|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Atiim
NoGameNoLife
9739
   |
Posted - 2014.06.22 23:53:00 -
[1] - Quote
LLAVs would go quite nicely with the HP/s nerf of Armor Repairers, as it would create an incentive to use teamwork, and would serve as a true Support Vehicle.
I want SLAVs back, as their high-speed not only made them ideal for transport when you need to break past enemy lines, but it was also a fun thing to use in races. The LDSs should be re-introduced because it would be the ideal gunship for those who want to support Infantry troops.
It should also be noted that these items still exist in this game.
"Many things in life are subjective, morality is one of them..."
-HAND
|
Atiim
NoGameNoLife
9740
|
Posted - 2014.06.23 00:08:00 -
[2] - Quote
Takahashi Kashuken wrote:
But you wanted this
That's a strawman fallacy, but good attempt at trolling.
Takahashi Kashuken wrote:You wanted vehicles to be nerfed until they became nothing but useless again
You cried and cried and cried until we had less vehicles, modules, skills and even then it wasnt enough and look at what we have now
Link a quote of me asking for vehicles to be nerfed before these variants were removed or this is not only fallacious drivel, but the ramblings of a drunkard trying to find a scapegoat as well.
"Many things in life are subjective, morality is one of them..."
-HAND
|
Atiim
NoGameNoLife
9743
|
Posted - 2014.06.23 00:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Atiim wrote:
I want SLAVEs back, as their high-efficiency not only made them ideal for menial labour when you need a break in the afternoon, but it was also a fun thing to use the lesser races. The Low Down Slavess should be re-introduced because the would be the ideal workforce for those who want to support Imperial troops.
It should also be noted that these prodicts still exist in this game.
We'll make a fine Imperial out of you yet Atiim!
*Sigh*
While your determination is admirable, I'm going to decline your offer... again... for like the 5th time.
I want SLAVs, not SLAVEs.
"Many things in life are subjective, morality is one of them..."
-HAND
|
Atiim
NoGameNoLife
9743
|
Posted - 2014.06.23 00:20:00 -
[4] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:I say no because what's the use when they will just be complained about and nerfed into nothing anyway by the community?
Again, another situation where community cried nerf and then changes their mind later on, completely forgetting that they brought about the change in the first place.
I know your hell-bent on bashing the community, but could you put something other than lies and drivel while doing so?
Nobody asked for those vehicles removed, it was actually CCP's decision. Heck, I remember people crying to keep them in the game. Why else do you think ADSs are still here?
I want SLAVs, not SLAVEs.
"Many things in life are subjective, morality is one of them..."
-HAND
|
Atiim
NoGameNoLife
9743
|
Posted - 2014.06.23 00:31:00 -
[5] - Quote
Vulpes Dolosus wrote:I do not want Logistic vehicles without proper and viable logistic modules and/or turrets to make them actual support vehicles. Not just tankier versions of STD frames.
I'd like a return of the Shield/Armor Transporters, as well as a "Nanohive Module" that would re-supply vehicles with ammunition..
Not only is that good for content creation and encourages teamwork, it solves the issue of Supply Depots being inaccessible to vehicles as well.
I want SLAVs, not SLAVEs.
"Many things in life are subjective, morality is one of them..."
-HAND
|
Atiim
NoGameNoLife
9760
|
Posted - 2014.06.23 05:53:00 -
[6] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:Atiim wrote:Michael Arck wrote:I say no because what's the use when they will just be complained about and nerfed into nothing anyway by the community?
Again, another situation where community cried nerf and then changes their mind later on, completely forgetting that they brought about the change in the first place.
I know your hell-bent on bashing the community, but could you put something other than lies and drivel while doing so? Nobody asked for those vehicles removed, it was actually CCP's decision. Heck, I remember people crying to keep them in the game. Why else do you think ADSs are still here? Oh shut up Atiim. Did I say that the community wanted the vehicles removed? No I didn't brainchild. What I said was, the community will eventually want it removed like so many other things that have been in place. It's not about bashing the community. It's telling it like it is. I'm not the only one who sees that this has happened.
Your assigning blame to the community for their removal, so implicitly yes you are stating that. Perhaps you should actually read what you write for one. The only thing l I see happening here is someone making sad attempts at attacking the community, but failing due to a lack of merit and statements hold any credibility.
I'm "telling it like it is" as well.
I want SLAVs, not SLAVEs.
"Many things in life are subjective, morality is one of them..."
-HAND
|
Atiim
NoGameNoLife
9760
|
Posted - 2014.06.23 06:48:00 -
[7] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:
Sigh. Again, shut up boy.
That's the best you've got?
Surely someone as calm, collected, and intelelgent as you could come up with something better than that right?
Michael Arck wrote:I wish I could punch you in the nose.
So do a lot of people in this game.
Does this mean I get to put you to the scrapbook? 
I want SLAVs, not SLAVEs.
"Many things in life are subjective, morality is one of them..."
-HAND
|
Atiim
11772
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 06:14:00 -
[8] - Quote
843-Vika wrote:
But at the same time it should never take 1 AV player to destroy a tank.
Then why would I even bother speccing into AV as opposed to a tank?
DUST 514's 1st Matari Commando
-HAND
|
Atiim
11789
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 17:19:00 -
[9] - Quote
843-Vika wrote:Atiim wrote:843-Vika wrote:
But at the same time it should never take 1 AV player to destroy a tank.
Then why would I even bother speccing into AV as opposed to a tank? You seriously believe 1 av player should be able solo a tank? That is the most self centered thing I have ever heard. It should never take a single av player to take out a tank, 2 is the minimum that should be required depending on the build of the tank. This is not cod where you can use a single MAWW Rocket to take out a battlehind.
And what you just said is the most hypocritical thing I've ever heard. You say that one player with AV shouldn't be able to solo a vehicles, yet a single player in a vehicle can solo Infantry units.
But, on the off-hand chance that you're not a hypocrite and have the mind of Spkr4TheDead, I'll assume the inverse on your ideals must also be true, meaning that you don't think vehicles should be able to solo either.
Would that be accurate?
DUST 514's 1st Matari Commando
-HAND
|
|
|
| |
|