Sorry, was referring specifically to range Nerf.

But seriously, I don't get the combat sniper argument, where people want snipers near the battle... Its just stupidly difficult trying to compete with Rail Rifles, Scramblers, and even Combat rifles. Sure, they can't hit you at your range, but everyone sees a sniper outside the redline and says "Mmmmm, tasty kill!"

Sway after moving totally kills combat sniping, and you HAVE to crouch to have a good chance at hitting something. Its a stupid argument, the combat sniper one... Anyone and their mother can easily counter a combat sniper.

Trust me, I know these facts.

Your reply had nothing to do with what I said... Did you even read it?

If they can shoot someone then they too can be shot. This "redline = no risk" bullshit is just that, bullshit. Redline snipers have always been just little more than annoying gnats but now they're even more annoying because the fcking range nerf means they know where to look for counter-snipers while also making it harder to counter-snipe them because the range nerf also means you can't get at the proper angle to snipe the ones that are behind the sh!tty hitboxes of buildings & terrain.

I'm getting a little tired of this "no risk" argument everyone brings up when they're trying to get something nerfed. It was ridiculous beforehand but now it's just straight up bullshit with BPO's floating around again. With how often "no risk" gets flung around you'd think the forums would be up in arms pissing and moaning about "no risk" being institutionalized but nope, seems nobody really gives a damn about the risk.