DUST Search - WTF CCP SERIOUSLY?!?!?

WARxion ForDUST wrote:

Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote:

I've been playing this game for the past 2 years. I've spent over $600 (SIX HUNDRED) buying packs and aurum on this game. I've accrued over 2.3 million lifetime WP, and you only award me a rank 9, NINE! This is quite frankly an absurd ratio, the amount of aurumn I have purchased and aurumn spent on this game should have warranted me at least a rank 13 if not the full 15.

You seriously need to go back and revise the XP value of aurum purchased and aurum spent. I am seriously disappointed and quite frankly offended that you consider the financial support that I have provided this game to be of so little value in terms of loyalty to the game.

You need to seriously revise the value you place on aurum purchased and aurum spent by a player, and I expect to see that loyalty ranking of mine increase exponentially the next time I log into this game.

I wad seriously considering purchasing AT LEAST another $200 worth of aurum, but seeing as you consider the financial support of your game to be of so little value to you, I think I'll take my money and support another project instead on the likes of KICKSTARTER.COM

You spent $600 on AUR in hope that on a nice sunny day CCP will implement a Rank system so you will be Rank 13 on patch day out of 15. It's not the unimplemented features like player market, EVE connection, PVE and the poorly optimised, clunky gameplay (now fixed maybe) that makes you angry, but this. Wow

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Yelhsa Jin-Mao Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation 354	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:24:00 - [1] - Quote I've been playing this game for the past 2 years. I've spent over $600 (SIX HUNDRED) buying packs and aurum on this game. I've accrued over 2.3 million lifetime WP, and you only award me a rank 9, NINE! This is quite frankly an absurd ratio, the amount of aurumn I have purchased and aurumn spent on this game should have warranted me at least a rank 13 if not the full 15. You seriously need to go back and revise the XP value of aurum purchased and aurum spent. I am seriously disappointed and quite frankly offended that you consider the financial support that I have provided this game to be of so little value in terms of loyalty to the game. You need to seriously revise the value you place on aurum purchased and aurum spent by a player, and I expect to see that loyalty ranking of mine increase exponentially the next time I log into this game. I wad seriously considering purchasing AT LEAST another $200 worth of aurum, but seeing as you consider the financial support of your game to be of so little value to you, I think I'll take my money and support another project instead on the likes of KICKSTARTER.COM And no, you CANT have my ISK!!!
Breakin Stuff Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group 4475	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:26:00 - [2] - Quote Oh FFS quit acting like a buttmad entitled... Of all the things to get mad about... REALLY? EVE Online is what you get when engineers attempt to create "fun" without consulting someone who comprehends the word.
Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 3389	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:27:00 - [3] - Quote "Whaaahhh!!! I was to pay to get better bonuses but CCP is putting more value on people playing rather than spending money!" Hotfix Delta Sentinel eHP Calcs
waistr DEAD-MEN-WALKING 229	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:28:00 - [4] - Quote someone is a little full of himself
WARxion ForDUST G0DS AM0NG MEN General Tso's Alliance 80	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:29:00 - [5] - Quote Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: I've been playing this game for the past 2 years. I've spent over $600 (SIX HUNDRED) buying packs and aurum on this game. I've accrued over 2.3 million lifetime WP, and you only award me a rank 9, NINE! This is quite frankly an absurd ratio, the amount of aurumn I have purchased and aurumn spent on this game should have warranted me at least a rank 13 if not the full 15. You seriously need to go back and revise the XP value of aurum purchased and aurum spent. I am seriously disappointed and quite frankly offended that you consider the financial support that I have provided this game to be of so little value in terms of loyalty to the game. You need to seriously revise the value you place on aurum purchased and aurum spent by a player, and I expect to see that loyalty ranking of mine increase exponentially the next time I log into this game. I wad seriously considering purchasing AT LEAST another $200 worth of aurum, but seeing as you consider the financial support of your game to be of so little value to you, I think I'll take my money and support another project instead on the likes of KICKSTARTER.COM You spent $600 on AUR in hope that on a nice sunny day CCP will implement a Rank system so you will be Rank 13 on patch day out of 15. It's not the unimplemented features like player market, EVE connection, PVE and the poorly optimised, clunky gameplay (now fixed maybe) that makes you angry, but this. Wow Yes, I'm that desperate...
Foley Jones Huogikku Corporation Heiian Conglomerate 701	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:30:00 - [6] - Quote OP Stop sucking the **** EVE online trial
Byozuma Kegawa Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 315	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:30:00 - [7] - Quote Oh boo hoo, you spent money on a game over the course of a couple years, you deserve to get all the accolades. Notice me, CCP-sempai! I don't feel you. So you supported the game, that investment has already been spent on such great things as dropsuits, weapons, maps, bug fixes, rebalancing, features, a potential future sequel on the PC. All things you've enjoyed, or may enjoy in the future. Losing out on loyalty rank, which I highly doubt is entirely based on spending habits, seems a pretty petty concern. You want more loyalty rank, run more Faction matches. Quit whining about how you can't buy love.
Atiim Heaven's Lost Property 13422	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:30:00 - [8] - Quote I don't know about you, but personally I wouldn't find this Loyalty Ranks mechanic fun if I already had Rank 15 on it's first day. The 1st Matari Commando -HAND
Soraya Xel Abandoned Privilege Top Men. 4601	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:31:00 - [9] - Quote I haven't yet heard of anyone over rank 10. My personal guess is that they scaled the system so even veterans would have some work to hit the maximum. Plus, if you saw Dennie's post about how much he spent on the game, you'd know you aren't the top of the chart. ;) CPM1 Elect. Thanks for all your support. [email protected] for ideas, thoughts, and feedback.
Breakin Stuff Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group 4476	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:32:00 - [10] - Quote Atiim wrote: I don't know about you, but personally I wouldn't find this Loyalty Ranks mechanic fun if I already had Rank 15 on it's first day. I would! But I have no shame, nor do I care about fair play. Plus I'm betting Rattati put me at rank -15. EVE Online is what you get when engineers attempt to create "fun" without consulting someone who comprehends the word.

Yelhsa Jin-Mao Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation 354	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:33:00 - [11] - Quote Pokey Dravon wrote: "Whaaahhh!!! I was to pay to get better bonuses but CCP is putting more value on people playing rather than spending money!" People playing the game does not support it you numbskull. If it wasn't for the likes of me and other players digging deep to make this game financially viable for CCP, you freeloaders wouldn't even have a game to play, let alone a forum to post on. Perhaps you should be a little bit more appreciative towards those who actually support the game that spend so much of your time on. I've been playing for over 2 years, and I still consider my financial investment to be of more value to me than my time investment into this game. Had this been any other project on KICKSTARTER.COM, I'd have spent so much investing into it that the developers would have awarded me my name in the credits, my own planet/weapon/dropsuit named after me, or at the very least, a tangible collectors item that I can own. And no, you CANT have my ISK!!!
Yelhsa Jin-Mao Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation 354	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:37:00 - [12] - Quote Soraya Xel wrote: I haven't yet heard of anyone over rank 10. My personal guess is that they scaled the system so even veterans would have some work to hit the maximum. Plus, if you saw Dennie's post about how much he spent on the game, you'd know you aren't the top of the chart. ;) And I sympathise deeply with them and feel even more strongly that they should be awarded a higher ranking, and I seriously think that CCP should re-evaluate the loyalty ranking system and the XP value in relation to Aurumn purchased and spent. And no, you CANT have my ISK!!!
WARxion ForDUST G0DS AM0NG MEN General Tso's Alliance 80	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:37:00 - [13] - Quote Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: "Whaaahhh!!! I was to pay to get better bonuses but CCP is putting more value on people playing rather than spending money!" People playing the game does not support it you numbskull. If it wasn't for the likes of me and other players digging deep to make this game financially viable for CCP, you freeloaders wouldn't even have a game to play, let alone a forum to post on. Perhaps you should be a little bit more appreciative towards those who actually support the game that spend so much of your time on. I've been playing for over 2 years, and I still consider my financial investment to be of more value to me than my time investment into this game. Had this been any other project on KICKSTARTER.COM, I'd have spent so much investing into it that the developers would have awarded me my name in the credits, my own planet/weapon/dropsuit named after me, or at the very least, a tangible collectors item that I can own. Is that a "subtle" KICKSTARTER.COM commercial like this one? Yes, I'm that desperate...
Lazer Fo Cused Shining Flame Amarr Empire 69	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:38:00 - [14] - Quote 1. Paying to buy a rank is bad form 1a. Your rank - Entitled Special Snowflake
Breakin Stuff Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group 4476	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:39:00 - [15] - Quote Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: Soraya Xel wrote: I haven't yet heard of anyone over rank 10. My personal guess is that they scaled the system so even veterans would have some work to hit the maximum. Plus, if you saw Dennie's post about how much he spent on the game, you'd know you aren't the top of the chart. ;) And I sympathise deeply with them and feel even more strongly that they should be awarded a higher ranking, and I seriously think that CCP should re-evaluate the loyalty ranking system and the XP value in relation to Aurumn purchased and spent. Yes because pay to win isn't enough of a paranoid concern you have the audacity to get mad that it's not pay to win. Amazing. EVE Online is what you get when engineers attempt to create "fun" without consulting someone who comprehends the word.
Auris Lionesse Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation 1087	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:40:00 - [16] - Quote Everyone point and laugh at op. Don't vote for iron wolf saber. Vote for someone who will help the community i.e. anyone else.
Yelhsa Jin-Mao Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation 354	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:40:00 - [17] - Quote WARxion ForDUST wrote: Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: I've been playing this game for the past 2 years. I've spent over $600 (SIX HUNDRED) buying packs and aurum on this game. I've accrued over 2.3 million lifetime WP, and you only award me a rank 9, NINE! This is quite frankly an absurd ratio, the amount of aurumn I have purchased and aurumn spent on this game should have warranted me at least a rank 13 if not the full 15. You seriously need to go back and revise the XP value of aurum purchased and aurum spent. I am seriously disappointed and quite frankly offended that you consider the financial support that I have provided this game to be of so little value in terms of loyalty to the game. You need to seriously revise the value you place on aurum purchased and aurum spent by a player, and I expect to see that loyalty ranking of mine increase exponentially the next time I log into this game. I wad seriously considering purchasing AT LEAST another $200 worth of aurum, but seeing as you consider the financial support of your game to be of so little value to you, I think I'll take my money and support another project instead on the likes of KICKSTARTER.COM You spent $600 on AUR in hope that on a nice sunny day CCP will implement a Rank system so you will be Rank 13 on patch day out of 15. It's not the unimplemented features like player market, EVE connection, PVE and the poorly optimised, clunky gameplay (now fixed maybe) that makes you angry, but this. Wow I've stuck with the game because of my heavy financial investment into the game, and believe that if CCP was to implement a system where those who have supported the game financially would be recognised for their efforts, that this system would be fair and favourable towards them. I DO NOT feel that the system they have implemented is a fair and favourable representation of those who have invested the most into this game, and for that reason, I am genuinely disappointed in CCP and quite frankly offended. And no, you CANT have my ISK!!!
Byozuma Kegawa Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 315	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:41:00 - [18] - Quote Wow Yelhsa, I was just going to write you off as just a whiny arse but you really ARE an entitled elitist. Please tell me you are American so I can rest in the knowledge that it hasn't become contagious yet. So you dropped a few hundred dollars in a game you like, big deal. So have I and I don't ask any more of it than the next person playing. Why? Because that money wasn't going to a private, "Devs kiss the left cheek lovingly" account. It was going to develop, maintain and update the game. You know, the costs of running an online game. You want special treatment, then you need to either play better during events or get a job with the company. Otherwise, cry us a river. Maybe they will build you a bridge... to get over it.
Maken Tosch Dust University Ivy League 10099	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:42:00 - [19] - Quote Aren't you the same guy that threatened a lawsuit against ccp? By the way how's that working out for you? You never answered that question. On Twitter: @HilmarVeigar #greenlightlegion #dust514 players are waiting.
ResistanceGTA D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 1669	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:43:00 - [20] - Quote Hmm, so it is balanced. You've spent 3 times the money, but have less than half my lifetime WP. There is a god. If you find an issue and I stumble upon your thread, I will do my darnedest to get the issue known. Also, Raptors...

Not Jadek Menaheim Xer Cloud Consortium 300	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:44:00 - [21] - Quote I'm level 10 op. Try the new Planetary Conquest Mode!
Denchlad 7 Dead Man's Game 1044	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:44:00 - [22] - Quote Ive spent -ú250 and im Rank 10. Then again, 3 million WP. The Connoisseur of Weapons. 19/19 L5 P2. Snarcasm > Sarcasm Excessively British.
sir RAVEN WING Huogikku Corporation Heiian Conglomerate 93	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:45:00 - [23] - Quote Stop whining, just take it as a challenge and make your way to the max, that's what I would do... Then again I'm probably guessing I'm at lvl 1 or 2 "All war is the result of one man's madness."
Auris Lionesse Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation 1087	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:46:00 - [24] - Quote i wonder what rank i am. what are the bonuses? Don't vote for iron wolf saber. Vote for someone who will help the community i.e. anyone else.
LT SHANKS Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 3756	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:49:00 - [25] - Quote Hey, OP. LOL!
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 2323	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:49:00 - [26] - Quote LOL you spent $600 on a free to play game. I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Breakin Stuff Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group 4478	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:51:00 - [27] - Quote ResistanceGTA wrote: Hmm, so it is balanced. You've spent 3 times the money, but have less than half my lifetime WP. There is a god. Just means I'll start lower or equal to you. I've posted more coin to dust than this git. I do hope my sanity doesn't vanish like his did. Butthurt doesn't look good on me. EVE Online is what you get when engineers attempt to create "fun" without consulting someone who comprehends the word.
Maken Tosch Dust University Ivy League 10099	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:51:00 - [28] - Quote There is more at play than how much you pay. War points are factored in as well as a lot of other things. On Twitter: @HilmarVeigar #greenlightlegion #dust514 players are waiting.
Mister Goo Abandoned Privilege Top Men. 59	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:58:00 - [29] - Quote Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: I've been playing this game for the past 2 years. I've spent over $600 (SIX HUNDRED) buying packs and aurum on this game. I've accrued over 2.3 million lifetime WP, and you only award me a rank 9, NINE! This is quite frankly an absurd ratio, the amount of aurumn I have purchased and aurumn spent on this game should have warranted me at least a rank 13 if not the full 15. You seriously need to go back and revise the XP value of aurum purchased and aurum spent. I am seriously disappointed and quite frankly offended that you consider the financial support that I have provided this game to be of so little value in terms of loyalty to the game. You need to seriously revise the value you place on aurum purchased and aurum spent by a player, and I expect to see that loyalty ranking of mine increase exponentially the next time I log into this game. I wad seriously considering purchasing AT LEAST another $200 worth of aurum, but seeing as you consider the financial support of your game to be of so little value to you, I think I'll take my money and support another project instead on the likes of KICKSTARTER.COM Just so you know I am level 10 and yes I have purchased aurum but this is not the major factor it is also about wp earned, logging in, fighting and winning battles. The purchase of Aurum is the last thing listed. Maybe you should spend more time playing the game than whining in the forums, if you want to increase your rank. Closed Beta Vet Minmatar Logistics I Repair, Revive, and Replenish. Leave the slaying for Assaults and Heavies.
Michael Epic The Neutral Zone 312	Posted - 2014.11.04 15:58:00 - [30] - Quote Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: I've been playing this game for the past 2 years. I've spent over $600 (SIX HUNDRED) buying packs and aurum on this game. I've accrued over 2.3 million lifetime WP, and you only award me a rank 9, NINE! This is quite frankly an absurd ratio, the amount of aurumn I have purchased and aurumn spent on this game should have warranted me at least a rank 13 if not the full 15. You seriously need to go back and revise the XP value of aurum purchased and aurum spent. I am seriously disappointed and quite frankly offended that you consider the financial support that I have provided this game to be of so little value in terms of loyalty to the game. You need to seriously revise the value you place on aurum purchased and aurum spent by a player, and I expect to see that loyalty ranking of mine increase exponentially the next time I log into this game. I wad seriously considering purchasing AT LEAST another $200 worth of aurum, but seeing as you consider the financial support of your game to be of so little value to you, I think I'll take my money and support another project instead on the likes of KICKSTARTER.COM I have spent maybe...$50-$100 on this game in the last two years and got rank 10 :D lol Be happy you didn't get rank 8 and get excited to reach rank 10....be grateful dude.



Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page