|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Forlorn Destrier
Havok Dynasty
2766
   |
Posted - 2014.09.29 21:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
Bax Zanith wrote:This isn't a qq thread. Some threads i've been reading recently was arguments about scouts, and how there so much better at assaulting than the assault class. More importantly i've been watching Mat Pat's game theory videos on youtube. That cuppuled with some of judge's videos gave me an idea. Rather than scream at one another "this is OP, your a scrub!" Or "this is perfectly fine, your a scrub!" Why not try to analyze both classes, and use hard cold math and logic to find out if the scout really is better at assaulting than the assault class.
The only problem is; math isn't my forta, it's dull to me, and I was never good at it. So this thread is essentially crowed sourcing. With the help of you guys, we might be able to put this argument to rest. My first question to the forum is what specific data do I need to look into, what factors of both classes do I need to look at and consider?
I have an idea where to kind of start out, probably the most obvious things. I was going to compare raw stats of each race's assault and scout suits with each other (EX; ammar scout stats vs. Amarr assault stats.), organizing them by level. Then compare slot numbers.
This isn't to prove scouts are op, this is to answer the question "is the scout class really better at assaulting than the assault class?" Helpful and constrictive replies would be appreciated.
Spelling is also not your forte (note the use of the letter "e" and not the letter "a"). Also, coupled, not cuppuled.
I am the Forgotten Warhorse, the Lord of Lightning
|
Forlorn Destrier
Havok Dynasty
2766
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 22:40:00 -
[2] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:Forlorn Destrier wrote:Bax Zanith wrote:This isn't a qq thread. Some threads i've been reading recently was arguments about scouts, and how there so much better at assaulting than the assault class. More importantly i've been watching Mat Pat's game theory videos on youtube. That cuppuled with some of judge's videos gave me an idea. Rather than scream at one another "this is OP, your a scrub!" Or "this is perfectly fine, your a scrub!" Why not try to analyze both classes, and use hard cold math and logic to find out if the scout really is better at assaulting than the assault class.
The only problem is; math isn't my forta, it's dull to me, and I was never good at it. So this thread is essentially crowed sourcing. With the help of you guys, we might be able to put this argument to rest. My first question to the forum is what specific data do I need to look into, what factors of both classes do I need to look at and consider?
I have an idea where to kind of start out, probably the most obvious things. I was going to compare raw stats of each race's assault and scout suits with each other (EX; ammar scout stats vs. Amarr assault stats.), organizing them by level. Then compare slot numbers.
This isn't to prove scouts are op, this is to answer the question "is the scout class really better at assaulting than the assault class?" Helpful and constrictive replies would be appreciated. Spelling is also not your forte (note the use of the letter "e" and not the letter "a"). Also, coupled, not cuppuled.  The least you could have done was given some feedback on the actual topic too...
No, the least I could have done was to say "Bacon" and left it at that
I am the Forgotten Warhorse, the Lord of Lightning
|
Forlorn Destrier
Havok Dynasty
2766
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 22:56:00 -
[3] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:Forlorn Destrier wrote:One Eyed King wrote:Forlorn Destrier wrote:Bax Zanith wrote:This isn't a qq thread. Some threads i've been reading recently was arguments about scouts, and how there so much better at assaulting than the assault class. More importantly i've been watching Mat Pat's game theory videos on youtube. That cuppuled with some of judge's videos gave me an idea. Rather than scream at one another "this is OP, your a scrub!" Or "this is perfectly fine, your a scrub!" Why not try to analyze both classes, and use hard cold math and logic to find out if the scout really is better at assaulting than the assault class.
The only problem is; math isn't my forta, it's dull to me, and I was never good at it. So this thread is essentially crowed sourcing. With the help of you guys, we might be able to put this argument to rest. My first question to the forum is what specific data do I need to look into, what factors of both classes do I need to look at and consider?
I have an idea where to kind of start out, probably the most obvious things. I was going to compare raw stats of each race's assault and scout suits with each other (EX; ammar scout stats vs. Amarr assault stats.), organizing them by level. Then compare slot numbers.
This isn't to prove scouts are op, this is to answer the question "is the scout class really better at assaulting than the assault class?" Helpful and constrictive replies would be appreciated. Spelling is also not your forte (note the use of the letter "e" and not the letter "a"). Also, coupled, not cuppuled. The least you could have done was given some feedback on the actual topic too... No, the least I could have done was to say "Bacon" and left it at that I think you underestimate the value of Bacon, such that even its mention provides the image and hope of future Bacon.
I'm hungry now.
I am the Forgotten Warhorse, the Lord of Lightning
|
|
|
| |
|