|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
16458
   |
Posted - 2015.01.07 22:50:00 -
[1] - Quote
Cody Sietz wrote:I agree with most of these changes.
The only exception I say is allow small missiles and blasters to perform extremely well be infantry and the small rail should have zero blast radius and a extremely small projectile.
Large blasters should stay about the same, but with a reduction to accuracy to accommodate for the lower DMG from AV.
Large rails should be absolutely useless vs infantry.
Large missiles should remain the same, maybe with a slightly small blast radius.
Ewwwwww just ewwww
Yeah we should let missiles retain between 3361 and 4550 DPS as a totally inappropriate tank turret.............
*"He spoke, and we made it so all worlds were one, all peoples were one, all faiths, creeds, and nationalities were one.
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
16464
|
Posted - 2015.01.08 19:37:00 -
[2] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:
I look out for vehicles and pilots. Why should I care about infantry? I prefer to be a pilot, I want it to be my only roll, but it's just not really worth it to have level 5 in everything right now.
Again, why should I care about infantry?
You need to in order to be able to balance Tanks.
*"He spoke, and we made it so all worlds were one, all peoples were one, all faiths, creeds, and nationalities were one.
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
16474
|
Posted - 2015.01.09 05:36:00 -
[3] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:True Adamance wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
I look out for vehicles and pilots. Why should I care about infantry? I prefer to be a pilot, I want it to be my only roll, but it's just not really worth it to have level 5 in everything right now.
Again, why should I care about infantry?
You need to in order to be able to balance Tanks. What he said, myself and others succeeded in making 1.7 happen because we actually spoke with infantry and attempted to find middle ground. We never advocated for tanks to be supreme, just respected and feared again. You spkr never added anything.
EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW I don't ever want to be associated with 1.7 ever.
*"He spoke, and we made it so all worlds were one, all peoples were one, all faiths, creeds, and nationalities were one.
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
16479
|
Posted - 2015.01.09 06:32:00 -
[4] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:True Adamance wrote:Void Echo wrote:True Adamance wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
I look out for vehicles and pilots. Why should I care about infantry? I prefer to be a pilot, I want it to be my only roll, but it's just not really worth it to have level 5 in everything right now.
Again, why should I care about infantry?
You need to in order to be able to balance Tanks. What he said, myself and others succeeded in making 1.7 happen because we actually spoke with infantry and attempted to find middle ground. We never advocated for tanks to be supreme, just respected and feared again. You spkr never added anything. EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW I don't ever want to be associated with 1.7 ever. lol, 1.7 was an overshot, we basically got what we wanted on steroids, let me make this clear, we never wanted 1.7 to be like it was, we even advocated for things to be toned down.
1,7 was the worst thing that happened to tanks in this game. They became skilless death factories that barely resembled a tank and ****** with balance throughout the entire game.
*"He spoke, and we made it so all worlds were one, all peoples were one, all faiths, creeds, and nationalities were one.
|
|
|
| |
|