=2 ttl=112 time=54.0 ms
64 bytes from 159.253.143.196: icmp_seq=3 ttl=112 time=53.5 ms
--- 159.253.143.196 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2012ms
min = 53.552 ms
avg = 54.731 ms
max = 56.565 ms
mdev = 1.341 ms
Is that good ?
By the way, any ports tcp, udp to open ?
Bye |
[Veteran_Hellaciouss Deeds]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.04 04:57:00 -
[57] - Quote
US = 55ms ave
EU = 118ms ave
Michigan |
[Veteran_Trinciatore92]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 14:31:00 -
[58] - Quote
near ROME (IT)
EU ~ 46 ms
US ~ 147 ms
package send 4
recive 4
lost 0% |
[Veteran_lDocHollidayl]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 18:15:00 -
[59] - Quote
Michigan...avg. 86ms to US...not planning on playing EU. |
[Veteran_Jubal Azizora]
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 01:39:00 -
[60] - Quote
Jambo wrote:US: ~240ms
EU: ~305ms
From Brisbane.
I still kill some fools. ;-)
Reminds me of my PSTN modem days.
The most fun I've ever had playing an FPS was Counter-Strike on an HPB server. I stayed on it (with simulated latency) even after I got cable. :)
edit:
ping wrote:--- 159.253.143.196 ping statistics ---
100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 99094ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.789/27.852/43.365/4.266 ms
ping wrote:--- 173.193.23.235 ping statistics ---
100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 99139ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 136.169/140.890/190.593/6.015 ms
I'm in southern England. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |