| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
postapo wastelander
Wasteland Desert Rangers
630
   |
Posted - 2014.11.13 01:22:00 -
[31] - Quote
AURs can stay, but what should be more pushed is time spent in games, i think.
Logs in doesnt mater much, because i can log in and out how many times i want.
"Savvy"
|
I-Shayz-I
I----------I
5049
|
Posted - 2014.11.13 02:11:00 -
[32] - Quote
postapo wastelander wrote:AURs can stay, but what should be more pushed is time spent in games, i think.
Logs in doesnt mater much, because i can log in and out how many times i want.
Daily logins are the stackable bonus you get from logging in every day...not just points for simply logging into the game.
35 points per week is silly though.
7162 wp with a Repair Tool!
List of Legion Feedback Threads!
|
postapo wastelander
Wasteland Desert Rangers
630
|
Posted - 2014.11.13 02:19:00 -
[33] - Quote
I-Shayz-I wrote:postapo wastelander wrote:AURs can stay, but what should be more pushed is time spent in games, i think.
Logs in doesnt mater much, because i can log in and out how many times i want. Daily logins are the stackable bonus you get from logging in every day...not just points for simply logging into the game. 35 points per week is silly though.
Oh oki making sence boyo 
Im just confused, because im not good with all that thingies around, maybe some bonus-counter implement for boyos like me 
"Savvy"
|
howard sanchez
1001
|
Posted - 2014.11.13 02:30:00 -
[34] - Quote
So first CCP Rattati and then Zatara ask for player community input on what you would like to see contribute to Loyalty.
What are the recommendations? I missed those
And you can refer to me as Major Sanchez
Show off your Quafe
|
taxi bastard
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
270
|
Posted - 2014.11.13 04:14:00 -
[35] - Quote
to be honest coming from monthly sub games i honestly agree with aurum spent giving greater benefits.
assume player a) has rank 15 and has spent a fortune and player B) has spent nothing and enjoyed the game for free is it so bad for player A) to have a maximum 15% more reward than player B) considering it only people paying that keeps the game alive?
FFS its only a maximum of 15% between level 1 and 15, that is minimal compaired to many games. free to play games need a source of income and in the case of dust the advantages are minimal besides boosters IMO
i am LVL 8 which i am taking is slightly above middle of the road before you ask so shoot me for have 1 or 2% more than you  |
Maken Tosch
DUST University
Ivy League
10230
|
Posted - 2014.11.13 04:21:00 -
[36] - Quote
Ripley Riley wrote:People who pay money are paying for your new content, hotfixes, etc. Why shouldn't they receive a reward for the aurum they have spent?
I've spent somewhere in the neighborhood of $300 on this game and I'm rank 9, btw. I think the highest rank I've met is 12.
It's not the fact they can pay for points that gets me. I'm ok with rewarding paying customers. However, I'm NOT ok with excessively rewarding paying customers. Why do I have to grind through 200 matches (assuming I win each one) when I can get the same results by paying $1? That's unfair for the players who don't want to pay money.
On Twitter: @HilmarVeigar #greenlightlegion #dust514 players are waiting.
|
Maken Tosch
DUST University
Ivy League
10230
|
Posted - 2014.11.13 04:23:00 -
[37] - Quote
postapo wastelander wrote:AURs can stay, but what should be more pushed is time spent in games, i think.
Logs in doesnt mater much, because i can log in and out how many times i want.
Daily logins can't be stacked in a single day. There's a reason why it's called daily login.
On Twitter: @HilmarVeigar #greenlightlegion #dust514 players are waiting.
|
I-Shayz-I
I----------I
5052
|
Posted - 2014.11.13 08:56:00 -
[38] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Ripley Riley wrote:People who pay money are paying for your new content, hotfixes, etc. Why shouldn't they receive a reward for the aurum they have spent?
I've spent somewhere in the neighborhood of $300 on this game and I'm rank 9, btw. I think the highest rank I've met is 12. It's not the fact they can pay for points that gets me. I'm ok with rewarding paying customers. However, I'm NOT ok with excessively rewarding paying customers. Why do I have to grind through 200 matches (assuming I win each one) when I can get the same results by paying $1? That's unfair for the players who don't want to pay money.
The most fair way to do it would be to allow players to earn Loyalty rank at a rate similar to how much one would pay for a monthly subscription to a game.
So maybe anywhere from 5-15k in a month if you play very regularly.
7162 wp with a Repair Tool!
List of Legion Feedback Threads!
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |