|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Atiim
Onslaught Inc
RISE of LEGION
11204
   |
Posted - 2014.08.03 02:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
Which point should I address first?
The redline argument or the fact that the entire second half your your argument is a fallacy?
If I don't, who will?
-HAND
|
Atiim
Onslaught Inc
RISE of LEGION
11206
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 02:42:00 -
[2] - Quote
Egonz4 wrote:Atiim wrote:Which point should I address first?
The redline argument or the fact that the entire second half your your argument is a fallacy? Haha....prove to me that redline snipers aren't cheap sissies
First, prove to me that all snipers are in the redline, and that they're "cheap sissies".
Your the one who made the assertion, so burden of proof is on you, not me.
If I don't, who will?
-HAND
|
Atiim
Onslaught Inc
RISE of LEGION
11206
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 02:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
ladwar wrote:Im a cheap redline sniper 
And your one of the 100s of Snipers, so this is null.
That's like me saying "I'm a male, and I use Commandos, so only males use Commandos".
If I don't, who will?
-HAND
|
Atiim
Onslaught Inc
RISE of LEGION
11214
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 05:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
emm kay wrote:
are you saying that we should reward these people that snipe in the redline?
Where in that post did I say that players within the redline should be rewarded?
Egonz4 wrote:
No that's no the same at all......using a tactic that gets you a lot of kills with little risk is being a sissy......it's cheap.
Why don't you see this?
The logic behind it is indeed the same.
- Ladwar's logic: I am Y, and use X therefore all X users must be Y
- Your logic: All X users are Y
- Logic used in my example: I'm Y, and I use X, so only Y uses X.
They're all the same in the sense that while they aren't worded exactly the same, they all claim that X users (in the case being Snipers) are Y (in the case being "cheap redline sissies"); which is indeed a fallacy.
There's nothing to see other than you being unable to form a logical and coherent reason as to why Sniper Rifles shouldn't be viable, while also conforming to a logical fallacy.
If I don't, who will?
-HAND
|
Atiim
Onslaught Inc
RISE of LEGION
11214
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 05:16:00 -
[5] - Quote
Alena Ventrallis wrote:
Way back in the day, there were plenty of sniper spots outside the redline. Then people whined and bitched about it, and CCP removed them. Now the good spots are in the redline.
Give snipers their perches back, and your argument of "redline snipers are sissies" will hold water. Until then, I'm going to snipe from the best vantage position on whatever map I'm on.
Unfortunately, that would require a client side update, meaning that it won't happen. 
If I don't, who will?
-HAND
|
Atiim
Onslaught Inc
RISE of LEGION
11232
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 21:37:00 -
[6] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:
You'd have a hard time convincing me that 90% of matches wouldn't be filled with snipers if they buffed the role.
We wouldn't need to.
You're the one who says it would be, so burden of proof rests in your hands.
If I don't, who will?
-HAND
|
|
|
| |
|