|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Thumb Green
Raymond James Corp
1976
   |
Posted - 2014.12.27 22:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
Max range is 450m, so BS on 500+m death from one.
[RYJC]
|
Thumb Green
Raymond James Corp
1979
|
Posted - 2014.12.28 04:29:00 -
[2] - Quote
Timtron Victory wrote:
I consider sniper rifles to be the opposite of shotguns, it makes sense but sniping from the redline is just ridiculous, there is no risk. Most times if they arent too far in, I die after killing them
If they can shoot someone then they too can be shot. This "redline = no risk" bullshit is just that, bullshit. Redline snipers have always been just little more than annoying gnats but now they're even more annoying because the fcking range nerf means they know where to look for counter-snipers while also making it harder to counter-snipe them because the range nerf also means you can't get at the proper angle to snipe the ones that are behind the sh!tty hitboxes of buildings & terrain.
I'm getting a little tired of this "no risk" argument everyone brings up when they're trying to get something nerfed. It was ridiculous beforehand but now it's just straight up bullshit with BPO's floating around again. With how often "no risk" gets flung around you'd think the forums would be up in arms pissing and moaning about "no risk" being institutionalized but nope, seems nobody really gives a damn about the risk.
[RYJC]
|
Thumb Green
Raymond James Corp
1980
|
Posted - 2014.12.28 04:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
Timtron Victory wrote:
I dont really understand what you are trying to say, I am not interested in a nerf. Never called for it.
Of course you didn't specifically call for a nerf but it's the only logical conclusion one can come to from reading that you think the SR's range is too much.
Timtron Victory wrote:Sniping 400m from inside the redline is no risk
You and I must have very different definitions of "no risk".
[RYJC]
|
Thumb Green
Raymond James Corp
1980
|
Posted - 2014.12.28 05:01:00 -
[4] - Quote
Oh you want there to be no redline, okay I get it now. Well just so you know, removing the redline is just as asinine as your definition of "no risk" whatever it may be. To remove the redline would only tighten the noose that is already slowly choking the life out of this game.
[RYJC]
|
Thumb Green
Raymond James Corp
1980
|
Posted - 2014.12.28 05:44:00 -
[5] - Quote
It hasn't gotten that bad, it's been that bad. But that's what happens when you've got a game with virtually no match making.
No weapon use in the redline has the same effect as no redline at all. Might as well just leave the match once your team is redlined because anything else would be a waste of time. I'll admit, it would work out if we could match players based on their performance and most importantly if everyone in a match actually wanted to win; but that's not going to happen because a lot people actually don't care about winning.
[RYJC]
|
|
|
| |
|