|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jathniel
G I A N T
1282
   |
Posted - 2014.11.21 19:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
Things we were supposed to get.
The Frame system for customized weapons.
http://rakshasa.no/downloads/eve/wallpapers/smg_modelsheet1200x2133.jpg
Aircraft, the last two MCCs, medium vehicles, and (the last two on the bottom right.... are "bikes"?)
http://i.imgur.com/4xNAmjj.png
The other melee weapons...
http://i.imgur.com/uoQpwnJ.jpg
The other tanks and cars...
http://newmmorpgames.ru/uploads/posts/2013-06/1370063245_dust-514.png
Then there were these guys...
http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/736x/f2/09/19/f2091904e87ea5246566bf39b48bc686.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Nn8ThFVx-1E/UNpz1SuKVhI/AAAAAAAAAcM/chIi-cPGRxk/s640/dust+514+rogue+drone+2.png
Electronic weapon sight (on AR) (something we actually HAD, that was taken away)
http://www.gamearthub.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/555_max.jpg
But my questions for our Lord and Savior, is if he is aware of just how much was expected of Dust.
And, is it reasonable to see ANY of these things come (come back) to Dust? Or are they going to be only for Legion?
Set your goals high, and shoot for the moon; even if you miss you'll land amongst the stars.
|
Jathniel
G I A N T
1290
|
Posted - 2014.11.22 04:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Perhaps it is not me underestimating the impact, and more you underestimating the required investment.
Additionally, nobody in this thread has come up with gameplay benefits to adding any of these things. "New/shiny!" is basically the strategy of the original development. Putting things into the game without any idea how they should work in relation to everything else. (See HAVs, cloaks, etc.) This was dumb. What this thread seems to be asking for, is more of what got DUST into such a bad place to begin with.
What's with all the hostility?
I've always shown respect to CPM members.
Why are you attributing ill-motive to me and my thread?
Every single one of your posts in this thread so far seems to be coming off of some kind of condescending handle.
My OP was not made in a spirit of entitlement or demand.
It was however, made in ignorance. Hence why I asked questions. Were these originally planned additions, things that we would see in Dust or not?
Perhaps the emboldened and underlined text gave the wrong impression? lol
(EDIT: Apparently, there is some kind underlying tone of negativity on the forums. So special effort must be made for a post to be understood in a benign nature. Post text updated.)
Set your goals high, and shoot for the moon; even if you miss you'll land amongst the stars.
|
Jathniel
G I A N T
1290
|
Posted - 2014.11.22 04:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Jathniel wrote:What's with all the hostility? I'm not hostile. I'm not "attributing ill-motive" to you. Why is telling you the request is a bad idea "hostile"? And with regards to your thread edit, you might notice I was responding to True Adamance, not you. ;) I did intend to answer general questions about the thread, but a lot of my posts in the thread have been in response to other people.
Well, hostility was the impression I got from your responses to other people (I can see how Sinboto may have seemed to be rubbing you the wrong way, but even he warned you that your verbiage was "inviting confrontation".)
Especially...
Soraya Xel wrote:
Shortsighted would be someone who can't get over a presentation from two years ago, and has CCP waste months of effort for minimal to nonexistent gains.
Your responding to his veiled insult, by pretty much insulting everyone that actually cared to see these additions?
Look, I just wanted to ask Rattati a few questions, not start a fire.
Namely, if he knew about these previous concepts and if bringing them to Dust was still in the cards. That's all. I wasn't "requesting" anything else but information. How is that a bad idea?
Look man, I'm just going drop it. I'm sorry dude.
Set your goals high, and shoot for the moon; even if you miss you'll land amongst the stars.
|
|
|
| |
|