Missilistic turrets have infinite range.

like you dint nerf tanks enough.....do you even play the game or do u stare at charts all day?

Good because ADS is intolerable on the battleifeld. Once you hit an incubus with one shot, they activate the afterburner and is out of there with their double or triple armor reppers. Same could be said about pythons. Swarms can't touch..neither can tank rails since the distance nerf. All ADS pilots do is go high and drop behind the tank....and if they have a gunner, good luck.

1. Installations should receive a significant buff in ehp, but not in the order of magnitude of a supply depot or CRU. Right now I wouldn't mind if the ehp of installations was doubled.
2. If you want to see people try to repair installations while they are under attack, consider granting them passive resists to all relevant damage types. This way a Logi with a rep-tool has a better chance of standing up to the DPS of a railgun turret. Just make sure an installation doesn't turn invulnerable when maintained by a single player.
Fyi: The highest repair rate on an installation achievable is 151 hp/s (core focused rep tool repairs 121 hp/s on installations, +25% Minmatar Logi bonus).
A single IAFG sits at ~450 dps including reloads (1500 hp * 4 / (3*4s*0.75 + 4s) )
3. In a dream world I think installations should respawn a while after they have been destroyed. Just to keep installations as a factor during the whole match.
4. Finally, please make sure that WP for neutral turrets is removed. It's overdue.

I think you'll find it takes a railgun tank 4 shots to destroy an installation, whereas an installation still deals original "UNNERFED" damage to tanks. If a tank is in a battle, a railgun installation will definitely turn the tide.

The missile installation can successfully deter ADS and hot drop pilots all day.
The blaster is a good suppression turret and can annihilate infantry and LAVs as well as dropships in the right hands.

Buffing the HP of installations would result in more people camping in them, even people repping them.

This would make the game slower paced, more frustrating and "campy"

The missile installations are essentially the old large missiles- very long range, but it doesn't really matter because the damage is laughable.

One...I wasn't responding to your statement about ADS. Second...I don't think you play the game much if you think you can "quite comfortably" kill a decent ADS pilot.

I think the reason that Supply Depots and CRUs have lower wp rewards is to discourage their destruction... just a thought.

If installations are buffed, they should have to reload like a normal turret, have the same number of shots per mag/clip every reload as a normal turret, and can retain infinite ammo capacity.

Hmm... I wonder if installations could act as ammo caches, but only when the turret type matches the ones in use of the vehicle.
This would increase their significance substantially... it would make you think twice before destroying them.

I wouldn't be opposed to players being able to buy installations. This would let CCP make new ones, both bigger and smaller. CRU's are really expensive, Large Blaster installations are expensive, Supply Depots less expensive, etc.

I agree with this one. Sure the wp are nice but it takes as much as 10 seconds and as little as what 5? to hack these so they can flip flop a LOT and be a real problem for tanks. There really aren't enough players on a map in most cases to have players guarding the turrets so as a part time tanker i normally destroy every turret i see so that it doesn't get flipped and blow up my tank.
I would be perfectly happy if they were just pulled off the maps in all honesty. Better though would be if they were in more strategic positions such as clustering the CRU Supply depot and say 2 turrets so there would be a good reason to defend the area.

it takes us 2 cycles of XT-1 turret +10% already to blow one up one more do you want,

I propose that we remove option to hack them, and bound them to team that holds null-cannon in they closest proximity - if someone will start the process of hacking null-cannon, defense system of installations is disable temporarily, as soon as hack is finish all installations is switching to defend that n-c. It will annihilate problem of unexpected silent-killers, and at the same point will make job of gunner more safe(because no one will come to hack it).

One more thing, there shouldn't be neutral installation at beginning of match. They should appear after n-c is hacked.

Damage: Rewrite of the internet? didn't write an essay last time i checked, simply mentioned it.

Missiles: Often a struggling dropship will shrug off swarms just to be killed by a missile from a turret used by some noob in the redline 500m away. Not pretty when each one costs 500,000 isk. Imagine if the game had inbuilt remotes on your spawn, how would you feel?

Blasters: DO you even play the game?! blasters are still largely effective anti infantry weapons.

Camping: Shotgunners? Scouts? Last time i checked shotgunners don't tend to run 100m into the redline for a laugh and back out.

Slower pace: Dropships used for infantry transport? HOW ABSURD! do you even play in squads? Oh and show us where on your clone the bad proto touched you.

Do we really need free installations that are able to kill 500,000 dropships and 350000 tanks with ease?
Already a tank or dropship on low hp can be killed by any turret. Have you ever hovered a dropship where it can be shot by a blaster turret? It melts

Since these installations are free they should serve as they do...

Turrets not doomsday devices

I can already climb into a turret and easily kill tanks and people alike. All the turrets hve their roles and are in a good place