|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
anaboop
NECROM0NGERS
Caps and Mercs
84
   |
Posted - 2014.05.22 09:54:00 -
[1] - Quote
Tanks are ok, yeah whatever, your data is wrong. Enough said.
Fully sick Anaboop trading card
|
anaboop
NECROM0NGERS
Caps and Mercs
84
|
Posted - 2014.05.22 12:11:00 -
[2] - Quote
Atiim wrote:anaboop wrote:Tanks are ok, yeah whatever, your data is wrong.
Ive be patient long enough Give vehicle command, turrents and upgrades respec and see how many bother speccing into them over again. I bet they get the bare minimum and run those ****** up militia tanks.
Then trying claiming they are good where they are. Then would you like to supply non-anecdotal data of your own? Rebalancing does not constitute Respec. No other item that received a nerf received a respec (including AV), so I'm not quite sure what makes you entitled to one.
I dont see any of his data, I don't see why I should even bother. Considering nothing will be done anyway.
Its laughable that you think I was asking for, even that i was hoping to get a respec. I was stating that hardly anyone thats fully specced In to tanks at the moment will bother speccing back into them if they did. While you just get a militia tank and slap militia gear on and be just as good.
Wipe your nose its a little brown.
Take care there byebye then.
Fully sick Anaboop trading card
|
anaboop
NECROM0NGERS
Caps and Mercs
87
|
Posted - 2014.05.23 22:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
medomai grey wrote:Harpyja wrote:Tank vs tank is NOT fine.
Please tell me why is it fine that my alt with 0 SP into vehicles can fit a glass cannon Sica and destroy every tank out there regardless of their SP investment? While getting destroyed only sets me back 70k?
Tank vs tank is NOT fine if SP investment doesn't play a role. Proto dropsuits have huge advantages over militia suits, while fully skilled tanks only have marginal benefits, if any at all if you don't consider cooldown times. Because skill >> SP investment. Proto infantry get killed all the time by mlt gear and I don't see any complaints from infantry. For those that do heavily invest in the vehicle related skill trees receive a substantial advantage over those who did not; I'm an ADS pilot, don't BS me. Tank vs. tank is fine. This may come off as harsh but HTFU(Harden The **** UP) and stop relying on your gear to carry you. 
I call BS. Infantry are not all getting 2-3 shoted, from someone in militia gear where tanks are. Except the weapons people are already complaining about.
Sp investment would make a difference in the long run, but 2-3 shots isnt long enough for any kind of difference no matter how much sp u have.
Fully sick Anaboop trading card
|
anaboop
NECROM0NGERS
Caps and Mercs
87
|
Posted - 2014.05.24 12:37:00 -
[4] - Quote
Atiim wrote:anaboop wrote:
I call BS. Infantry are not all getting 2-3 shoted, from someone in militia gear where tanks are. Except the weapons people are already complaining about.
Sp investment would make a difference in the long run, but 2-3 shots isnt long enough for any kind of difference no matter how much sp u have.
A MLT Sniper Rifle and MLT Shotgun are both weapons that can 1-3 shot Infantry, and aren't being complained about.
Redline snipers, cloaked shotgun users, enough said.
Fully sick Anaboop trading card
|
|
|
| |
|