Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Egonz4
316
|
Posted - 2014.05.26 14:58:00 -
[1] - Quote
It's like it doesn't even exist anymore....the plasma cannon got mentioned in the Hotfix but no Flaylock?!.......plz ccp it needs some serious love.....Pyrex said it was fine but u have to remember he is using dual proto with level 4 or 5 proficiency and it still is not that good..........plz ccp some news woul be good
Master of The Flaylock
|
Leeroy Gannarsein
Legio DXIV
319
|
Posted - 2014.05.26 15:06:00 -
[2] - Quote
For the so-called 'master of the flaylock' you do like to complain about them.
MY ACTUAL NAME IS LORHAK
It would seem like wisdom, but for the warning in my heart...
CCP BLOWOUT FOR CPM1
|
Ghost Kaisar
The Last of DusT. General Tso's Alliance
4915
|
Posted - 2014.05.26 15:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
Leeroy Gannarsein wrote:For the so-called 'master of the flaylock' you do like to complain about them.
He hasn't even earned the title.
Default title goes to me, as I did the Breach Flaylock fights in T-Dome undefeated.
He is an upstart-ish rouge
Headed to Destiny, To Hell with CCP
PSN: EVL_Elgost105
RIP Dust514 05/02/14 GG CCP
|
Galvan Nized
Deep Space Republic
985
|
Posted - 2014.05.26 16:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
The Plasma Cannon is finally getting some love (it will still be terrible but we are going in the right direction.)
Even have Rattatti talking with us about said cannon and how it could potentially be fixed.
If the PlC is getting some attention then you know the Flaylock may see usefulness. There is hope! |
Thang Bausch
Pierrot Le Fou Industries
143
|
Posted - 2014.05.26 16:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
As much as I'd like the flaylock brought back to some relevancy, I'd be fine if they at least did a weapon respec so I could get the mill or so sp back I spent on it. |
Egonz4
317
|
Posted - 2014.05.26 18:04:00 -
[6] - Quote
Well first off yes I do complain about the Flaylock a lot but its because noone uses them and they are crap...but with that said I still have many instances that would Prove I am the master....eeryone I go up against with a Flaylock loses to my adv/basic dual wielded fit.
I have a fit tht has nothing on it except 2 spawn pads and a basic Fl....and I take out people with it all the time.....it just takes skill......after the Flaylock isn't crap I shall rule new Eden!!! That's what I want
Master of The Flaylock
|
Benjamin Ciscko
The Last of DusT. General Tso's Alliance
2288
|
Posted - 2014.05.26 20:44:00 -
[7] - Quote
Egonz4 wrote:It's like it doesn't even exist anymore....the plasma cannon got mentioned in the Hotfix but no Flaylock?!.......plz ccp it needs some serious love.....Pyrex said it was fine but u have to remember he is using dual proto with level 4 or 5 proficiency and it still is not that good..........plz ccp some news woul be good Statement is now invalid!
Tanker/Logi
|
Denchlad 7
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
272
|
Posted - 2014.05.26 22:19:00 -
[8] - Quote
Firstly, I use the Flaylock almost exclusively as my sidearm on every fit and have Prof IV, but you dont see me going around proclaiming myself as a "Master". I just say im bloody good with it, just not all the time. Secondly, saying "Pyrex says" is a fast track for people to call you a scrub. Pyrex is fairly good with the Flaylock, which may explain why he thinks its okay - but not good, to say. Thirdly, Ghost Kaisar > You, at Flaylocking. And fourthly and now on topic, I feel like it needs a minor splash damage buff, direct hit is fine.
I will be the only player to Prototype every single god damn weapon before Dust dies. I swear to it.
|
Schecter 666
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
15
|
Posted - 2014.05.26 23:26:00 -
[9] - Quote
C Saunders still does quite well with it! |
Tech De Ra
Electronic Sports League
418
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 00:10:00 -
[10] - Quote
Egonz4 wrote:It's like it doesn't even exist anymore....the plasma cannon got mentioned in the Hotfix but no Flaylock?!.......plz ccp it needs some serious love.....Pyrex said it was fine but u have to remember he is using dual proto with level 4 or 5 proficiency and it still is not that good..........plz ccp some news woul be good
Pyrex said it needed buffing when it was FOTM, then did a 180 a few months later
Don't listen to Pyrex, he doesn't really say anything useful
Prime League champion
SGL Sidearm champion
Fanfest '14 All star champion
|
|
John Demonsbane
Unorganized Ninja Infantry Tactics League of Infamy
3432
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 00:54:00 -
[11] - Quote
One, the flaylock still needs to pay for its crimes against humanity.
Two, the problem with the OPs argument is that while the flaylock was once king, the PLC has always been shite, so why would the flaylock be a higher priority?
Three, pretty sure the splash was the problem with the flaylock to begin with, so be careful with that!
Quitting cold turkey was impossible. The forum patch is helping me kick the habit!
See you in Destiny
Amarr victor
|
Duran Lex
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
1055
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 01:02:00 -
[12] - Quote
I'm fine with the splash variant. It's whatever.
I just want a god damn low splash, high direct damage variant with faster missile travel to compensate.
Missile speed is too slow for efficient direct hits.
Add a muzzle made out of duct tape to increase that propulsion CCP. |
FLAY LOCKED
Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation
83
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 01:05:00 -
[13] - Quote
All of you shut up and bow down to me! |
Egonz4
317
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 01:10:00 -
[14] - Quote
Denchlad 7 wrote:Firstly, I use the Flaylock almost exclusively as my sidearm on every fit and have Prof IV, but you dont see me going around proclaiming myself as a "Master". I just say im bloody good with it, just not all the time. Secondly, saying "Pyrex says" is a fast track for people to call you a scrub. Pyrex is fairly good with the Flaylock, which may explain why he thinks its okay - but not good, to say. Thirdly, Ghost Kaisar > You, at Flaylocking. And fourthly and now on topic, I feel like it needs a minor splash damage buff, direct hit is fine. Maybe you don't say your a master cuz you don't know how good you are with it,.....and i mentioned Pyrex cuz he said it didn't need a buff....that is all...but sry I offended you
Master of The Flaylock
|
LT SHANKS
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
2552
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 01:11:00 -
[15] - Quote
I thought Pyrex has been saying it needs a buff. |
Egonz4
317
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 01:16:00 -
[16] - Quote
LT SHANKS wrote:I thought Pyrex has been saying it needs a buff. He was trolling....even though its true....yeah I hate that about him
Master of The Flaylock
|
Egonz4
317
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 01:20:00 -
[17] - Quote
If my signature made anyone's mad who uses a Flaylock then I'm sry and I'm sure you are good with it too....I solute all that still use it
I changed it :D
self proclaimed - Master of The Flaylock
|
Eltra Ardell
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
418
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 05:27:00 -
[18] - Quote
Flaylock in its prime was absurdly easy to apply damage with:
http://themittani.com/features/dust-514-flaylock-pistol-flay-2-win
It had a splash radius of 2.5m, for god's sake. That's a 56% larger area of effect than the modern 2m. The current flaylock is difficult to score hits with and does so little damage that it's hardly capable of finishing off any enemy.
Return the flaylock's damage values to pre-nerf levels and retain the reduced splash radius. Give it 100% damage against vehicles. You now have a weapon that is capable of finishing off infantry and serving as pocket AV as well. 644 damage wouldn't be enough to kill a vehicle in a single magazine, but it would be enough to make a difference, especially with AV grenades. |
m twiggz
Pradox One Proficiency V.
648
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 06:14:00 -
[19] - Quote
Proto Flaylock with proficiency is still a decent sidearm. It's great at taking out equipment, checking null cannons for REs before you hack and being an annoying little prick. |
Eko Sol
Strange Playings
386
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 07:11:00 -
[20] - Quote
Egonz4 wrote:It's like it doesn't even exist anymore....the plasma cannon got mentioned in the Hotfix but no Flaylock?!.......plz ccp it needs some serious love.....Pyrex said it was fine but u have to remember he is using dual proto with level 4 or 5 proficiency and it still is not that good..........plz ccp some news woul be good
I love the flaylock as is tbh. Any buff of any sort could tip balance dangerously. I use it to deal with cloaked scouts at nulls because the splash damage ensures a hit. Imagine a buff to radius. Then I don't have to aim so accurately because i'm guaranteed damage.
I don't know for sure but for now it is fine.
PSN is "Ekopalm"
I play D3, Child of Light, and solo games
Also, Proto Trolling until I'm broke...
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |