DUST Search - Delta Feedback: Plasma Cannon

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

Delta Feedback: Plasma Cannon

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Sgt Kirk Fatal Absolution 7653	Posted - 2014.09.27 04:01:00 - [31] - Quote Adipem Nothi wrote: @ Ghaz Earlier today I would've agreed with you. But the more I use the updated PLC, the more I appreciate Delta's changes. I freely defer to your expertise, though I'd respectfully urge you to give it a shot. Gaz wants his ego stroked by people watching his videos going "OMG SOO CUUEL!!11!" Sure, plasma cannon isn't as hard to hit targets anymore but it's still one of the most skill required weapons in the game, even with speed increased and arc decreased. People who want the exaggerated parabolic arc back are usually the type that didn't want to accept (and fought against even) that the plasma cannon was intended as AV. Giving selfish reasons as to why. This is no different. Something's wrong when you regret Things that haven't happened yet
XxGhazbaranxX Eternal Beings Dark Taboo 1728	Posted - 2014.09.27 04:19:00 - [32] - Quote Sgt Kirk wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: @ Ghaz Earlier today I would've agreed with you. But the more I use the updated PLC, the more I appreciate Delta's changes. I freely defer to your expertise, though I'd respectfully urge you to give it a shot. Gaz wants his ego stroked by people watching his videos going "OMG SOO CUUEL!!11!" Sure, plasma cannon isn't as hard to hit targets anymore but it's still one of the most skill required weapons in the game, even with speed increased and arc decreased. People who want the exaggerated parabolic arc back are usually the type that didn't want to accept (and fought against even) that the plasma cannon was intended as AV. Giving selfish reasons as to why. This is no different. Ahh here we go... Grabs popcorn Plasma Cannon Advocate Dust 514 Survivor
Breakin Stuff Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group 3237	Posted - 2014.09.27 06:40:00 - [33] - Quote No touchy the gravity!
Breakin Stuff Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group 3238	Posted - 2014.09.27 07:31:00 - [34] - Quote Aim assist is a cheap shot ghaz. Fortunately it's worthless to me.
XxGhazbaranxX Eternal Beings Dark Taboo 1730	Posted - 2014.09.27 15:08:00 - [35] - Quote You know what, I don't want to inflame the forums with my old ways. This old dog will just have to learn new tricks. If so many people like it, who am I to make CCP change something That the community likes and is not detrimental to gameplay Plasma Cannon Advocate Dust 514 Survivor
Breakin Stuff Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group 3254	Posted - 2014.09.27 18:02:00 - [36] - Quote XxGhazbaranxX wrote: You know what, I don't want to inflame the forums with my old ways. This old dog will just have to learn new tricks. If so many people like it, who am I to make CCP change something That the community likes and is not detrimental to gameplay Push for one variant that behaves like the version you like.
RKKR The Southern Legion Final Resolution. 1036	Posted - 2014.09.27 20:50:00 - [37] - Quote Sgt Kirk wrote: People who want the exaggerated parabolic arc back are usually the type that didn't want to accept (and fought against even) that the plasma cannon was intended as AV. Giving selfish reasons as to why. This is no different. Please let me know how I hit a running HAV behind a stupid little slope/hill (or dropship parked on a high point that isn't directly hitable) now instead of lashing out at people with stupid bullshit...wasn't a problem with the old arc (and speed) .
Coleman Gray Opus Arcana Covert Intervention 1217	Posted - 2014.09.28 08:18:00 - [38] - Quote As good as hitting stuff with an arc is, it's a cannon not a mortar, it works far better as a close range AV weapon that is capable of hitting vehicles now without guess work with a the old arc. Original Commando, before all you posers just saying
CommanderBolt KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 1798	Posted - 2014.09.28 08:42:00 - [39] - Quote I love it as is and I wouldnt change it personally. Yea of course see if CCP can make a vairaint with more of an arc. My personal issue is, the weapon has reasonable range now. Bringing back more arcing would just make it a lot harder to engage vehicles again. I know you can attack vehicles with the arc, but the second they start moving away the plasma cannon struggles more and more to get a hit off. You dont have that problem with swarms and forges until they get out of range or break line of sight. They are my reasons for keeping the PLC as is. But again, like I said, I would love to see a secondary version with more arcing if that's what some of the old PLC vets want. (Ive only been using the PLC a month or two so I have adapted to the changes quite fast) "Also I think knives are a good idea, big f**k-off shiny ones" "Guns for show, Knives for a pro" MY LIFE FOR AIUR!
RKKR The Southern Legion Final Resolution. 1036	Posted - 2014.09.28 08:59:00 - [40] - Quote PLC as close range AV? If you use it for close range then you shouldn't have had troubles with the arc in the first place. Another example...a vehicle behind a fence: the old PLC would easily hit it while I'm safe in cover, the new PLC? Can't hit it because it flies over the vehicle or against the fence unless There is nothing between me and the vehicle (making you vurnable) The arc is needed.

Breakin Stuff Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group 3260	Posted - 2014.09.28 13:13:00 - [41] - Quote RKKR wrote: PLC as close range AV? If you use it for close range then you shouldn't have had troubles with the arc in the first place. Another example...a vehicle behind a fence: the old PLC would easily hit it while I'm safe in cover, the new PLC? Can't hit it because it flies over the vehicle or against the fence unless There is nothing between me and the vehicle (making you vurnable) The arc is needed. no it is not. I like being able to hit an ADS higher than 30m thanks
RKKR The Southern Legion Final Resolution. 1036	Posted - 2014.09.28 13:45:00 - [42] - Quote Breakin Stuff wrote: RKKR wrote: PLC as close range AV? If you use it for close range then you shouldn't have had troubles with the arc in the first place. Another example...a vehicle behind a fence: the old PLC would easily hit it while I'm safe in cover, the new PLC? Can't hit it because it flies over the vehicle or against the fence unless There is nothing between me and the vehicle (making you vurnable) The arc is needed. no it is not. I like being able to hit an ADS higher than 30m thanks OK I'm convinced because Breaking stuff is able to hit dropships at the cost of other stuff the PLC used to do.
manboar thunder fist Dead Man's Game 142	Posted - 2014.09.28 13:46:00 - [43] - Quote yep just one more notch to the head of the ADS pilot. rip NERF SCOUTS, NERF TANKS, NERF AV, NERF ASSAULTS, NERF LOGIS, NERF HEAVIES nerf life Delta- bye bye ads, bye bye scr


Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.