|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Thor Odinson42
molon labe. General Tso's Alliance
4802
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 14:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:I really want to see truly asymmetrical warfare, where people can use numbers to overwhelm a superior force or skill to overwhelm a larger force or what have you. But as long as you're forcing teams to be a certain size, and for one or both sides of the game to be assembled by a matchmaking system, I think you have to try for balance. And a sixteen-man team on voice comms should always beat a squad or two plus solo randoms. That isn't a good play experience for anyone.
A pubstomp isn't "competitive", nor is it "hardcore". It's easymode for the winning team, and there's no "competitive" in "no chance of winning".
So is your vision of Dust 16 v 16 solo play with no voice communication? Is this what you want to be known for?
I don't think anyone in their right mind wants to team deploy into a public skirmish. You'll have to link those posts or quote them here if you will.
You are the leader of dead alliance. Perhaps not that many share your vision of derp Dust.
Level 4 Forum Warrior
PSN: wbrom42
|
Thor Odinson42
molon labe. General Tso's Alliance
4802
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 14:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:So is your vision of Dust 16 v 16 solo play with no voice communication? Is this what you want to be known for? This is a logical fallacy called "strawman". It's where you intentionally misrepresent someone's position to make it easier to criticize. I am strongly in favor of players being able to play the game the way they want to. Whether that be as a squad, solo, casual, or hardcore player. Whether it's scamming or stealing, loyal to the cause or following whoever offers the highest paycheck, whatever. Forcing people to play "the Thor Odinson way" is not a game change I support.
Lol @ strawman, pot meet kettle.
But you seek a MMO type sandbox within the confines of a 16 v 16 game with objectives that are clearly defined. There is no free roam mode that you seek. You should push for that.
Also I don't see how having a team deploy mode that can be partaken in without the time limitations put forth by PC is changing the game. It's adding content that a LOT of people have been calling for.
Level 4 Forum Warrior
PSN: wbrom42
|
Thor Odinson42
molon labe. General Tso's Alliance
4802
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 15:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Would love a free roam mode, but I think something like that for DUST 514 as opposed to Legion is probably a dream that will never come true. The ability to just have as many people as you want land at a facility would be amazing. (And would make planetary conquest a workable mechanic instead of a joke.)
I never said I'm against a team deploy mode that can be partaken at any time. Notice my first post in the thread is in support of it. But I think team deploy teams should be fighting other team deploy teams in matchmaking. Maybe if a team deploys a couple short, the matchmaking could assemble randoms to fill out the ranks, but a full team deployment should, at bare minimum, be matched against a team deploy that is also larger than a single squad.
I didn't think you had it in you.
Slow clap.
Level 4 Forum Warrior
PSN: wbrom42
|
Thor Odinson42
molon labe. General Tso's Alliance
4806
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 15:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mobius Kaethis wrote:Soraya Xel wrote: A pubstomp isn't "competitive", nor is it "hardcore". It's easymode for the winning team, and there's no "competitive" in "no chance of winning".
You'll notice that in the OP what I proposed is not something that will lead to FW stomping at all. You seem to be ignoring the fact that I am calling for this to only happen in FW and not public matches at all. Pubs should remain a relatively safe place for new players and solo players alike where they don't have to worry about full teams that are actually coordinated. In FW though, as the goon said, the gloves should come off. FW is located in low sec, where anything goes. If an EvE corp wants to bring in a fleet of stealth bombers to camp a gate so be it. In dust the game should play out the same way, where players and corps are fully unrestricted in FW matches. I doesn't matter if teams are restricted in size to 16 or 1600 there should be a team deploy mode that allows organized groups of mercs to join FW matches all together. Eve players who choose to enter low sec space on their own do so at their own risk, the same should be said for Dust. Your call to have team deploy work only against other teams is totally out of line with the wild west nature of low sec and faction warfare space. Not only does such a concept deny players and corps their sandbox but it puts un-needed restrictions on a part of the game that is intended to have none.
Just another area that he fails to see the potential benefit to newer players. Give the more experienced players something shinier to do and it will allow more room for new and/or casual players in pubs.
Level 4 Forum Warrior
PSN: wbrom42
|
Thor Odinson42
molon labe. General Tso's Alliance
4810
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 16:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Being in FacWar doesn't make it any less likely to be a pubstomp. If there is no attempt at balance, then there's no challenging gameplay for anyone. Just a bad experience for both teams.
The main "restriction" that's at fault, is the 16 player team limit. If it was possible to pit an organized team against perhaps a slightly larger number of randoms to compensate, it might be possible to balance.
The reason EVE balance isn't relevant here, is because in EVE you can swarm/outnumber an opponent, but DUST makes this impossible. Trying to make the EVE sov system work in DUST (planetary conquest) largely failed for the same reason.
What if players got together and attempted to get better to get whatever goodies are there that would make it worth their time and effort?
What if players joined FW channels and people built teams in a similar manner to preparation for PC?
What if the stuff was so rewarding that it made people buy FW boosters?
What if there was something worth fighting for in Dust?
Level 4 Forum Warrior
PSN: wbrom42
|
Thor Odinson42
molon labe. General Tso's Alliance
4810
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 16:18:00 -
[6] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Just another area that he fails to see the potential benefit to newer players. Give the more experienced players something shinier to do and it will allow more room for new and/or casual players in pubs. Strongly wishing to encourage veterans to play in FacWar. That does, in part require ensuring FacWar is a satisfying, challenging, and rewarding experience. I do want to get vets out of pubs. And I'm not opposed to team deploy. If team deploys in FacWar were pitted against other team deploys, you would have essentially the old corp battles system (which was the old FacWar system) running on the new FacWar system.
If you limited it to team vs team without any room for fill ins then you'd end up with lopsided matches due to disconnects, etc. You'd also end up with annoying long queue times which is hard to imagine given the long queue times currently.
You seem to look down on others ideas a LOT without coming up with any solutions or alternative ideas. You are the "that guy".
Level 4 Forum Warrior
PSN: wbrom42
|
Thor Odinson42
molon labe. General Tso's Alliance
4819
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 17:42:00 -
[7] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:If you limited it to team vs team without any room for fill ins then you'd end up with lopsided matches due to disconnects, etc. You'd also end up with annoying long queue times which is hard to imagine given the long queue times currently. Actually, if you did this thing called "reading my posts", I specifically suggested that matchmaking would still be used to fill teams where the team deploy was short of 16 people. Say if one used team deploy to deploy two squads of six, or had 14 people, or whatever. Mobius Kaethis wrote:Thor is making very good points here. Thor might make good points if he read posts. But he didn't, so he isn't.
I must admit that I didn't catch that.
You have a funny way of agreeing with people.
Level 4 Forum Warrior
PSN: wbrom42
|
|
|
|