sir we not need to know your opinion of what you like that is why there is a "like" button

if you don't like his suggestions,make your own.

Some may think of it as dumbing it down or catering to the lowest common denominator or the like, but I simply don't see a lot of people getting excited and jumping on board FW for titles they don't understand and tbh are not likely to invest the time into doing so. Maybe that's what some people want, for it to be somewhat elitist (I'm not saying any of this necessarily applies to you personally). I don't really think that should be the case, myself.

That's my contrarian argument: While these are well thought out titles, they are (perhaps unfortunately) incomprehensible to the majority of players and most likely won't add to the FW experience or increase interest in FW in the manner you hope it will. (or in the way Rattati envisioned when he initially floated the idea)

I think that appropriately themed ranks/titles, like those proposed by Kagehoshi or True, but which are also more accessible, will accomplish the goals of both rewarding loyal players and giving extra incentive for those not currently invested in a particular fashion to do so.

I invite your counter-argument to that.... beyond a variation on "it's too dull or pedestrian" or "mine is better because of x". That's already been covered. We all think our own hard work is great, so I am not necessarily interested in why you feel yours is better.

Instead, I would like to know what you see as the major flaw in using more accessible or military-themed language? What is "wrong" (for lack of a better term) with that?

Sorry for the long box folks.
didn't want to edit the hard work put in

really like the suggestions, if i could extend on the idea slightly..
Rather than dumbing the titles down, (let's face it dust is kind of the thinking persons fps)
how about we have the phonetics for the words along with the meanings available to players via the hints screen during loading times?
This would make the player base familiar with the difficult terminology both to pronounce it easily and to know the meanings without any drastic effort or re-working.

Idk, Mina, we are probably going to have to agree to disagree. Personally I see your titles as a little incongruous with an infantry-based game. So, I stand by my statement that they should really be more accessible, and certainly more martial and less mythical.

(You also didn't exactly answer my question, but whatever. Not answering it is an indirect answer, if that makes sense.)