DUST Search - To Rattati: Bandwidth numbers make no sense.

Alaika Arbosa wrote:

Sequal Rise wrote:

Alaika Arbosa wrote:

Z3dog wrote:

Alaika Arbosa wrote:

already been over this, the numbers are backwards.

Still doesn't make sense if you ask me, all Logis should have the same amount of bandwidth.

all logis should have the same bandwidth at standard, advanced, and prototype

I agree, the only arguement I could see working from the contrary is:

Amarr logi should have less because ::sidearm::

However, this isn't me saying that they should, simply that that is the only reason I could see for there being any difference between suits as far as bandwidth is concerned.

Amarr logis role is to put uplinks so having less BW is non sense. The sidearm argument is wrong and is already paid by less H/L slots than any other logis AND only 3 EQ slots at proto..

I'd gladly take out that sidearm slot for a 4th EQ slot and a 5th L slot..

No need to get defensive, remember, I am agreeing with you.

I simply made note of the only reason I could think of for any of them to have less bandwidth.

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Alena Ventrallis Vengeance Unbound 2247	Posted - 2014.12.06 17:16:00 - [1] - Quote Amarr/Caldari logi, whose bonuses rely almost exclusively on deployable equipment, have less bandwidth than Minmatar/Gallente logi whose bonuses are for active equipment. Don't get. Strapped down to my bed, feet cold and eyes red I'm out of my head, am I alive or am I dead
Alaika Arbosa Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. 2297	Posted - 2014.12.06 17:36:00 - [2] - Quote already been over this, the numbers are backwards. Still doesn't make sense if you ask me, all Logis should have the same amount of bandwidth. Dust514/Legion should be a(n): [_] Arcade Lobby Shooter [X] Sci-fi Military Sim
Gyn Wallace OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 158	Posted - 2014.12.06 17:43:00 - [3] - Quote I get giving the Amar logi a little less BW, to balance their sidearm, but I admit that giving the Cal logi less BW than the Min and Gal logis, doesn't make any sense to me either. The Dust/Eve Isk Exchange Thread
Z3dog BIG BAD W0LVES 38	Posted - 2014.12.06 18:03:00 - [4] - Quote Alaika Arbosa wrote: already been over this, the numbers are backwards. Still doesn't make sense if you ask me, all Logis should have the same amount of bandwidth. all logis should have the same bandwidth at standard, advanced, and prototype Dust 5/14
Alaika Arbosa Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. 2297	Posted - 2014.12.06 18:24:00 - [5] - Quote Z3dog wrote: Alaika Arbosa wrote: already been over this, the numbers are backwards. Still doesn't make sense if you ask me, all Logis should have the same amount of bandwidth. all logis should have the same bandwidth at standard, advanced, and prototype I agree, the only arguement I could see working from the contrary is: Amarr logi should have less because ::sidearm:: However, this isn't me saying that they should, simply that that is the only reason I could see for there being any difference between suits as far as bandwidth is concerned. Dust514/Legion should be a(n): [_] Arcade Lobby Shooter [X] Sci-fi Military Sim
Vulpes Dolosus Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 2655	Posted - 2014.12.06 21:39:00 - [6] - Quote Z3dog wrote: Alaika Arbosa wrote: already been over this, the numbers are backwards. Still doesn't make sense if you ask me, all Logis should have the same amount of bandwidth. all logis should have the same bandwidth at standard, advanced, and prototype I'm not sure if you're saying all racial logis should have the same BW at S/A/P or if S/A/P should all have the same BW. Dust is there! I was real! Dear diary, Rattati senpai noticed me today~
Sequal Rise Les Desanusseurs 388	Posted - 2014.12.06 23:56:00 - [7] - Quote Alaika Arbosa wrote: Z3dog wrote: Alaika Arbosa wrote: already been over this, the numbers are backwards. Still doesn't make sense if you ask me, all Logis should have the same amount of bandwidth. all logis should have the same bandwidth at standard, advanced, and prototype I agree, the only arguement I could see working from the contrary is: Amarr logi should have less because ::sidearm:: However, this isn't me saying that they should, simply that that is the only reason I could see for there being any difference between suits as far as bandwidth is concerned. Amarr logis role is to put uplinks so having less BW is non sense. The sidearm argument is wrong and is already paid by less H/L slots than any other logis AND only 3 EQ slots at proto.. I'd gladly take out that sidearm slot for a 4th EQ slot and a 5th L slot..
ACT1ON BASTARD Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 252	Posted - 2014.12.07 00:10:00 - [8] - Quote I'm an amaar logi and I'd rather use the minmatar to throw my links with this new bandwidth retardation.
Alaika Arbosa Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. 2300	Posted - 2014.12.07 04:05:00 - [9] - Quote Sequal Rise wrote: Alaika Arbosa wrote: Z3dog wrote: Alaika Arbosa wrote: already been over this, the numbers are backwards. Still doesn't make sense if you ask me, all Logis should have the same amount of bandwidth. all logis should have the same bandwidth at standard, advanced, and prototype I agree, the only arguement I could see working from the contrary is: Amarr logi should have less because ::sidearm:: However, this isn't me saying that they should, simply that that is the only reason I could see for there being any difference between suits as far as bandwidth is concerned. Amarr logis role is to put uplinks so having less BW is non sense. The sidearm argument is wrong and is already paid by less H/L slots than any other logis AND only 3 EQ slots at proto.. I'd gladly take out that sidearm slot for a 4th EQ slot and a 5th L slot.. No need to get defensive, remember, I am agreeing with you. I simply made note of the only reason I could think of for any of them to have less bandwidth. Dust514/Legion should be a(n): [_] Arcade Lobby Shooter [X] Sci-fi Military Sim
Finn Colman Immortal Guides Learning Alliance 90	Posted - 2014.12.07 04:11:00 - [10] - Quote Why are people still upset about a typo? A shadow clad in duct tape, waiting for the moment to strike. PSA: Tell players to terminate in order to access mCRUs.

Meee One Amakakeru-Ryu-no-Hirameki 1369	Posted - 2014.12.07 14:17:00 - [11] - Quote Finn Colman wrote: Why are people still upset about a typo? Because they refuse to read the Dev response. Skimming =/= R-¦-¬\|)-íng. (reading) -¼_-¼ Official Blueberry of the Forums. Title given by my #1 fan Sgt Kirk.
Sequal Rise Les Desanusseurs 398	Posted - 2014.12.07 21:05:00 - [12] - Quote Alaika Arbosa wrote: Sequal Rise wrote: Alaika Arbosa wrote: Z3dog wrote: Alaika Arbosa wrote: already been over this, the numbers are backwards. Still doesn't make sense if you ask me, all Logis should have the same amount of bandwidth. all logis should have the same bandwidth at standard, advanced, and prototype I agree, the only arguement I could see working from the contrary is: Amarr logi should have less because ::sidearm:: However, this isn't me saying that they should, simply that that is the only reason I could see for there being any difference between suits as far as bandwidth is concerned. Amarr logis role is to put uplinks so having less BW is non sense. The sidearm argument is wrong and is already paid by less H/L slots than any other logis AND only 3 EQ slots at proto.. I'd gladly take out that sidearm slot for a 4th EQ slot and a 5th L slot.. No need to get defensive, remember, I am agreeing with you. I simply made note of the only reason I could think of for any of them to have less bandwidth. I didn't mean to be aggressive sorry ^^ It's just that this sidearm argument is overly used to justify how bad the Amarr Logi is :/ It needs a buff in many ways.. Assault, Logi, Scout, Heavy.. What do you need?
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1313	Posted - 2014.12.07 21:23:00 - [13] - Quote Gyn Wallace wrote: I get giving the Amar logi a little less BW, to balance their sidearm, but I admit that giving the Cal logi less BW than the Min and Gal logis, doesn't make any sense to me either. I figured the lower slot count, equipment count, and low PG count was enough to "balance their sidearm"... But whatever. Please, make my Opus pretty...
Imp Smash Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 459	Posted - 2014.12.08 05:34:00 - [14] - Quote You guys do know that the aforementioned info about who has more/less bandwidth was a mistake right? They have it set as Amarr/Cal getting more BW for their deployables and Min/Gal getting less.


Pages: 1 :: [one page]