|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Doshneil Antaro
Dem Durrty Boyz
General Tso's Alliance
292
   |
Posted - 2014.11.05 02:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:I hear you, but how do you propose we improve the situation.
ONe way would be to shorten the blip timer massively, just so you see them instantly, and no more
Sorry but you made uour bed Rattati. You nerfed the needle, we picked the scanner . If you nerf the scanner , we will run hives and remotes. This cycle will continue till all equipment is useless.
The scans are currently fine, it just other equipment was made less desirable, thus creating a mass influx of the scanners equiped. Look back to the forum "Needle Changes Will Hurt the Game" and look at my posts. I gave reasons why the scanner would be so widely used and the needle wouldn't prior to 1.9
Sage /thread
|
Doshneil Antaro
Dem Durrty Boyz
General Tso's Alliance
292
|
Posted - 2014.11.06 00:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
Vesta Opalus wrote:Doshneil Antaro wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:I hear you, but how do you propose we improve the situation.
ONe way would be to shorten the blip timer massively, just so you see them instantly, and no more Sorry but you made uour bed Rattati. You nerfed the needle, we picked the scanner . If you nerf the scanner , we will run hives and remotes. This cycle will continue till all equipment is useless. The scans are currently fine, it just other equipment was made less desirable, thus creating a mass influx of the scanners equiped. Look back to the forum "Needle Changes Will Hurt the Game" and look at my posts. I gave reasons why the scanner would be so widely used and the needle wouldn't prior to 1.9 But the needle is fine... why is every change the end of all life as we know it for you? Are you a republican or something? its not I've just traded the hardly used needle for the scanner.
btw: DEMS got BTFO!!!!!! Your libtard tears are just that much tastier.
Sage /thread
|
Doshneil Antaro
Dem Durrty Boyz
General Tso's Alliance
292
|
Posted - 2014.11.06 18:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
Myron Kundera wrote:Doshneil Antaro wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:I hear you, but how do you propose we improve the situation.
ONe way would be to shorten the blip timer massively, just so you see them instantly, and no more Sorry but you made uour bed Rattati. You nerfed the needle, we picked the scanner . If you nerf the scanner , we will run hives and remotes. This cycle will continue till all equipment is useless. The scans are currently fine, it just other equipment was made less desirable, thus creating a mass influx of the scanners equiped. Look back to the forum "Needle Changes Will Hurt the Game" and look at my posts. I gave reasons why the scanner would be so widely used and the needle wouldn't prior to 1.9 Lol. With all due respect, needle has nothing to do with this issue. New needle mechanic is AWESOME, so yeah, nice try sneaking the subject here mate.  What Iwas pointing out is due to needle changes, I told CCP that more players would equip the scanner instead. This inturn created more qq about the active scanner because of the influx of its use. This qq is just that when players don't realize that the scouts passives is superior to the narrow angle, short duration, and long cooldowns of the active. I also agree with your statements about the scanner and its issues. When I stated that the active scanner was "fine" I was merely pointing out that it didn't need another nerf. Forgive me for not elaborating in my post.
(side note)- I am not party affiliated, I just vote for what is best for my country. This year it was obvious that it was best that DEMS get BTFO. Next election I would like more balance as now Dems might be less liberal.
Sage /thread
|
Doshneil Antaro
Dem Durrty Boyz
General Tso's Alliance
292
|
Posted - 2014.11.06 19:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
Vesta Opalus wrote:Clone D wrote:Vesta Opalus wrote:Clone D wrote:Are you suggesting that in order to make it fair to everyone, there should be some level of active scanner capable of detecting all scouts, even the most dampened ones? Yes, active and passive scans. However the most dampened scouts would only be scannable at very short ranges. One consideration for active scanners: if these "very short ranges" are too short (i.e. less than 20 meters), then the merc doing the scanning will not have time to swap from his/her scanner to a weapon, since weapon changes cannot occur until the scan completes, rendering the merc running the active scan incapable of self defense. I agree, active scanners should maintain a range advantage over passive scans due to the ephemeral nature of the scans. Also I think active scanners should have their base precision nerfed and then have precision modules increase their precision, that way one piece of equipment cant counter any number of dampeners on its own.
This is a stellar idea that would benefit the game tremendously.
Sage /thread
|
Doshneil Antaro
Dem Durrty Boyz
General Tso's Alliance
292
|
Posted - 2014.11.07 01:57:00 -
[5] - Quote
Cross Atu wrote:/swaps "active" to "passive" in thread title, exits thread
Normally by default I hate cpms, but this makes so much sense that I love you atm.
Sage /thread
|
|
|
| |
|