|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
MINA Longstrike
Kirjuun Heiian
1670
   |
Posted - 2014.11.20 20:51:00 -
[1] - Quote
Yes, please sweep away legitimate complaints about a weapon being unable to perform by labeling them as "QQ" Fox, that's a mature and adult thing to do instead of addressing complaints simply belittle the people who might make them.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Kirjuun Heiian.
I have a few alts.
|
MINA Longstrike
Kirjuun Heiian
1670
|
Posted - 2014.11.20 20:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
Zatara Rought wrote:The RR was simply 2 good in CQC and the only issue was that IMO CCP Rattati did not wait long enough for the data to pour in...instead he saw crying and made a change from the original CQC kick to this.
I keep asking, but where did he pool feedback before changing the RR charge time!?
Anyone got a thread where he pooled feedback for increasing the charge time??
I ask because it :feels: like he saw QQ threads from people and knee jerked it which is very bad practice...ruining the damn thing instead of balancing it.
Does anyone have any info on the progression of how we got here?
I keep saying this people but for most weapons now we should be bringing in a surgeon's scalpel and not a butchers knife.
But my RR feels butchered with the charge time increase.
Bring back the kick please. Don't break the weapon.
1) No the rail wasn't 'too good' in cqc. A person could defend themselves with it or attack others but that's the *point* of a service rifle.
2) The quadrupled kick ruined the weapon. No weapon should ever feel 'bad' to use, and that's exactly what even the doubled kick did, made it feel bad to use.
I asked rattati for data on where kills were happening with the 'overused' rail rifle because I feel it was a map design problem and a problem with the rail having excessive range. Not a problem with their cqc ability. Rattati never responded.
It very much feels like he looked at the weapon and went "THIS IS BEING USED TOO MUCH" and nerfed it based on only that.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Kirjuun Heiian.
I have a few alts.
|
MINA Longstrike
Kirjuun Heiian
1672
|
Posted - 2014.11.21 02:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:
Misquoting a dev is a bannable offense
No offense rattati, but you've still failed to assuage the concerns of people who like this weapon for whatever reason. I myself asked you for metrics as to where kills were happening with the rail rifle and where deaths were happening with those who used them and to what weapon, because I honestly believe that it's not a case of the weapon overperforming at short range, it's a case of it overperforming at long range.
As it stands right now, any caldari 'loyalist' has a weapon that feels awful to use. Many of us don't feel like we're capable of playing the objective and our sidearms aren't exactly well suited to close quarters either.
It's incredibly frustrating to feel like weapons are getting nerfed because they're too popular, and that certain races 'shouldn't be allowed' to do things.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Kirjuun Heiian.
I have a few alts.
|
MINA Longstrike
Kirjuun Heiian
1674
|
Posted - 2014.11.21 10:28:00 -
[4] - Quote
shaman oga wrote:Funny thing is that now is more effective in CQC.
Kick like a mule version lasted a couple of days and was almost perfect, very good at long distance, usable at short but only as a finisher (5-6 shots).
But people like to QQ, i don't know why Rattati has listened them.
No, No it wasn't and No it isn't. A little bit of kick is good for cqc, BOUNCES ALL OVER THE ****ING PLACE like it's being handled by someone with parkinsons who's experiencing an epileptic seizure is not.
Even in CQC you want your shots to be on target, not 'whoops looks like all my bullets passed 45 degrees from you!". The gun feels like it's being handled by rookies from x-com ufo defense.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Kirjuun Heiian.
I have a few alts.
|
|
|
| |
|