|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Killar-12
The Exemplars Top Men.
2894
|
Posted - 2014.07.01 16:25:00 -
[1] - Quote
Takahashi Kashuken wrote:Wont happen
None of the candidate use vehicles and those that do are mostly terrible and dont even do PC
They may use vehicles in pubs but thats pubs, you balance for PC and currently yet again vehicles are useless in PC
CPM0 got tiercide for vehicles and now vehicles are even worse off that before 1.0
Less modules/hulls/turrets/skills and still infantry complain, not even allowed in ambush and still infantry complain, judge a CPM candidate complains about rails on a regular basis and cried when vehicles were still in OMS and backs out of every game with competant AV/Vehicle users against him
There is no point, the game is run for infantry, vehicles are again a joke and are useless, you cant even use blasters to defend yourself since you have the accuracy of a blind archer and are better off jumping out with a AR or a HMG and the kicker is you have more range
Wasting your time OP, a vote for CPM is a vote for CCP anyways Zatara Doesn't do PC? Mkay... Reason #108 that Mr. Kashuken is a numnut
21-Day EVE Trial
|
Killar-12
The Exemplars Top Men.
2900
|
Posted - 2014.07.02 08:13:00 -
[2] - Quote
Takahashi Kashuken wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:Takahashi Kashuken wrote:Wont happen
None of the candidate use vehicles and those that do are mostly terrible and dont even do PC
They may use vehicles in pubs but thats pubs, you balance for PC and currently yet again vehicles are useless in PC
Well I have all vehicle support skills to V, all proto large turrets, I think 2 proto small turrets, and I was in a PC match less than 24 hours ago...so...you're wrong? You fall under the terrible pilot catagory and are a non factor To be honest you weren't that good, I'd of taken Char, Bob, or Mavado any day over you.
21-Day EVE Trial
|
Killar-12
The Exemplars Top Men.
2901
|
Posted - 2014.07.02 17:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
DontChimpOut wrote:Killar-12 wrote:Takahashi Kashuken wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:Takahashi Kashuken wrote:Wont happen
None of the candidate use vehicles and those that do are mostly terrible and dont even do PC
They may use vehicles in pubs but thats pubs, you balance for PC and currently yet again vehicles are useless in PC
Well I have all vehicle support skills to V, all proto large turrets, I think 2 proto small turrets, and I was in a PC match less than 24 hours ago...so...you're wrong? You fall under the terrible pilot catagory and are a non factor To be honest you weren't that good, I'd of taken Char, Bob, or Mavado any day over you. Based on what? Experience with all 4 parties, also as a bonus the other 3 are FUN to play with
21-Day EVE Trial
|
Killar-12
The Exemplars Top Men.
2901
|
Posted - 2014.07.02 17:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
DontChimpOut wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:Takahashi Kashuken wrote:Wont happen
None of the candidate use vehicles and those that do are mostly terrible and dont even do PC
They may use vehicles in pubs but thats pubs, you balance for PC and currently yet again vehicles are useless in PC
Well I have all vehicle support skills to V, all proto large turrets, I think 2 proto small turrets, and I was in a PC match less than 24 hours ago...so...you're wrong? You can have access to all you want, doesn't make you a tanker. Atiim tries to make the same argument. He says he has access to most modules and turrets with skills from 3-5, yet he chooses AV, whereas a rail is mounted on a tank with greater speed and maneuverability, higher base HP, and more consistent damage output. If someone constantly chooses gear that's worse at the job, when they have access to much better gear better suited for destroying tanks, then there's not a problem with the tank itself. It's his own decision to nerf his capabilities, making his argument nearly invalid. So AV should be buffed due to the fact that it is less effective than vs tanks?
21-Day EVE Trial
|
Killar-12
The Exemplars Top Men.
2901
|
Posted - 2014.07.02 20:24:00 -
[5] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:First specced into vehicles in the E3 build of closed beta and have been doing it every build and update ever since. So that's...what, 2+ years of constant use? Or is early closed beta through today not enough experience?
Do I use vehicles 100% of the time? No, I actually like running infantry in pub matches about 80% of the time, but I've run nothing BUT vehicles in PC save exactly one match where I as asked to come in as backup infantry.
My experience in PC? Launched into PC on the first day of its release, I think we had 20+ battles that day. In the first month I was involved in well over 150 PC battles before things started to slow down. Is it 10-15 battles a day? No not quite that many, but to think I'm "twiddling my thumbs" is completely off base. Are things as active in PC right now? Now, things are far docile but that's the nature of MH right now.
Am I the most amazing pilot ever? No, I have my good matches and I have my bad matches and I usually come out with a solid KDR for vehicle kills, but to sit and imply that I'm "irrelevant" in my understanding of mechanics is simply ignorant.
EDIT: And Killar, last time we played together which was like the only time, I was in a Commando, not a tank. Not really sure where you're getting your personal experience from? Not going after you, Just Takiro Buzzkillington
21-Day EVE Trial
|
|
|
|