|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
14406
   |
Posted - 2014.11.11 02:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:XxGhazbaranxX wrote:People preffer to jump out of your tank to kill the guys that i put in front of the gunners...
Seriously, anything is better than small blasters... I want them to be usefulls so bad as anti infantry. how fix them?
If anything I think they should function more like a large blaster. Slower projectiles that have more mass to them with a less damage. While the Large Blaster should have its projectiles altered to be as plasma cannon rounds.
I know it would be a difficult fix and not really suitable but I know I'd certainly use Small Blasters on my HAV more if they were more reliable in terms of damage per shot.
"HeGÇÖs sorry. ThatGÇÖs his sorry faceGǪ. Just keep quiet for now and maybe you'll get through this."
-Kador Ouryon
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
14406
|
Posted - 2014.11.11 02:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
Apothecary Za'ki wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:XxGhazbaranxX wrote:People preffer to jump out of your tank to kill the guys that i put in front of the gunners...
Seriously, anything is better than small blasters... I want them to be usefulls so bad as anti infantry. how fix them? first problem is the limited movment of the front gun on tanks.. 180 deg isnot good.. also too low to the ground.. make the large turrets have 2 hardpoints for guns instead.
Having two turrets up on the cuppola would be poor HAV design. If anything they could bring it further up the front hull of the HAV instead of having it hang off the front and reduce its horizontal axis to 90-120 degrees.
"HeGÇÖs sorry. ThatGÇÖs his sorry faceGǪ. Just keep quiet for now and maybe you'll get through this."
-Kador Ouryon
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
14408
|
Posted - 2014.11.11 02:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ghost Kaisar wrote:True Adamance wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:XxGhazbaranxX wrote:People preffer to jump out of your tank to kill the guys that i put in front of the gunners...
Seriously, anything is better than small blasters... I want them to be usefulls so bad as anti infantry. how fix them? If anything I think they should function more like a large blaster. Slower projectiles that have more mass to them with a less damage. While the Large Blaster should have its projectiles altered to be as plasma cannon rounds. I know it would be a difficult fix and not really suitable but I know I'd certainly use Small Blasters on my HAV more if they were more reliable in terms of damage per shot. I like this. I like this a lot. Give it like a 12 round clip and fire slow, powerful blasts. Blasters are used on top to keep AV away.
Indeed. I've made it no secret I feel that Large Turrets should have a limited field to being primarily AV turrets (they will need to be if Marauders and Enforcers come out with those extra module slots and 10K plus EHP) but still be able to skill shot infantry despite slow tracking speeds, and limited barrel depression leaving HAV hulls assailable by AV units.
To counter AV units HAV pilots should be incentivised to make use of vehicle gunners and Small Turrets designed to chew up and push off Infantry units.
"HeGÇÖs sorry. ThatGÇÖs his sorry faceGǪ. Just keep quiet for now and maybe you'll get through this."
-Kador Ouryon
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
14409
|
Posted - 2014.11.11 03:48:00 -
[4] - Quote
XxGhazbaranxX wrote:True Adamance wrote:
Indeed. I've made it no secret I feel that Large Turrets should have a limited field to being primarily AV turrets (they will need to be if Marauders and Enforcers come out with those extra module slots and 10K plus EHP) but still be able to skill shot infantry despite slow tracking speeds, and limited barrel depression leaving HAV hulls assailable by AV units.
To counter AV units HAV pilots should be incentivised to make use of vehicle gunners and Small Turrets designed to chew up and push off Infantry units.
Please keep the discussion relevant to small blasters please
It is relevant to small blasters as it related to their role as a small anti infantry suppression turret.
"HeGÇÖs sorry. ThatGÇÖs his sorry faceGǪ. Just keep quiet for now and maybe you'll get through this."
-Kador Ouryon
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
14409
|
Posted - 2014.11.11 03:57:00 -
[5] - Quote
XxGhazbaranxX wrote:True Adamance wrote:XxGhazbaranxX wrote:True Adamance wrote:
Indeed. I've made it no secret I feel that Large Turrets should have a limited field to being primarily AV turrets (they will need to be if Marauders and Enforcers come out with those extra module slots and 10K plus EHP) but still be able to skill shot infantry despite slow tracking speeds, and limited barrel depression leaving HAV hulls assailable by AV units.
To counter AV units HAV pilots should be incentivised to make use of vehicle gunners and Small Turrets designed to chew up and push off Infantry units.
Please keep the discussion relevant to small blasters please It is relevant to small blasters as it related to their role as a small anti infantry suppression turret. My bad. Its the ratio of directed content in which i felt the enfasis was on large turet balance overall based on There being no suggestions or insight on the small turret apart from tankers having to rely on them for anti infantry work. But again, my apologies=
Both are relevant to one another I believe. Still I guess this isn't the place for full turret balance talk, more specifically small blasters.
"HeGÇÖs sorry. ThatGÇÖs his sorry faceGǪ. Just keep quiet for now and maybe you'll get through this."
-Kador Ouryon
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
14415
|
Posted - 2014.11.11 08:13:00 -
[6] - Quote
Sgt Kirk wrote:Rattati I guarantee you most of these people have not used small blasters as much as they say they do.
Hit detection is absolutely the main issue with small blasters, I dont want to sound high and mighty here but I know what I'm actually talking about. After all, this is Gallente Tech.
Not going to lie I've tried to use it..... and found it lacking. I am simply not willing to waste the PG and CPU on them when Rails do significantly better.
"HeGÇÖs sorry. ThatGÇÖs his sorry faceGǪ. Just keep quiet for now and maybe you'll get through this."
-Kador Ouryon
|
|
|
| |
|