DUST Search - ScR is still imbalanced.

All Channels

General Discussions

ScR is still imbalanced.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1502	Posted - 2014.12.23 08:58:00 - [1] - Quote We should cut the magazine of the Scrambler Rifle to 22. That would be much more balanced. More in line with the TacAR. Someone's gotta tell the stupids that their ideas are bad, and I guess it's my job...
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1502	Posted - 2014.12.23 09:12:00 - [2] - Quote Tesfa Alem wrote: How about leave it alone? Can only fire ten rounds before it blows up in your face, how much more of an advantage does an enemy need in CQC? Also, lazer rifle doesnt lose any damage, its just more unwieldly at close range. No, it needs to just be 22 rounds. That would make it just as good as the TacAR. Someone's gotta tell the stupids that their ideas are bad, and I guess it's my job...
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1502	Posted - 2014.12.23 09:16:00 - [3] - Quote Nocturnal Soul wrote: Nope Why not? Do you think the ScR is balanced right now? Because I don't. I think it should have a magazine size of 22 so its more like the TacAR. Someone's gotta tell the stupids that their ideas are bad, and I guess it's my job...
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1502	Posted - 2014.12.23 09:19:00 - [4] - Quote Tesfa Alem wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: Tesfa Alem wrote: How about leave it alone? Can only fire ten rounds before it blows up in your face, how much more of an advantage does an enemy need in CQC? Also, lazer rifle doesnt lose any damage, its just more unwieldly at close range. No, it needs to just be 22 rounds. That would make it just as good as the TacAR. Who G.A.F about the Tac AR? They don't behave even remotely similar. They behavely very similarly. And it would be wise to balance them with one another. I feel like 22 round mags would only make the Scrambler just as powerful as the TacAR. Its perfect. Someone's gotta tell the stupids that their ideas are bad, and I guess it's my job...
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1502	Posted - 2014.12.23 09:27:00 - [5] - Quote sir RAVEN WING wrote: No, do like the LR. Lose X% of damage when engaging within Xm. It is supposed to be a long range weapon, not a 'Short, Medium and Long' range weapon. IIRC, you use Rail Rifles. You really don't have any right to complain when any of the other Rifles beat you in close quarters. Even the ScR. Someone's gotta tell the stupids that their ideas are bad, and I guess it's my job...
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1502	Posted - 2014.12.23 09:30:00 - [6] - Quote Killface Hunt wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: We should cut the magazine of the Scrambler Rifle to 22. That would be much more balanced. More in line with the TacAR. Yeah, let's give the tAR heat build up too if balance it what you want. I do want balance. Which is why I'm only trying to make the ScR just as powerful as the TAC is by making its magazine size 22. Someone's gotta tell the stupids that their ideas are bad, and I guess it's my job...
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1502	Posted - 2014.12.23 09:38:00 - [7] - Quote KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: NO! Are you trolling? Despite my previous posts, I am dead serious. I've just had a revelation. Someone's gotta tell the stupids that their ideas are bad, and I guess it's my job...
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1503	Posted - 2014.12.23 10:04:00 - [8] - Quote KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: NO! Are you trolling? Despite my previous posts, I am dead serious. I've just had a revelation. You should explain the supposed issue with facts and analysis. You didn't reply to the negation of overheat part of my post, but perhaps that is your intention Alright. You've backed me into a corner. First of all, I'll start by saying I don't think the ScR should be reduced to a 22 round magazine, since I know it would be grossly overpowered to be able to fire 22 rounds without overheating. But that wasn't the purpose of this. The purpose of this was to prove, with logic, that the TacAR is OP. More specifically, that it is better than the ScR. Everybody that took part in this thread and agreed or disgreed with me has admitted it. You all think the TacAR is OP. Either you think a 22 round ScR would be OP, balanced, or underpowered. GÇóIf you though it would have been OP to fire 22 rounds from an ScR without overheating surely you must agree that 24 is even more OP than that. You would also be right. GÇóIf you think that 22 would be balanced, surely you must think that adding 2 more would make it OP. Therefore you admit the TacAR is OP. GÇóIf you think 22 would be underpowered, then you obviously don't have any idea about these weapons or how they are balanced, and you should there for not be listened to. A 22 round ScR would be stupidly OP, but still not as powerful as the current Tac. Someone's gotta tell the stupids that their ideas are bad, and I guess it's my job...
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1503	Posted - 2014.12.23 10:25:00 - [9] - Quote Jack McReady wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: The purpose of this was to prove, with logic, that the TacAR is OP. well, the difference between the ScR and Tac is: if you fire ScR very fast it kicks very noticeable and you will have to readjust your aim slightly and still hit at any distance. if you fire TacAr very fast it kicks like a mule and no aim adjustment will ever help you unless you sit right in the face of your target. Honestly, after using both EXTENSIVELY for the last few days, and just testing them a bit. ScR: More recoil. Much more predictable recoil. TAC: A bit Less recoil. Recoil patterns are more random. Someone's gotta tell the stupids that their ideas are bad, and I guess it's my job...
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1504	Posted - 2014.12.23 10:58:00 - [10] - Quote ^lol Someone's gotta tell the stupids that their ideas are bad, and I guess it's my job...

Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1504	Posted - 2014.12.23 11:08:00 - [11] - Quote CommanderBolt wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: ^lol Well I mean when you have people saying the laser rifle doesn't have reduced damage at close range, one does have to wonder if that person has actually ever even used a laser rifle. Ah, you were referring to that part. Then yeah. Raven is one of the people from my sig. Someone's gotta tell the stupids that their ideas are bad, and I guess it's my job...
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1504	Posted - 2014.12.23 11:09:00 - [12] - Quote Alena Ventrallis wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: Tesfa Alem wrote: How about leave it alone? Can only fire ten rounds before it blows up in your face, how much more of an advantage does an enemy need in CQC? Also, lazer rifle doesnt lose any damage, its just more unwieldly at close range. No, it needs to just be 22 rounds. That would make it just as good as the TacAR. Add heat to all other rifles and you have a deal. My point exactly. Someone's gotta tell the stupids that their ideas are bad, and I guess it's my job...
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1504	Posted - 2014.12.23 12:31:00 - [13] - Quote DarK KNigHT007 wrote: Its unwanted nerf that u r calling for.i dont know much but i think a lvl 5 amr assault can fire 20 shots and overheat it after it,so if u reduce the clip__ then soon after u over heat, u need to reload which is ridiculous so i am against this .The Scrambler Rifle has now only lost 15 shots per clip and u want it to be reduced further ..............i think u r a non scr guy who hates it. Oh gosh golly darn it. You got me! I've never used the ScR, much less the Amarr Assault... The only thing I've ever used in this game is my Caldari Scout and Shotgun. I'm just so sick of dying so fast to it! Its not fair that someone can kill me so fast! Someone's gotta tell the stupids that their ideas are bad, and I guess it's my job...
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1505	Posted - 2014.12.23 13:35:00 - [14] - Quote Nocturnal Soul wrote: With 1.10 the Tar has a 24 round clip, that's just as many shots a lvl 5 Amarr assault can pull off before overheating. The Amarr Assault can actually only get 23 consecutive shots before overheating. Someone's gotta tell the stupids that their ideas are bad, and I guess it's my job...
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1505	Posted - 2014.12.23 14:07:00 - [15] - Quote Cavani1EE7 wrote: It's just QQ hidden behind a horrid troll thread. Nothing to see here. I seem to have elicited some pretty heated responses, and some people still don't realize its a troll thread. So I'd hardly say its horrid. I'd give myself at least a 7/10. Unless you just think its horrid because it goes against your delusional views... Which considering its you, its quite possible. Someone's gotta tell the stupids that their ideas are bad, and I guess it's my job...
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1513	Posted - 2014.12.24 18:59:00 - [16] - Quote Her Chosen wrote: I think right now the TacAR, TacCR, and TacSCR are well balanced with one another. Rock paper scissors. I ******* hate stupid people. The "TacCR"? Come one! That isn't even a real weapon! Someone's gotta tell the stupids that their ideas are bad, and I guess it's my job... Armor has always been bad.
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1515	Posted - 2014.12.24 21:16:00 - [17] - Quote Sequal's Back wrote: Your troll has gone too far Fizzer. XD IKR. I clarified on the first page that this was a troll thread. But yet there are still people showing up that think I was serious. Someone's gotta tell the stupids that their ideas are bad, and I guess it's my job... Armor has always been bad.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.