DUST Search - What is wrong with FoTM?

All Channels

General Discussions

What is wrong with FoTM?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Eko Sol Strange Playings 402	Posted - 2014.05.29 21:08:00 - [1] - Quote You know, I just don't think there is anything wrong with FoTM methods. I have my complaints about aspects of the game. I think all scouts should lose an equipment slot. I retract my complaint about the scrubs who snipe from the top of the MCC. I want them to fix bugs. All of that being said. A bunch of cloaked scouts with shotguns isn't an issue. Outside of some bugs, it's fine. I think there might be some balance issue with Heavies but that's about it. I don't even think it's bad. I run ADV Heavy sometimes. I run Shotgun and ACR Cloaked Scout. I run Cloaked AV Scout (RE's and AV Nades). I run G-Assault with AR (BTW, it's sick. The 5% bonus per point makes the AR just plain Sick). I run a MLT Min Heavy with a MLT Armor Rep and a MLT Damage mod and a Rail Rifle. I run ADV and partial PROTO Amarr-Logi as well. I started 30 days before 1.7. I wasted all of my skill points in the AR and then it got nerfed in 1.7. I went to RR next. I had SP limitations and someone said don't do Scrambler Rifle so I just randomly picked RR. I ran ARR until 1.8. In 1.8, my ARR was losing to the ACR 1v1 way to often to make it viable. Now I run ACR. The problem is, as vets play, they will have skilled proto with at least 3 prof in multiple weapons. So whenever one of those weapons becomes viable again, a vet is able to pick it back up. At 22mil SP, I'm starting to hit that wall. And before someone says "try x and see how good you are" just know I MLT forge snipe with 0 points in FG as well. I challenge myself and do silly things like any other player. BTW, I also have ran the Flaylock side arm for about 4 months straight. I only run SMG on my Swarm Fit and FG Fit. Again, What is wrong with FoTM? Why is that even a saying? Shouldn't FoTM just be "Best Set Ups Available Now" as opposed to some condescending statement? Is it wrong to use the mathematically best gear and set ups in addition to skill so I can win? PSN is "Ekopalm" I play D3, Child of Light, and solo games Also, Proto Trolling until I'm broke...
One Eyed King Land of the BIind 1703	Posted - 2014.05.29 21:26:00 - [2] - Quote You are right. There is nothing wrong with using broken mechanics to "win" inherently meaningless battles others just want to have fun in. I am sure this kind of thing didn't lead to a great many people quitting the game before they even had the chance to see its strong points. But you go on ahead and keep doing what you are doing and needing to win at all costs, because then we will all know that you are consequently a superior human being to everyone else. "I've made a huge mistake." -G.O.B. Bluth
Nothing Certain Bioshock Rejects 775	Posted - 2014.05.29 21:51:00 - [3] - Quote One Eyed King wrote: You are right. There is nothing wrong with using broken mechanics to "win" inherently meaningless battles others just want to have fun in. I am sure this kind of thing didn't lead to a great many people quitting the game before they even had the chance to see its strong points. But you go on ahead and keep doing what you are doing and needing to win at all costs, because then we will all know that you are consequently a superior human being to everyone else. Your disgust is understandable but misplaced. Running FOTM is not inherently bad and specializing in one role and completely maxing it out leads to greater discrepancy than mixing it up. One of the fun things about this game, probably unintentional, is that the game is constantly changing. What works one build doesn't work in the next. Its not the FOTM that causes the problem, it is the matchmaking and the fact that vets can immediately go protoish in the new fotm while newer players have to start from scratch. That wouldn't be better though if vets stuck more to a few maxed out roles rather than fotm though. Because, that's why.
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui The Honor of the Fallen Biomassed. 806	Posted - 2014.05.29 21:55:00 - [4] - Quote Excuse the interruption but can anyone tell me how to file a help ticket ? Stop Tact Striking and come and get this Null Cannon with your GUNS you scrubs .
Vulpes Dolosus Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1611	Posted - 2014.05.29 21:58:00 - [5] - Quote Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Excuse the interruption but can anyone tell me how to file a help ticket ? http://dust514.com/user/help-tickets/ From the front page > Community > Support > Submit Ticket
Joseph Ridgeson WarRavens Final Resolution. 1935	Posted - 2014.05.29 22:01:00 - [6] - Quote Assault/Plasma Rifle was not nerfed in 1.7; just that far better weapons were added. For every other patch in Uprising, that is when the Assault/Plasma Rifle was nerfed. Anyway, the problem is that FoTM is used to describe several things in this game compared to every other game I have played that has had a FoTM. Allow me to explain: 1. Most people will state "this is FoTM" has another way to say "this is too powerful." The problem is that not everyone means FoTM (Flavor/Fit of the Month; I prefer Flavor) as being too powerful. In other games that have a clear FoTM such as League of Legends or World of Warcraft, it might not even be the fact that something is too powerful that is causing people to go there; it just means it is popular. In League, when a champion is picked on a stream or in a tournament that has people saying "why was that picked?!" and the game goes well, it may cause a renewed interest in that champion. In the early days, Dyrus playing Singed when he was considered "barely decent" caused him to be in every game. So if you have two people, one saying "Flavor of the Month is just popular, for whatever reason" and another saying "Flavor of the Month means overpowered", you have a disconnect in communication. 2. My concern is that Flavor of the Month can make a game boring. League of Legends and DUST offers a huge amount of choice, more than a lot of other games. Between fitting, suits, champions, rune pages, masteries, and skill points there are a lot of different ways to run a character. The problem is that if something becomes FoTM, whether because it is simply the best option or just being popular, it makes the game more stagnant. One of the advantages that something like DUST has over Titan is the level of customization beyond just "10 primary weapons, 4 sidearms, 1 augmentation to each weapon, choice 2 perks from a pool of 10." That level of customization means NOTHING if there are only a few things that are used. 3. FoTM may become just how the developers begin to create the game. Jump to Season 1 League of Legends. No one has figured out "the best way" to play. You have a lot of different things happening, some successful, some not. People discover "hey, if we put the ADC with a Support and give the Support ZERO gold from kills, get items that give passive gold, and turn those items into cheap things that give an aura boost in a team, that is great!" So that is what supports did; Philosopher's Stone, Heart of Gold, Aegis of the Legion, Reverie, Randuin's Omen. Every game, always the same. Well, people figured something else out: "if we have no one else buy wards and ONLY the Support, we can save everyone a huge amount of gold!" Riot decides to add an Item that gives Free Wards to facilitate making it easier for Supports to be ward monkeys. Enter Season 3. Supports build: Sightstone, boots, Ruby Sightstone, boots of mobility, and the rest of the income was spent solely on more wards and items to let you see the other people's wards. Boring as all hell. The developers help push the game into that direction because of how people were playing. The Flavor of the Month becomes the complete metagame. The game became stagnant as hell. Going with your statement of: "Is it wrong to use the mathematically best gear and set ups in addition to skill so I can win?" There you are talking about things being powerful, possibly too powerful. Is it wrong for players to use it? No but it is poor game design that has made it such an obvious "you should use this and this if you want to do X." That is why people complain. "This is B.S! This is B.S! I paid money! Cash money, dollars money, cash money!"
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui The Honor of the Fallen Biomassed. 806	Posted - 2014.05.29 22:02:00 - [7] - Quote Vulpes Dolosus wrote: Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Excuse the interruption but can anyone tell me how to file a help ticket ? http://dust514.com/user/help-tickets/ From the front page > Community > Support > Submit Ticket Thank you so very much . Well appreciated . Stop Tact Striking and come and get this Null Cannon with your GUNS you scrubs .
MINA Longstrike 805	Posted - 2014.05.29 22:03:00 - [8] - Quote The problem with fotm is that it's the path of least resistance, and is most frequently used to completely destroy the fun of others. Gallente scouts are awful to deal with if you're not a scout yourself. Huge numbers of vehicles cannot be fought by non-squads of avers / vehicles. Frisbee remotes are pathetically easy and require no gungame. Heavy frames / Light frames are used simply because they offer so many advantages over other suits. FoTM is complained about because of the frustration it causes in people who don't abuse it. I cannot count the number of dren scouts with cloaks, remotes and shotguns I have encountered just today, let alone in the past months. Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Kirjuun Heiian. I have a few alts.
Nothing Certain Bioshock Rejects 775	Posted - 2014.05.29 22:13:00 - [9] - Quote It is a glass half full/half empty thing. If the game never changed then FOTM makes it boring and predictable, but things change, still. I kind of find it fun trying to guess what chsnges will come so I can skill into them now. I went proto swarms in 1.7 because I figured nothing was so clearly broken, CCP is going to buff the hell out of these things. That one didn't work out so well. Because, that's why.
Eko Sol Strange Playings 402	Posted - 2014.05.29 22:30:00 - [10] - Quote Joseph Ridgeson wrote: Assault/Plasma Rifle was not nerfed in 1.7; just that far better weapons were added. For every other patch in Uprising, that is when the Assault/Plasma Rifle was nerfed. The AR was nerfed. They increased spray to make it practically unusable in a 1v1 strafe battle. Re read the notes for 1.7. All of that being said. I appreciate everyone's feedback except for the first idiot (One Eyed King). I guess my rebuttle to the complaints is that using alternate styles has a risk of causing you to die and/or lose a bit more often and I don't think there is an issue with that. I like running my Gal Assault with a Proto AR. It's actually fun doing well. Right now I'm finishing my last 4 Ratatti's Assault Aur Purchase (worth a try tbh for anyone with some extra aur). No one is going to say that is FoTM but I do well and enjoy it. I must admit. I decided to run a basic min scout without cloak but instead with compact hives and RE's. Some HP and a complex dampener with a basic AR. Unfortunately, I was very unsuccessful but I actually enjoyed the attempt from my part. reminded me of when I skilled into min scout a the beginning of 1.8 and I had to run the basic and adv only without a cloak b/c it took up too much PG and CPU and I didn't get the proto until far after 1.8. Anyway, nothing wrong with it. The game is unbalanced and it's not the players faults that they play the game in a selfish way. Can't blame them for wanting to win. It's more of CCP's fault and CPM's fault really (I have seen very little evidence that they argued proper balance and very few of them even play the game). Balance is the problem not FoTM IMO. PSN is "Ekopalm" I play D3, Child of Light, and solo games Also, Proto Trolling until I'm broke...

AFK Godfather Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation 158	Posted - 2014.05.29 23:06:00 - [11] - Quote FoTM syndrome means the game is unbalanced. People flock to the easiest / best / most OP set up. What's wrong with playing an unbalanced game? If it floats your boat, then nothing. The fact that you don't seem to have a problem with a game being unbalanced shows that DUST is perfect for you.
Eko Sol Strange Playings 402	Posted - 2014.05.29 23:08:00 - [12] - Quote AFK Godfather wrote: FoTM syndrome means the game is unbalanced. People flock to the easiest / best / most OP set up. What's wrong with playing an unbalanced game? If it floats your boat, then nothing. The fact that you don't seem to have a problem with a game being unbalanced shows that DUST is perfect for you. I didn't say that I don't have a problem with the unbalanced elements. Trust me, there are things I think they should do. That being said, I accept the reality that if I am a cloaked shotgun scout against another cloaked shotgun scout then how is that unbalanced? It only becomes unbalanced when I'm up against those tactical AR's people have been using lately. Not entirely sure why though. PSN is "Ekopalm" I play D3, Child of Light, and solo games Also, Proto Trolling until I'm broke...
AFK Godfather Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation 158	Posted - 2014.05.29 23:18:00 - [13] - Quote Eko Sol wrote: AFK Godfather wrote: FoTM syndrome means the game is unbalanced. People flock to the easiest / best / most OP set up. What's wrong with playing an unbalanced game? If it floats your boat, then nothing. The fact that you don't seem to have a problem with a game being unbalanced shows that DUST is perfect for you. I didn't say that I don't have a problem with the unbalanced elements. Trust me, there are things I think they should do. That being said, I accept the reality that if I am a cloaked shotgun scout against another cloaked shotgun scout then how is that unbalanced? It only becomes unbalanced when I'm up against those tactical AR's people have been using lately. Not entirely sure why though. Because you can use the same unbalanced element doesn't make it balanced.
ReGnYuM Escrow Removal and Acquisition Negative-Feedback 3037	Posted - 2014.05.29 23:22:00 - [14] - Quote There is nothing wrong with FOTM, as long as it is noted and then fixed in a timely manner. CCP has failed at both... The Pathway to Hell, is paved with good intentions Total Molden Heath Domination Imminent: 97.51% Complete
sabre prime The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 267	Posted - 2014.05.29 23:27:00 - [15] - Quote To Eko: You started 30 days before 1.7 and you have 22 mil SP? I'm from closed beta and I'm just getting to 20 mil now. Regarding FOTM, it's a consequence of this game's flawed design. The game used to keep changing every month, with no balance being maintained. What did everyone expect was going to happen? I am currently a cloaked, bricked gallente scout with an assault combat rifle. And no, I don't care anymore. FOTM is fun. Desperate attempt to get BPOs
el OPERATOR Capital Acquisitions LLC General Tso's Alliance 172	Posted - 2014.05.29 23:38:00 - [16] - Quote FoTM is a problem that is a result of a larger problem. FoTM is a problem on its own because it leads to relatively stagnant, undynamic gameplay. Most everyone just uses/spams whatever the FoTM is. The larger problem is the inherent imbalanced design which allowed for the creation of the imbalances in the first place. DUST is fundamentally supposed to have a "rock-paper-scissors" balance at its core. The balance is supposed to ensure no one element is the All-Time Winner, there's always supposed to be a reasonable counter that isn't just rock vs. bigger rock. The FoTM presence is a result of that balance not existing, evidenced by ppl flocking in droves to whatever item/fitting can be calculated as the Most Often Winner. Is this bad? yes. When gameplay stagnates, players frustrate. When players frustrate, players quit. When players quit, games die off. the end. Open-Beta Vet. Drunk Night Tree Burner. This is my Main and Original. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR.
Scheneighnay McBob T.R.I.A.D Ushra'Khan 5120	Posted - 2014.05.29 23:41:00 - [17] - Quote I'm a jack of all trades- that means I can take advantage of FOTMers, because I always have access to a counter. I just need to experiment a little before I create the correct "bane" fit. BOOP!
Michael Arck 4565	Posted - 2014.05.29 23:42:00 - [18] - Quote People will do whatever it takes or go with whatever is strongest, to win. All the nerfing can't stop that. Archistrategos *Where the fear has gone there will be nothing....only I will remain*
Zirzo Valcyn Gunners Acadamy 528	Posted - 2014.05.29 23:46:00 - [19] - Quote well as the saying goes you can't hate the player, hate the game.. water runs where it can go same as FOTM.. it's not a players fault really for choosing to be powerful.. yea it's frowned upon going the FOTM.. an actual FOTM chaser is worse than a guy who's just the current FOTM, some players are total FOTM chasers.. some end up as FOTM by circumstance. TLDR dont let anyone try to dictate how you play your game, someone will always be talking **** reguardless of what you choose. i chose to run broken weapons in the past and no one gave me a medal for it. u can ban the troll out of the forums but u can't ban the forums out of the troll. forum warrior .189
Zirzo Valcyn Gunners Acadamy 528	Posted - 2014.05.29 23:51:00 - [20] - Quote One Eyed King wrote: You are right. There is nothing wrong with using broken mechanics to "win" inherently meaningless battles others just want to have fun in. I am sure this kind of thing didn't lead to a great many people quitting the game before they even had the chance to see its strong points. But you go on ahead and keep doing what you are doing and needing to win at all costs, because then we will all know that you are consequently a superior human being to everyone else. oh the stfu dude eko is cool ppl in game... lol @ "chance to see it's strong points" fanboy more less please.. u can ban the troll out of the forums but u can't ban the forums out of the troll. forum warrior .189

Matticus Monk Ordus Trismegistus 1942	Posted - 2014.05.29 23:56:00 - [21] - Quote Using the best gear for the job makes sense if your doing PC or perhaps an FW game.... To me when I see a fit become the current flavor because it provides a clear tactical advantage and I run across it being used in pubs by a bunch of people that used to run different fits I just think: "This dude is a scrub nugget that is compensating for poor gun-game or tactical skills" Maybe it's fun for them and that's great but it sucks for people that are interested in another role that is less tactically viable.... These FOTM chasers are making pubs a horrible place for lower SP players and that is ultimately worse for the game. FOTM is only a problem becaues of human nature (big surprise).... As for King, he's a fellow scout and like us all has been abused for the better portion of a year only to now have CCP overdo it on the scout balancing and make the G-Scout such a FOTM menace while leaving the Min/Amarr in a very oddly, quasi-useless place.... I understand and relate to his bitterness. Double posting like a Kaiser.
John Demonsbane Unorganized Ninja Infantry Tactics League of Infamy 3447	Posted - 2014.05.30 00:00:00 - [22] - Quote sabre prime wrote: To Eko: You started 30 days before 1.7 and you have 22 mil SP? I'm from closed beta and I'm just getting to 20 mil now. Regarding FOTM, it's a consequence of this game's flawed design. The game used to keep changing every month, with no balance being maintained. What did everyone expect was going to happen? I am currently a cloaked, bricked gallente scout with an assault combat rifle. And no, I don't care anymore. FOTM is fun. I was wondering the same thing. Sounds fishy. The problem with FOTM is twofold: One, it's boring. Diversity is the lifeblood of this game. Two, it's a marker for bad balancing. It punishes people who like to play a certain way (logi, for example) because if a specific setup is markedly superior to others, the others fade away and die. How many good logis you see running around now? Ok, a third,reason: it's bullsh*t. A Caldari scout hiding behind a wall got off 2 shotgun rounds on me without de cloaking last night. I saw him out of the corner of my eye but he was barely even visible as a shimmer and had already fired a round as I turned. I was dead before I could return fire. My cores are maxed and I had a complex precision enhancer on my suit. That's an unfair mechanic and makes people not want to play. That's never healthy for a game. (The godfather of tactical logistics) Quitting cold turkey was impossible. The forum patch is helping me kick the habit
Krixus Flux Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation 333	Posted - 2014.05.30 00:20:00 - [23] - Quote Bro, pubs always has been horrible. I don't care. If weapon A kills you faster than weapon B, I'm running with weapon A. Deal with it dude. It's just a video game bro. Saying what's on people's minds
Eko Sol Strange Playings 403	Posted - 2014.05.30 00:45:00 - [24] - Quote John Demonsbane wrote: sabre prime wrote: To Eko: You started 30 days before 1.7 and you have 22 mil SP? I'm from closed beta and I'm just getting to 20 mil now. Regarding FOTM, it's a consequence of this game's flawed design. The game used to keep changing every month, with no balance being maintained. What did everyone expect was going to happen? I am currently a cloaked, bricked gallente scout with an assault combat rifle. And no, I don't care anymore. FOTM is fun. I was wondering the same thing. Sounds fishy. The problem with FOTM is twofold: One, it's boring. Diversity is the lifeblood of this game. Two, it's a marker for bad balancing. It punishes people who like to play a certain way (logi, for example) because if a specific setup is markedly superior to others, the others fade away and die. How many good logis you see running around now? Ok, a third,reason: it's bullsh*t. A Caldari scout hiding behind a wall got off 2 shotgun rounds on me without de cloaking last night. I saw him out of the corner of my eye but he was barely even visible as a shimmer and had already fired a round as I turned. I was dead before I could return fire. My cores are maxed and I had a complex precision enhancer on my suit. That's an unfair mechanic and makes people not want to play. That's never healthy for a game. 1) I used 30 day passive since like day 10 of me playing. I have used a booster every chance I could and omega's during every event the last 4 or 5 months. Not to mention that I've easily picked up 2 mil or so after bonus pool was exhausted over the course of me starting. Can't tell you how many 1k WP ambush matches I run a week after my SP pool is depleted. It's a lot. 2) I don't think FoTM is boring. Two people with the exact same fit duking it out is a way of measuring your skill (i.e. I beat that guy 3 to 2 so I feel good about my abilities). Using a non FoTM and doing reasonably well is a sign of skill as well. 3) 100% a marker for bad balance. And you are right, there is a punishment if you decide not to play the FoTM to help in another way. This is why I actually have a lower KDR than most scouts the past couple of months. It's because I choose a harassment role as opposed to the typical scout role. Harrasement is when you take on multiple people at the same time and distract them to attract more players to a single null. When they do this it frees up the other nulls. 4) Cloaks are getting nerfed ridiculously. Every scout will have to use a complex dampener to include a Gal scout. Without it a single complex precision enhancer on any medium will pick up every scout that doesn't except for Gal. A single one on any scout suit will pick up all scouts to include the gal if they don't wear a dampener. Personally, there should only be one equipment slot AND I think there should be one less module slot. The suits are small yet hold as many modules as a heavy. I don't think that makes a lot of sense. I run cloaked scout and uncloaked. I will adapt and the nerfing of the dampening on the cloak hurts me. I've posted other threads about this as well. To get by a triple precision enhanced proto cal scout I have to run 3 complex dampeners and be cloaked with the proto cloak. Most Cal Scouts wear two allowing me to get by with 3x dampeners and no cloak which will be fun. Anyway, I get that there is a balance issue and agree on that. But I have to take the stand that it's not the players faults that play that way. PSN is "Ekopalm" I play D3, Child of Light, and solo games Also, Proto Trolling until I'm broke...
Onesimus Tarsus Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 2044	Posted - 2014.05.30 01:06:00 - [25] - Quote FotM disappears in the face of K/D(r) / WP/D(r) matchmaking. So does imbalance. So does proto-stomping. So does academy-burn. One server-side fix to proper matchmaking, and this game fixes itself. Battlefield 1943. Running since 2009. I'm diskinetic, BTW. Birth, growth, decline, death.
John Demonsbane Unorganized Ninja Infantry Tactics League of Infamy 3447	Posted - 2014.05.30 02:46:00 - [26] - Quote Eko Sol wrote: 2) I don't think FoTM is boring. Two people with the exact same fit duking it out is a way of measuring your skill (i.e. I beat that guy 3 to 2 so I feel good about my abilities). Using a non FoTM and doing reasonably well is a sign of skill as well. It's boring because you see nothing else. There's no adapting to changing tactics, no variety. No paper. It's all rock and scissors. You may like duking it out because you're a scout and are using the FoTM. I don't, so I don't. I will lose every time to the cloaked shotty scout and I will never be able to be convinced that I should be OK with 99% of people using it because there is no effective counter. Eko Sol wrote: 4) Cloaks are getting nerfed ridiculously. Do you even CCP? Of course it's getting nerfed, that's what they do. That's why we end up with this BS in the first place! Oh, and on that note: inb4 everyone cries moar respects because my ~~callogi~~ ~~TAR~~ ~~flaylock~~ invisible suit got nerfed. That's yet another problem with the FoTM. When people lose their crutch I gotta deal with their fcking bitching about it for the next 2 months. Eko Sol wrote:* Anyway, I get that there is a balance issue and agree on that. But I have to take the stand that it's not the players faults that play that way. Why not? Lets take the 1.7 epidemic of RR sentinels. I'm sorry but that just screams "I need 1000eHP to be relevant." I don't respect that. Let's go a step further. Nyain San spamming 4 tanks in ambush backed up by brick tanked slayer proto gal logis perma-scanning everyone and turning spawn camping into an art form. I suppose that didn't make anyone quit the game? Or made 50% of the dedicated players avoid 1/3 of the available game modes like the plague for months? Should I pat them on the back and give them an award for excellence in making the game shi!t for everyone else? (The godfather of tactical logistics) Quitting cold turkey was impossible. The forum patch is helping me kick the habit
One Eyed King Land of the BIind 1707	Posted - 2014.05.30 03:56:00 - [27] - Quote Zirzo Valcyn wrote: One Eyed King wrote: You are right. There is nothing wrong with using broken mechanics to "win" inherently meaningless battles others just want to have fun in. I am sure this kind of thing didn't lead to a great many people quitting the game before they even had the chance to see its strong points. But you go on ahead and keep doing what you are doing and needing to win at all costs, because then we will all know that you are consequently a superior human being to everyone else. oh the stfu dude eko is cool ppl in game... lol @ "chance to see it's strong points" fanboy more less please.. Maybe you ought to rethink labeling someone on a sample size of one. If you weren't aware, that is a bad way of doing things. I suggest looking at my posts just after FF, and tell me again that I am a fan boy. "I've made a huge mistake." -G.O.B. Bluth
Operative 1125 Lokaas True Companion Planetary Requisitions 208	Posted - 2014.05.30 04:51:00 - [28] - Quote FOTM breaks the game. That was my dream, to break the game. It was my nightmare. I promoted it and it came to fruition. Why? Because I know CCP. I tried to warn you. This was inevitable. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. THIS IS THE VOICE OF RÁN


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.