|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 19 post(s) |
Xx-VxF-xX
Void of Faction
66
|
Posted - 2014.05.23 22:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
Still waiting for the announcement of Gallente Scout dampening bonus will be reduced to -1% per level to force one fully SPECIALIZED in gallente scout and dampening to require 3 x complex profile dampeners to avoid all scans. The rewarding SPECIALIZATION is being used so much and this would seem to go along with the flow of it. Not to mention the very odd -5% dampening on the proto cloak Forcing Gallente to sacrifice more to be invisible to tac-net |
Xx-VxF-xX
Void of Faction
69
|
Posted - 2014.05.25 11:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Eko Sol wrote:Cat Merc wrote:For the love of everything that's holy do not touch the Gallente dampening bonus. It is the only ******* suit that can do anything about Caldari scouts.
All you need is one Caldari scout and yay, wall hack for the entire squad! This isn't true. The Cal scout is OP because it transfers it's tacnet to squad mates. That should be fixed IMO. Or everyone should get my Min Hack Bonus and everyone on your team should get your Gal bonus, etc. They shouldn't share Tacnet displays. Then I can just tell my squad where everything is? Really your going to compare instant precise shared tac-net to you telling your squad, lol you must be a very fast detailed talker.
|
Xx-VxF-xX
Void of Faction
69
|
Posted - 2014.05.25 19:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Xx-VxF-xX wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Eko Sol wrote:Cat Merc wrote:For the love of everything that's holy do not touch the Gallente dampening bonus. It is the only ******* suit that can do anything about Caldari scouts.
All you need is one Caldari scout and yay, wall hack for the entire squad! This isn't true. The Cal scout is OP because it transfers it's tacnet to squad mates. That should be fixed IMO. Or everyone should get my Min Hack Bonus and everyone on your team should get your Gal bonus, etc. They shouldn't share Tacnet displays. Then I can just tell my squad where everything is? Really your going to compare instant precise shared tac-net to you telling your squad, lol you must be a very fast detailed talker. It's not as good sure, but I can easily say "stop" to give me time to describe the situation. It's no comparison to how good instant precise tac-net is. you say "stop" and start to describe the situation and the situation changes again before your done describing it. changes in the amount of time it takes you to say "stop". |
Xx-VxF-xX
Void of Faction
74
|
Posted - 2014.05.26 21:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:How about changing that useless 5% scan range bonus to a dampener bonus?
3%-5% per level to dampeners. but...but...I want 2% hybrid-plasma weapon optimal or effective range per level.
Everyone wants to be the Queen even though one Pawn can be the difference in winning and losing.
|
Xx-VxF-xX
Void of Faction
74
|
Posted - 2014.05.26 21:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
XxGhazbaranxX wrote:So let me get this straight, The gallente scout is getting all it's ewar nerfed, specially the range while the cal;dari gets to keeps a 3% to range per level...
I have never used a brick tanks and now with these changes you have just nerfed the gallente intel ewar ability to complete uselessness. I am serious the gallente scout has had the range bonus since before the changes to scouts and no one ever complained until brick tanked scouts became a thing, which means that the problem is not the scan range.
The problem is and always has been brick tanked scouts and that second equipment slot which is unnecessary. Either you cloak or you don't and fit remotes or whatever.
CCP this is crazy... If you dont change the brick tanking ability all you dod was make the gall scout remain more as an assault.
DON"T take the scan range that it has always had now. Before 1.8 the Gal scout had the role of eWAR scanner that is now the Cal scouts job. Cal is intel gathering - precision/range Gal is denial of intel - dampening/? - since nobody want them to have any kind of cloak bonus even though it fits.
Since Cal can share there vision maybe a gal can share its dampening within there scan range? kinda like a dampening field/precision scrambler, lol
Everyone wants to be the Queen even though one Pawn can be the difference in winning and losing.
|
Xx-VxF-xX
Void of Faction
74
|
Posted - 2014.05.26 22:14:00 -
[6] - Quote
Spartan MK420 wrote:Xx-VxF-xX wrote:XxGhazbaranxX wrote:So let me get this straight, The gallente scout is getting all it's ewar nerfed, specially the range while the cal;dari gets to keeps a 3% to range per level...
I have never used a brick tanks and now with these changes you have just nerfed the gallente intel ewar ability to complete uselessness. I am serious the gallente scout has had the range bonus since before the changes to scouts and no one ever complained until brick tanked scouts became a thing, which means that the problem is not the scan range.
The problem is and always has been brick tanked scouts and that second equipment slot which is unnecessary. Either you cloak or you don't and fit remotes or whatever.
CCP this is crazy... If you dont change the brick tanking ability all you dod was make the gall scout remain more as an assault.
DON"T take the scan range that it has always had now. Before 1.8 the Gal scout had the role of eWAR scanner that is now the Cal scouts job. Cal is intel gathering - precision/range Gal is denial of intel - dampening/? - since nobody want them to have any kind of cloak bonus even though it fits. Since Cal can share there vision maybe a gal can share its dampening within there scan range? kinda like a dampening field/precision scrambler, lol a squad of 6 gall scouts=ninja warriors there yeah that was my sarcasm vs the shared squad vision.
Everyone wants to be the Queen even though one Pawn can be the difference in winning and losing.
|
Xx-VxF-xX
Void of Faction
80
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 02:55:00 -
[7] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:I don't, and if you draw up dmg/cap (pg+cpu) invested, the new curve is much more reasonable, in my honest opinion and in line with most damage curves in Dust 514. Given my other reasoning that I linked to, I firmly have two feet to stand on, on the issue. Can I have a dummy grenade that cost 0/0 cpu/pg. All I use grenades for is to scare a target out of cover. They don't know what type of grenade i'm throwing and that is all I use my std locus for anyway. Might even save my life as I think I have killed myself more with them than anything else. |
|
|
|