|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Pocket Rocket Girl
Psygod9
220
   |
Posted - 2015.01.08 03:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Spkr4theDead, you totally and completely missed my point. My point is that Vehicles currently posses a high threat, but are in turn countered by a high threat. The result is that either vehicles are ridiculously powerful or ridiculously terrible. Everything should be more moderate. High threat? What high threat? What on earth are you talking about? You're not a pilot, you have no idea how difficult it is to use a vehicle. Stop trying to act knowledgeable about something you have no clue about.
For some one that cant even answer a girls response on a different thread i really think you are not a tanker and have no idea what you are talking about. regardless of what ever excuse you come up with you really need to get better, or play a different game
Sir Dukey-
If one person is smart he should be able to keep vehicle at bay but not destroy it unless its a stupid driver
|
Pocket Rocket Girl
Psygod9
224
|
Posted - 2015.01.08 05:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Pocket Rocket Girl wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Spkr4theDead, you totally and completely missed my point. My point is that Vehicles currently posses a high threat, but are in turn countered by a high threat. The result is that either vehicles are ridiculously powerful or ridiculously terrible. Everything should be more moderate. High threat? What high threat? What on earth are you talking about? You're not a pilot, you have no idea how difficult it is to use a vehicle. Stop trying to act knowledgeable about something you have no clue about. For some one that cant even answer a girls response on a different thread i really think you are not a tanker and have no idea what you are talking about. regardless of what ever excuse you come up with you really need to get better, or play a different game Buy the Reading Comprehension skillbook and train it straight to level 5.
LOL yeah like i said nice excuse go play world of tanks sorry your 1.7 trip maddy isnt holding your hand any more go QQ some more
Sir Dukey-
If one person is smart he should be able to keep vehicle at bay but not destroy it unless its a stupid driver
|
Pocket Rocket Girl
Psygod9
224
|
Posted - 2015.01.08 06:09:00 -
[3] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:If you don't accept that as an answer, then you're proving my point. Anything we say to you when you ask a question is not an acceptable answer. The only answer you'll take is what you've already formed in your mind.
oh you mean just like i asked you what do you want from vehicles? but yet i need comprehensionn? LOL please stop side stepping.
Buy the Reading Comprehension skillbook and train it straight to level 5. how is that an answer to what i said? its adorable. if you cant even answer a simple question from the other thread which was and i quote
"So tell me Spkr. what is it that you want for tanks? you want the hull upgrades back? the shield reppers? Surya(sp?), Enforcer? all of the old modules back? shorter lock time for shield reppers or armor reppers for tanks?(assuming they bring back the old modules) active or passive armor reps. what do you think should be the shield and armor resistance be should it apply to only the tanks or should it stack on top of shield/armor hardeners? I would like to know what you think what will make tanks on par."
then i believe you have no right to say a single thing on tanks regardless of how long you have been playing or how many SP or isk come up with a idea instead of saying tanks are UP and AV OP.
now every one else watch as the pathetic spkr side steps and goes on to either insult or some other excuse. you give tankers a bad name and i feel bad for them
Sir Dukey-
If one person is smart he should be able to keep vehicle at bay but not destroy it unless its a stupid driver
|
|
|
| |
|