It has been verified by CCP Rattati that large blaster turrets are AV! Stop asking for them to be 1.7 on infantry again!!! It's ********! It was ******** then, now, and in the future! Small turrets, got it! Large ones are anti-vehicle now and forever! I don't wanna see not one more post begging ccp to make large blaster turrets 1.7 stupid again you easy mode scrubs!!!! o-*******-7

Large turrets should be anti-infantry. If you're dumb enough to walk in front of one, you deserve to get creamed by it.
You must be one of those guys who likes to run the "chicken cross the road gauntlet". Which means whenever you see a blaster tank you try to run across the center of the road to get to the other side... Instead of waiting or choosing another route.

You want your tank stolen? Put on a small turret. You will never get that guy out of that turret till you die.

We should force infantry to have a co-pilot, so that someone can steal their suit if they equip a gun designed to attack infantry.

"You want a gun, get the co-pilot slot! I don't want to see any more of you lazy 'solo wannabees' clogging my forums anymore! You are easy mode scrubs who don't deserve to play!"
--Sponsored by Bradric Banewolf's Brainless Bane, now with 50% fewer braincells!

They're anti-vehicle with anti-infantry suppression. That what they said to justify the bravo(?) turret nerf. Meaning, they're best suited for AV, but still a threat to infantry, though not as effective as, say, a small blaster or missile (on a dropship for example).

Insulting my intelligence seems to be the forums only comeback when met with facts, logic, and reason lol! You sir have no point, and are seriously considering me to be a guy who can articulate multiple threads about different issues, but spends his days in-game running in front of blaster tanks? I was actually trying to help blaster tankers stop belittling themselves?! Incessantly asking CCP to make blaster tanks more accurate when CCP rattati has already publicly stated that blasters are primarily AV, is stupid?!

1.7 update was an epic fail! (and i'm sure someone got fired behind it) Stop wishing you could go back to it. You've padded your kdr you should be good, right? Wait..... Have I blown you up before? Ah, who's counting anymore at this point?!

As usual, if you have no useful input leave the hate for in-game hate-mail please. Intelligent people are here in the forums working on balance. o7

have fun with gunlogis next patch then scrub. how is using a railgun kdr padding? explain it to me because from what i see missle tanks are murdering infantry. When i get in my railgun i dont go out thinking no matter what im gonna kill whatever gets in my way. No i think im gonna kill this scrub blaster/missle tank user thats murdering my blues. If i could get back my sp that i put into blasters i would put it into SL's.

Translation: "I am completely blocking out the entire point of the comment regarding the fact that if one wants to put a small turret on their tank, they must allow someone else the ability to completely destroy the tank's actual use. I am also in denial about the concept that requiring a second person in order to use an anti-infantry weapon on a dropsuit would be the parallel to this situation, because I simply do not want to think about it, as it inconveniences me and makes my argument rather problematic. instead I will simply try to shove them off on some vague statement on intelligence then use a symbol that I think means a salute, but has a secondary meaning as a snub emote."

Look at the person
ovo
turn your head
o>
snub
o7

Every heard of a Forge Gun?

explain it to me because from what i see missle tanks are murdering infantry.

Sometimes I swear this place is secretly ran by monkeys?!

You know full well what I mean when I started the thread! If i'm in the open foolishly then yes it can kill me, but the days of whole teams hiding from the ridiculously accurate indestructible blaster tank in ambush never need to return! That is all!

So which turret is infantry then?