|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3247
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 04:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfW4XBP7A7c
Now, OH played a good game but I'm curious to know if this is what CCP envisioned? Is it ok that players are invisible longer than they are visible and in a competitive match? Only popping out just to OHK you?
If this isn't evidence that the cloak needs to have the same cooldown mechanic as every other module (with a cooldown) in the game, then there is nothing else you can do.
This isn't a dig at the player that's abusing the mechanic either.....this is a dig at cloaking in dust and how crazy it is.
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3247
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 04:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
Hakyou Brutor wrote:Easy fix: Run precision enhancers.
You really think so?
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3247
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 04:41:00 -
[3] - Quote
Fiddlestaxp wrote:I give OH credit because they were scout addicts before it was FOTM and they stuck around. End of credit being given.
But the scout suit isn't the issue at hand.....it's the cloak
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3247
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 05:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
1st Lieutenant Tiberius wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote:I give OH credit because they were scout addicts before it was FOTM and they stuck around. End of credit being given. Thanks fiddle, I appreciate it :) I'm a ****** bootleg scout though, not even gonna lie. MnM are the true scouts (Moody, Nega, Musturd) But dubbs, I see what you're saying but maybe you forgot how much PC lags, everything is just so much more sluggish in PC than pubs for some reason I cannot fathom it might just be a graphical issue I'm not really sure, cloaks are honestly not so much of a problem, it really isn't hard to notice if you're vigilant and Hakyou is right, precision fit hunter scouts truly solves the problem IMO
There was a point where they were looking for the guy lol and couldn't find him because he stood still between the opening on the objective. At one point, he even went behind boundaries...no way could they have spotted him back there.
I remember testing precision enhancers vs dampeners. And I remember not being able to see a gal scout with one dampener and a cloak no matter how many enhancers I had. So, I'm under the impression that precision modules' has a limit to low they can scan.
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3247
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 05:04:00 -
[5] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfW4XBP7A7cNow, OH played a good game but I'm curious to know if this is what CCP envisioned? Is it ok that players are invisible longer than they are visible and in a competitive match? Only popping out just to OHK you? If this isn't evidence that the cloak needs to have the same cooldown mechanic as every other module (with a cooldown) in the game, then there is nothing else you can do. This isn't a dig at the player that's abusing the mechanic either.....this is a dig at cloaking in dust and how crazy it is. Cyrius Li Moody best Min scout in the game besides Mr Mustard ERA blind......
So, what you're saying is that you would be able to do better and be able to spot him? That your situational awareness is even better than Espeon's? Cause I saw Espeon standing near him and he didn't know he was there either.
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3249
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 09:00:00 -
[6] - Quote
Cyrius Li-Moody wrote:Thank you. Thank you very much. I'm an assassin, doing what an assassin does best.
QQ Min scouts. QQ knives. QQ the fact that they could have countered me if they put on the right fit or actually kept their eyes open. Oh wait every Cal scout is a slayer scout that doesn't run precision. QQ my 400 hp and terrible regen. QQ me having to use 4 slots and an adv main weapon so I can hide from idiots.
Hilarious thread considering how many gal shotgunners exist with double my eHP.
"abuse" hahahahahahahahhahaa
ps- Have a like. +1
If you read my post, you'll notice that I wrote that it wasn't a dig at you. It's a dig at how ridiculous the cloak is. You can practically be invisible for the entire match. I hate the cooldown mechanic of cloak. You just happened to be the person one taking advantage of the cloak in the video.
But since you brought it up, we can explore it. I mean, seriously you don't need a lot of health when the enemy can't see you and you essentially OHK them in the back. It isn't like you intended on having gun fights. It also may not be fair to say that they didn't have their eyes open because you were hiding behnd the objective and popped out when they were hacking objectives and recloaked and hid again. Other times you stood still where they wouldn't have seen a shimmer. And there was a time where you hid behind the barriers on A which I didn't even know you could do :).
But I reiterate, this wasn't about you but how often one can remain cloaked for an entire game. The cooldown mechanic on the cloak is a joke.
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3249
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 09:01:00 -
[7] - Quote
CUSE TOWN333 wrote:you have to put one full ewar caldari scan scout in your squad so the rest of your squad can see them on the radar
With the stacking penalties, I don't think that you can pick up a deepened, damped and cloaked scout.
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3249
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 12:12:00 -
[8] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote: There was a point where they were looking for the guy lol and couldn't find him because he stood still between the opening on the objective. At one point, he even went behind boundaries...no way could they have spotted him back there.
Moody's running around a quarter of your nearest Heavy's HP and has a lifespan less than a half second when spotted. Being tough to see is the point; you can't possibly expect him to fight toe-to-toe. Plus you're totally wrong ... RND could've shut him down with a single GalLogi or CalScout.
First of all...what does RND have to do with this?
Secondly, I don't expect him to fight toe-to-toe. I wouldn't fight toe to toe vs a heavy with a 700hp assault suit.
I don't feel like anyone is actually reading. What do you think my point is in this thread?
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3249
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 12:19:00 -
[9] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:
Cloak is fine. These tears are the joke.
Cloakheads..smh
What I do find funny about guys protecting the cloak is that you would say that all you have to do is look and that they are easy to spot. If they're so easy to spot, you would have to be an idiot to use it. I mean, why fit something that's ineffective? Especially something that uses up so much pg/cpu.
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3249
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 12:30:00 -
[10] - Quote
ODoCyrius Li-Moody wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Cyrius Li-Moody wrote:Thank you. Thank you very much. I'm an assassin, doing what an assassin does best.
QQ Min scouts. QQ knives. QQ the fact that they could have countered me if they put on the right fit or actually kept their eyes open. Oh wait every Cal scout is a slayer scout that doesn't run precision. QQ my 400 hp and terrible regen. QQ me having to use 4 slots and an adv main weapon so I can hide from idiots.
Hilarious thread considering how many gal shotgunners exist with double my eHP.
"abuse" hahahahahahahahhahaa
ps- Have a like. +1 If you read my post, you'll notice that I wrote that it wasn't a dig at you. It's a dig at how ridiculous the cloak is. You can practically be invisible for the entire match. I hate the cooldown mechanic of cloak. You just happened to be the person one taking advantage of the cloak in the video. But since you brought it up, we can explore it. I mean, seriously you don't need a lot of health when the enemy can't see you and you essentially OHK them in the back. It isn't like you intended on having gun fights. It also may not be fair to say that they didn't have their eyes open because you were hiding behnd the objective and popped out when they were hacking objectives and recloaked and hid again. Other times you stood still where they wouldn't have seen a shimmer. And there was a time where you hid behind the barriers on A which I didn't even know you could do :). But I reiterate, this wasn't about you but how often one can remain cloaked for an entire game. The cooldown mechanic on the cloak is a joke. No, it was a dig at me for playing me role as well. I have been a scout for over a year. I've knifed you plenty of times before cloaks existed. I've known how to survive on the battlefield before the stupid mechanic existed. There are many many places I can go that people probably have no idea that you can go. We used to have to be invisible without the cloak. Trust me if this stupid cloak never existed I'd be pretty happy because I'd have less pathetic excuse for scouts in my role. And you're right, I had no intention of getting in 1v1 gunfights because I don't need to. Being a scout isn't about announcing your presence and honor 1v1ing. It's about cunning, positioning, movement, and most importantly ASSASSINATION. You see me when I want you to see me. What you see is a Min scout playing the role as intended. I really want to say quit crying and run the proper fit but people won't. They'll cry instead of running counters because they want to be slayers instead of scouts.
It wasn't a dig at you lol.....you're just taking it personal. I didn't even say anything other than cloaks being able to allow players to be more invisible than visible for a match. Which is a stupid mechanic to have for competitive matches.
And cut that whole knifing me "plenty of times" jive out. I've rarely been nova knived in my dust career. I'm not saying it is really hard to knife me but it's just something that hasn't happened to me like that. If you knifed me plenty of times, I would have remembered you....and I've only come to know of you in OH, post cloak era.
Edit: and that might be what scout means to you but being a scout is supposed to be about recon. But players do what they see fit. And this isn't about scouts...this is about cloaks. You guys are trying to twist and turn **** for whatever personal reasons. But the bottom line is, this is about cloaks and the ability to be invisible for long periods of time. The cloak cooldown should act like vehicle module cooldowns. Once you activate and deactivate, you should wait some time before you can use it again. Otherwise it gets spammed like you've shown in the video.
> Check RND out here
|
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3249
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 12:42:00 -
[11] - Quote
Cyrius Li-Moody wrote:Oh I am taking it personally. You don't direct link my content and complain about my playstyle without me taking it personally.
I've knifed you plenty of times. Just because you don't remember it doesn't mean it hasn't happened. You used to run around in your cute little proto Min Logi in pubs quite often.
Run fits to counter fits. Stop complaining.
"Plenty of times" means that I would have remembered. Getting nova knifed isn't like getting shot with an AR. You knew my min logi suit..congrats. You're better off saying that you shot me plenty of times.....nova knived? You're just lying now
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3249
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 13:08:00 -
[12] - Quote
Cyrius Li-Moody wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Cyrius Li-Moody wrote:Oh I am taking it personally. You don't direct link my content and complain about my playstyle without me taking it personally.
I've knifed you plenty of times. Just because you don't remember it doesn't mean it hasn't happened. You used to run around in your cute little proto Min Logi in pubs quite often.
Run fits to counter fits. Stop complaining. "Plenty of times" means that I would have remembered. Getting nova knifed isn't like getting shot with an AR. You knew my min logi suit..congrats. You're better off saying that you shot me plenty of times.....nova knived? You're just lying now Whatever keeps your ego intact.
I shall actually say the same to you.
Edit: the fact that you knew my suit probably means that you've been on the wrong end of my gun more often times than not.
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3250
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 15:26:00 -
[13] - Quote
hfderrtgvcd wrote:To all the people saying run counter fits ad use precision enhancers, moody is using three proto profile damps and a proto cloak. He is unscannable with that fit. However, I don't think there was anything wrong about his playstyle. The majority of his nova knife kills were people hacking and people not checking their six. His fit is slow, has low health, and is terrible in 1v1s. The only problem I see is that it is too easy to just stand still in the open and wait for people to turn around.
I was also saying that as well....you can't counter that fit with precision enhancers. You won't be able to pick it up.
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3250
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 15:29:00 -
[14] - Quote
Leadfoot10 wrote:hfderrtgvcd wrote:To all the people saying run counter fits ad use precision enhancers, moody is using three proto profile damps and a proto cloak. He is unscannable with that fit. Are you sure? I believe the only unscannable suit in the game is a cloaked 4 profile dampened Gal Scout and everything else is caught with 3 precision enhanced Cal Scout.
There is no fit that can pick up a cloaked gal scout with 1 profile dampener. I tested it with a friend in FW. The moment he cloaked, I could no longer pick him up with 4 precision enhancers on my cal proto suit!
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3250
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 15:34:00 -
[15] - Quote
Cyrius Li-Moody wrote:I can be scanned the second I step out of my cloak. Also I don't care if I've been killed by you which has happened. That doesn't bother me and I'm not at all bothered to admit it. Who the hell cares? I don't have such a strong ego that I deny getting killed.
I don't have an ego dude......I just don't like to be lied on. I have over 10K deaths, you could have killed me before. But when one boasts about nova knifing me plenty of times, that's absurd. Because I haven't been nova knived "plenty of times" in my entire dust career. It is a rare occurrence.
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3250
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 15:44:00 -
[16] - Quote
IKnight Soiaire wrote:Cloak is not fine, its just ridiculous and ignorant to say something like that, the first nerf to the Cloak was a step in the right direction, but what would completely balance it is to force the player to manually deactivate the cloak before switching weapons, then all will be well in 'Competitive' land.
Until then the Cloak is not fine. Everything else about it is fine, the visibility (Honestly, there were moments in this video where I face desked at the stupidity of some of ERA's 'A-Team' players, even when standing still a Cloak is easy enough to spot for an experienced player, and even then, you get a red crosshair when you move over one)
The only thing that I can think of is probably that they were engaged elsewhere. If they can't see a body clearly or it pops up on the map, they wouldn't notice him there.
Especially, in a pc match...you don't have time to properly scan an area with your crosshairs. You have to move it slowly in order to know exactly where to shoot. In a pc match, it isn't really practical.
Even espeon who has good situational awareness and donned a cal scout didn't see him at the end of the bridge.
I remember playing a pub and this guy cloaked and ran into a corner. I couldn't find him for ****. So, I just waited around until his **** ran out and deactivated. He probably thought I wouldn't wait but fugg that. It isn't as easy to see....and I don't have much issue with that. But how it can easily be spammed is an issue.
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3250
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 15:50:00 -
[17] - Quote
DsAdipem Nothi wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:hfderrtgvcd wrote:To all the people saying run counter fits ad use precision enhancers, moody is using three proto profile damps and a proto cloak. He is unscannable with that fit. Are you sure? I believe the only unscannable suit in the game is a cloaked 4 profile dampened Gal Scout and everything else is caught with 3 precision enhanced Cal Scout. There is no fit that can pick up a cloaked gal scout with 1 profile dampener. I tested it with a friend in FW. The moment he cloaked, I could no longer pick him up with 4 precision enhancers on my cal proto suit! Wow that math is bad. 27 dB - Max Skilled GalScout 20 dB - Max Skilled GalScout + Cmp Profile Dampener 18 dB - Max Skilled GalScout + Cmp Profile Dampener + Proto Cloak (on) ^ There is no magic here; anything that scans at or below 18 dB will pick this guy up. Pro Tip: Lots of things can scan at or below 18 dB.
I don't care what your math says lol. I tested it in the field myself and it doesn't pick it up!!
Demzor ran min scouts and told me I couldn't pick him up if he had damps. I called him a liar cause the math said I could. So, I got a gal scout with max everything and we went into FW and I could not pick him up with 4 precision enhancers on my maxed cal scout. And all he had was one dampener and a cloak. Once he cloaked, he would not be picked up.
This was before they changed the profile sig of the cloak, however. But I doubt much changed..especially since I was using, and I repeat, 4 precison enhancers.
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3250
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 16:07:00 -
[18] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote: I don't care what your math says lol. I tested it in the field myself and it doesn't pick it up!!
Demzor ran min scouts and told me I couldn't pick him up if he had damps. I called him a liar cause the math said I could. So, I got a gal scout with max everything and we went into FW and I could not pick him up with 4 precision enhancers on my maxed cal scout. And all he had was one dampener and a cloak. Once he cloaked, he would not be picked up.
This was before they changed the profile sig of the cloak, however. But I doubt much changed..especially since I was using, and I repeat, 4 precison enhancers.
Your findings are outdated. Cloaks' active dampening bonus was nerfed in Alpha from 25% to a maximum of 10%. Your max-skill CalScout needs only two cPEs to pick up the GalScout in your scenario. Huge respect for Demzor, btw. He's one of the best; same goes for Assert Dominance.
****.....didn't know all of the changes. I'm seeing now (in game) that the gal bonus is now 15%. Well, I'm going to have to test it again somehow then.
But prior to the nerf, 4 precision enhancers wasn't picking up a cloaked gal scout with one dampener. Maybe it was a bug or maybe the stacking penalties negated everything above 2 enhancers. Cause the dropsuit profile was 35 compared to 40 precision. The damp module was 25% compared to 20% for precision mods plus the cloak had 25%.
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3250
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 16:13:00 -
[19] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:How about some cloak fixes?
I bet they could implement some sort of "shimmer" when the cloaked person moves, then they wouldn't be so invisible.
AND
They could make your recticle turn red when it passes over that spot that is more blurry than the rest of the screen.
I bet that would help.
*end sarcasm*
Some people should learn how to be at least, slightly below average (as opposed to being in the bottom 5th percentile) before trying to insult others about conquering game mechanics.
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3252
|
Posted - 2014.07.14 18:53:00 -
[20] - Quote
CHANCEtheChAn wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfW4XBP7A7cNow, OH played a good game but I'm curious to know if this is what CCP envisioned? Is it ok that players are invisible longer than they are visible and in a competitive match? Only popping out just to OHK you? If this isn't evidence that the cloak needs to have the same cooldown mechanic as every other module (with a cooldown) in the game, then there is nothing else you can do. This isn't a dig at the player that's abusing the mechanic either.....this is a dig at cloaking in dust and how crazy it is. Honestly Y dubbs, this is a very very poor excuse of an example video Moody has been running min scout for over a year And Nova knives for longer 95% of scouts do not use Nova knives, and even of that, 85% of scouts do not run min scout that get a bonus to them If he had been basically any other cloaked scout, it wwould have taken him 4-8 seconds to kill those heavies and scout on the bridge with a shotgun, in which time he would have died easily On the flip side, if he had been using any other sidearm/primary it might have been longer and he would have been mowed down He used a niche weapon, in a niche suit, with niche modules Not many people can run around with 400 health and still go 17-7 By being as invisible as he was with a proto cloak and 3/2 damps, Moody is sacrificing hundreds of CPU/PG just to be invisible He is effectively losing a proto weapon, proto grenades, and sacrificing 400+ armor/ hacking ability/ run ability to make this fit work If he is running E war to evade everyone, why shouldn't he be able to evade, well, everyone? The cloak give many negative benefits to counter the positives Such as not being able to hear anything around you (Moody cloaked up behind the point at A and died to an orbital because he did not hear it drop), its useless if you don't have the damps to back it up, and the high CPU/PG limits your whole suit Anything below a proto cloak is basically trash, so Moody is sacrificing elsewhere to use the very best cloack there is, so why not be able to cloak up and cloak out repeatedly? If it was advanced or basic cloak, yes I would understand the QQ But fitting a proto and QQing? Eh
You guys are making this about Moody and minmatar scouts, etc. The issue is with the cloak and the cloak only. Players shouldn't be able to be invisible like that for an entire match. There should be a an immediate cooldown each time you use the cloak.
Imagine the scanner without a cooldown time? Last build we all abused the scanner and spamming it constantly. The cloak needs the same cooldown mechanic.
> Check RND out here
|
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3259
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 12:08:00 -
[21] - Quote
CUSE TOWN333 wrote:i think the problem stems from a good player in a invisible damp scout suit is kind of OP. no one is complaining about cloaked scrub scouts. but i know the day i seen lightning in a pub when the cloak first came out i said to myself this will be a scary FOTM a good slayer thats invisible.
Man.....this is so not about Moody. Everyone keeps making it about moody. It is just his video but it could have been anyone. The issue is the ablity to be invisible for the whole game that the cloak allows.
Ahhh forget it...the thread went south anyway lol
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3264
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 18:02:00 -
[22] - Quote
Cenex Langly wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfW4XBP7A7cNow, OH played a good game but I'm curious to know if this is what CCP envisioned? Is it ok that players are invisible longer than they are visible and in a competitive match? Only popping out just to OHK you? If this isn't evidence that the cloak needs to have the same cooldown mechanic as every other module (with a cooldown) in the game, then there is nothing else you can do. This isn't a dig at the player that's abusing the mechanic either.....this is a dig at cloaking in dust and how crazy it is. LOL You mad? But seriously. Don't blame your loss on the cloak. It's a ****** game mechanic that wasn't well thought out. It needs to have a delay in the decloak so that the player doesn't just shoot and you have no idea where it came from. I'm sick of that as well. There is no counter to a guy with a cloak and 3 profile dampeners. In EVE there are always counters, but in DUST there are just ... well none. You need a cloaking delay before you can perform a task like shooting. Something like a 3 second delay. These guys that can get in shoot then cloak back up before you even know what happened... well that's just not fun at all. But yeah. I'm only saying that because I agree cloak is broken. OH would have murdered your corp regardless of cloak so don't complain about that.
What the **** are you talking about? That wasn't RND in the video, you mindless geek.
> Check RND out here
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3264
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 18:16:00 -
[23] - Quote
Jathniel wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfW4XBP7A7cNow, OH played a good game but I'm curious to know if this is what CCP envisioned? Is it ok that players are invisible longer than they are visible and in a competitive match? Only popping out just to OHK you? If this isn't evidence that the cloak needs to have the same cooldown mechanic as every other module (with a cooldown) in the game, then there is nothing else you can do. This isn't a dig at the player that's abusing the mechanic either.....this is a dig at cloaking in dust and how crazy it is. Sorry, man. I usually agree with you, but in this case, I think the cloak worked fine. If you want to add a cooldown mechanic, I can only accept it if cloaks are given 100% invisibility, including immunity to line-of-sight scanning. Also, he didn't get non-stop OHK, and he died more often than not. Literally, nearly half of his engagements got him killed. So it's not like the operation of the cloak makes someone invincible.
Again, this isn't about critiquing Moody's gameplay.....but he went 17-7, so he didn't die more often than not. 7 deaths in a competitive pc match is pretty good.
I didn't count his kills but in the beginning he was holding A by cloaking and OHK the enemy. He had a nice kill streak in the beginning. You only die when you engage, so yeah....but he still killed at least 2x more than he died.
But back on topic....if they gave 100% invisibility for the proposed cooldown mechanic, i'd be ok wth it. It would be sillyy to do so but I'd give in
> Check RND out here
|
|
|
|