DUST Search - Complex Codebreakers still not coming to Highs in Delta?

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

Complex Codebreakers still not coming to Highs in Delta?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Sgt Kirk Fatal Absolution 7411	Posted - 2014.08.31 02:01:00 - [1] - Quote Just asking. If so, The Complex Codebreakers need to have more CPU usage and much, much less PG usage. I'm not sure why it uses that much PG in the first place tbh. Lucent Echelon -The Brightest Ranks Gallente Faction Warfare Chanel
Atiim 11737	Posted - 2014.08.31 03:05:00 - [2] - Quote If you get Codebreakers in your High Slots then I want Damage Amplifiers in my Low Slots. DUST 514's 1st Matari Commando -HAND
Leovarian L Lavitz G0DS AM0NG MEN General Tso's Alliance 1146	Posted - 2014.08.31 03:15:00 - [3] - Quote Atiim wrote: If you get Codebreakers in your High Slots then I want Damage Amplifiers in my Low Slots. That's the way it should be, don't know why it isn't that way. kin-cats should stay low slot items, they are the equivalent to the overdrive injectors in eve. Omni-Soldier Few are my equal in these specialties, none compare in all of them
Logi Bro Brutor Vanguard Minmatar Republic 3286	Posted - 2014.08.31 03:20:00 - [4] - Quote I like the idea, there are so few high slot choices. Atiim wrote: If you get Codebreakers in your High Slots then I want Damage Amplifiers in my Low Slots. You obviously haven't thought that through. What are armor tankers expected to do without damage mods in the highs? You can either dual tank with shield mods, use precision enhancers(basically useless on non-light frames), or use mybrofil mods(useless on slow suits, oh by the way, armor tankers are slow). So in the end, all you can practically do is dual tank. SP Sinks? Fixed.
Leovarian L Lavitz G0DS AM0NG MEN General Tso's Alliance 1147	Posted - 2014.08.31 03:21:00 - [5] - Quote Logi Bro wrote: I like the idea, there are so few high slot choices. Atiim wrote: If you get Codebreakers in your High Slots then I want Damage Amplifiers in my Low Slots. You obviously haven't thought that through. What are armor tankers expected to do without damage mods in the highs? You can either dual tank with shield mods, use precision enhancers(basically useless on non-light frames), or use mybrofil mods(useless on slow suits, oh by the way, armor tankers are slow). So in the end, all you can practically do is dual tank. Or you can use the shiny new codebreakers in the high slots. Omni-Soldier Few are my equal in these specialties, none compare in all of them
Zindorak 1.U.P 754	Posted - 2014.08.31 03:24:00 - [6] - Quote Atiim wrote: If you get Codebreakers in your High Slots then I want Damage Amplifiers in my Low Slots. No that will kill my Am assault Pokemon master! CCP undo ScP nerf. It hurt my feering very bad
Logi Bro Brutor Vanguard Minmatar Republic 3286	Posted - 2014.08.31 03:27:00 - [7] - Quote Leovarian L Lavitz wrote: Logi Bro wrote: I like the idea, there are so few high slot choices. Atiim wrote: If you get Codebreakers in your High Slots then I want Damage Amplifiers in my Low Slots. You obviously haven't thought that through. What are armor tankers expected to do without damage mods in the highs? You can either dual tank with shield mods, use precision enhancers(basically useless on non-light frames), or use mybrofil mods(useless on slow suits, oh by the way, armor tankers are slow). So in the end, all you can practically do is dual tank. Or you can use the shiny new codebreakers in the high slots. So they get two choices. Wow. Codebreakers are a niche module to say the least. They have zero combat efficacy. All you would be doing is moving 95% of current armor+damage tankers to dual tank, and the last 5% will use codebreakers because they actually think they are useful. At least our current two choices are 50/50 split in usage. SP Sinks? Fixed.
Leovarian L Lavitz G0DS AM0NG MEN General Tso's Alliance 1147	Posted - 2014.08.31 03:31:00 - [8] - Quote Logi Bro wrote: Leovarian L Lavitz wrote: Logi Bro wrote: I like the idea, there are so few high slot choices. Atiim wrote: If you get Codebreakers in your High Slots then I want Damage Amplifiers in my Low Slots. You obviously haven't thought that through. What are armor tankers expected to do without damage mods in the highs? You can either dual tank with shield mods, use precision enhancers(basically useless on non-light frames), or use mybrofil mods(useless on slow suits, oh by the way, armor tankers are slow). So in the end, all you can practically do is dual tank. Or you can use the shiny new codebreakers in the high slots. So they get two choices. Wow. Codebreakers are a niche module to say the least. They have zero combat efficacy. All you would be doing is moving 95% of current armor+damage tankers to dual tank, and the last 5% will use codebreakers because they actually think they are useful. At least our current two choices are 50/50 split in usage. codebreakers are useful, i run 4 complex plus hacking 5 on my minmatar logi Omni-Soldier Few are my equal in these specialties, none compare in all of them
Leovarian L Lavitz G0DS AM0NG MEN General Tso's Alliance 1147	Posted - 2014.08.31 03:31:00 - [9] - Quote Zindorak wrote: Atiim wrote: If you get Codebreakers in your High Slots then I want Damage Amplifiers in my Low Slots. No that will kill my Am assault no it won't, amarr is supposed to brick tank. i say move reactive plates to high slots. now you have more options to brickety brick. Omni-Soldier Few are my equal in these specialties, none compare in all of them
Zindorak 1.U.P 756	Posted - 2014.08.31 03:34:00 - [10] - Quote Leovarian L Lavitz wrote: Zindorak wrote: Atiim wrote: If you get Codebreakers in your High Slots then I want Damage Amplifiers in my Low Slots. No that will kill my Am assault no it won't, amarr is supposed to brick tank. i say move reactive plates to high slots. now you have more options to brickety brick. How are we supposed to brick tank with only 2-3 High slots? Pokemon master! CCP undo ScP nerf. It hurt my feering very bad

Logi Bro Brutor Vanguard Minmatar Republic 3287	Posted - 2014.08.31 03:37:00 - [11] - Quote Leovarian L Lavitz wrote: codebreakers are useful, i run 4 complex plus hacking 5 on my minmatar logi And yet, of all the blueberries out there, how many of them do you actually think know that? I'd say about 5%. And realistically, why do shield tankers need to damage tank as well? You already get a module for your shields in the lows, armor tankers don't get anything related to armor for their highs. If they made an armor resist module for the high slots, I'd gladly agree with you. SP Sinks? Fixed.
OZAROW Opus Arcana Covert Intervention 1531	Posted - 2014.08.31 03:43:00 - [12] - Quote Atiim wrote: If you get Codebreakers in your High Slots then I want Damage Amplifiers in my Low Slots. Amen brother, amen. Yes, you just got rocked by a guy with a BOLT PISTOL and a pair of knives! !
Leovarian L Lavitz G0DS AM0NG MEN General Tso's Alliance 1147	Posted - 2014.08.31 03:44:00 - [13] - Quote no it won't, amarr is supposed to brick tank. i say move reactive plates to high slots. now you have more options to brickety brick. I think shield regulators should increase efficacy of shield extenders, rechargers and energizers by 10%, stackable and also give their current shield depleted/delay bonus based on tier So, Basic shield regulator +10% efficacy to midslot shield modules and +15% reduction shield delay advanced shield regulator +10% efficacy to midslot shield modules and +25% reduction shield delay complex shield regulator +10% efficacy to midslot shield modules and 35% reduction shield delay Reactive plates in the high slots would inrease the efficacy of low slot armor modules by 10%, stacking penalized while still giving their current hp bonus and rep amount. Omni-Soldier Few are my equal in these specialties, none compare in all of them
Alena Ventrallis Vengeance Unbound Dark Taboo 1640	Posted - 2014.08.31 03:52:00 - [14] - Quote Frankly, I'd have kincats and cardiac regs moved to high slots. LEt's armor compensate for their weakness without sacrificing slots. Shoot Scout with yes.
Sgt Kirk Fatal Absolution 7411	Posted - 2014.08.31 03:58:00 - [15] - Quote Kinkats, Cardiac Regulators and Codebreakers need to be moved to highslots then I'd be alright with moving damage mods to Lows. what I'm seeing from this thread is the typical whiny shield user who wants everything given to him with no regards to balance. Lucent Echelon -The Brightest Ranks Gallente Faction Warfare Chanel
Tectonic Fusion 2100	Posted - 2014.08.31 05:52:00 - [16] - Quote Atiim wrote: If you get Codebreakers in your High Slots then I want Damage Amplifiers in my Low Slots. LOL just make it so you can use it on both. It won't break anything. (GIF)
Ghost Kaisar Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance 6866	Posted - 2014.08.31 06:08:00 - [17] - Quote Zindorak wrote: Atiim wrote: If you get Codebreakers in your High Slots then I want Damage Amplifiers in my Low Slots. No that will kill my Am assault Move Armor reps to highs? FA's Stabber Extraordinaire Minmatar Enthusiast Explosions and Bulletstorm? Count me in!
Atiim 11747	Posted - 2014.08.31 07:26:00 - [18] - Quote Sgt Kirk wrote: Kinkats, Cardiac Regulators and Codebreakers need to be moved to highslots then I'd be alright with moving damage mods to Lows. what I'm seeing from this thread is the typical whiny shield user who wants everything given to him with no regards to balance. Is this referring to me? If so, then lol. All of my dropsuits have an even distribution of high and low slots, so changing which slot any module goes into for personal gain is not only redundant, but stupid as well.. As for KinCats, lolno. Moving Kincats to High Slots would allow people to stack insane amounts of Armor while still moving exceedingly fast, thus allowing Armor Tankers to negate the main weakness that Armor Tanking is supposed to have. Moving Damage Amplifiers to the Low Slots won't cause an imbalance, as you wouldn't be able to negate the main weakness of Shield Tanking, which is having competitively low HP. DUST 514's 1st Matari Commando -HAND
iKILLu osborne Dead Man's Game 223	Posted - 2014.08.31 08:12:00 - [19] - Quote crazy whacky fun super idea!! anything can be fitted anywhere with each module type recieving a stacking penalty p.s. i am drunk "uh guys" "i got to go back to the depot that installation made me crap my dropsuit"
Apothecary Za'ki Biomass Positive 697	Posted - 2014.08.31 13:02:00 - [20] - Quote Sgt Kirk wrote: Just asking. If so, The Complex Codebreakers need to have more CPU usage and much, much less PG usage. I'm not sure why it uses that much PG in the first place tbh. no because Brick tanked armor scouts. [[LogiBro in Training]] Level 1 Forum Pariah

Sgt Kirk Fatal Absolution 7421	Posted - 2014.08.31 14:51:00 - [21] - Quote Atiim wrote: Sgt Kirk wrote: Kinkats, Cardiac Regulators and Codebreakers need to be moved to highslots then I'd be alright with moving damage mods to Lows. what I'm seeing from this thread is the typical whiny shield user who wants everything given to him with no regards to balance. Is this referring to me? If so, then lol. All of my dropsuits have an even distribution of high and low slots, so changing which slot any module goes into for personal gain is not only redundant, but stupid as well.. As for KinCats, lolno. Moving Kincats to High Slots would allow people to stack insane amounts of Armor while still moving exceedingly fast, thus allowing Armor Tankers to negate the main weakness that Armor Tanking is supposed to have. Moving Damage Amplifiers to the Low Slots won't cause an imbalance, as you wouldn't be able to negate the main weakness of Shield Tanking, which is having competitively low HP. there are other penalties armor gives to suits,walking speed, jump height and strafing speed. None of those can be negated by a kinkat, the only thing that can be is the sprint speed. gasp so ground breaking. That's the way it is in Eve and you dont see people mad about Amarr fitting a MWD on a Battle Cruiser. So yes, Damage mod to low slot in trade of Kinkats, Cards, and Codebreakers. Seems like more than a good trade. If youre Caldari you can keep people at a distance better with more damage and Minmatar balance speed with armor and shields anyway so it won't change too much. But one thing for certain is that shields can't have damage mods unless they gave something up. You can't have everything. Lucent Echelon -The Brightest Ranks Gallente Faction Warfare Chanel
Sgt Kirk Fatal Absolution 7421	Posted - 2014.08.31 15:01:00 - [22] - Quote Apothecary Za'ki wrote: Sgt Kirk wrote: Just asking. If so, The Complex Codebreakers need to have more CPU usage and much, much less PG usage. I'm not sure why it uses that much PG in the first place tbh. no because Brick tanked armor scouts. What about them? Kinkats only effect sprint speed. Not strafe speed which is the problem with brick scouts now. Like I said previously it doesnt give you back movement, jump height, or strafe, just sprint. Besides, CCP said they were going to address armor stacking on scouts later so you probably won't have to deal with brick Cal and Gal scouts in Echo. Lucent Echelon -The Brightest Ranks Gallente Faction Warfare Chanel


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.