|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 21 post(s) |
Ender Storm
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
132
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 23:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
If anyone is going to build a PC before the end of the year, I sugest waiting some months if you going with Intel.
Theres a new cpu coming out, code name Devil`s Canyon, with is a better performer than the actual generation line up, will have better thermal performance and supposedly better overclockability. A new chipset will come forth as well, if I am not mistaken.
Of course, only if you not in a hurry. Thats pretty much why I did not upgraded yet my mobo / cpu / ram on my tower. |
Ender Storm
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
138
|
Posted - 2014.05.15 18:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
Kigurosaka Laaksonen wrote:Here's my goal for a PC build.
A console will typically cost anywhere between $300 - $600 and last (until a new console is released. my NES still works fine, for example) for anywhere from 4 - 7 years.
Along those lines, I figure for highest cost and shortest longevity, a PC build for $600 that will last reliably for 4 years, playing games on, we'll say, medium graphics. I can't get it to work.
Its not like PC's will degrade like fruits and consoles will keep performance.
Both will keep performance at the same levels.
But while consoles will have to conform to the same level of performance for 4 years, PC's will evolve.
So, if ever comes a point when your PC cant anymore play at max, downgrade its settings. It will be equal, if not better, than the games coming out for the console in 4 years. |
Ender Storm
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
146
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 18:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
Kigurosaka Laaksonen wrote:Ender Storm wrote:Kigurosaka Laaksonen wrote:Here's my goal for a PC build.
A console will typically cost anywhere between $300 - $600 and last (until a new console is released. my NES still works fine, for example) for anywhere from 4 - 7 years.
Along those lines, I figure for highest cost and shortest longevity, a PC build for $600 that will last reliably for 4 years, playing games on, we'll say, medium graphics. I can't get it to work. Its not like PC's will degrade like fruits and consoles will keep performance. Both will keep performance at the same levels. But while consoles will have to conform to the same level of performance for 4 years, PC's will evolve. So, if ever comes a point when your PC cant anymore play at max, downgrade its settings. It will be equal, if not better, than the games coming out for the console in 4 years. I'm aware PC's don't degrade like fruits, but it gets to the point where you don't want to play a few games on low settings at 20 fps anymore, and then you build a new PC or upgrade if you can. In my case, I have already upgraded my video card. Within a year, I'll likely build a new PC. The build I asked about has a budget of $600 and should be able to play most games at high fps on high to medium settings for about 4 years. Can that be done, or not?
Well, my pc CPU is like, idk, 7 years old (E8400, dual core #3.6ghz). My video card is a GTX 570, it has about 3 years on it.
I still play games at or near max settings.
So yeah, i am pretty sure a good pc today will last far more then 4 years. Especially considering DX11 will be like mantle, bypassing more of the abstraction layer thus providing better performance than the actual one.
I am not sure about price, i am not looking into upgrading right now, but from the top of my head i would take a look at the GTX 770. |
Ender Storm
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
146
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 18:06:00 -
[4] - Quote
low genius wrote:Buster Friently wrote:low genius wrote:Velociraptor antirrhopus wrote:give me the best sales pitch you've got.
to me, the most important thing is i want to know what games I'll be able to play other than Legion
i've never been a PC gamer. I've been a console gamer for almost 20 years and I never really bothered/had time for PC gaming
i'd also like to know what computer you have, how much it cost, how much you usually spend to upgrade it pc's only excel in one area: multi tasking. i've been playing both pc and console since 1996, and that is the only difference. on a pc you can watch youtube and have 5 windows of eve:online playing at once. the actual 'gaming' part of it is not different at all. This is completely wrong. Not only are there MANY more games available on PC, most of the games you can get on consoles are better on PC because of better graphics and modding - just to name a couple of completely objective differences. It is, of course, possible to play PC games and have the same experience of consoles, but there is much more on offer. this presupposes that graphics matter, and i think any hardcore gamer will agree that graphics only need to be acceptable. they never need to be mind-blowing, and if the graphics are too good, the game is usually bad. i know very few people who play more than a game or two regularly. the online-only crowd is the type of crowd who is highly addiction-prone. if a game needs to be modded, then it wasn't much of a game, now was it. as you were.
As a side note, I only buy Total War games to mod them :) |
Ender Storm
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
154
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 19:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
Velociraptor antirrhopus wrote:Dr Dammit wrote:One thing I forgot to mention: If you want to play online with a console you need a subscription. $40 for one year on PS, $60 for Xbox live Gold. Holy crap. I never put two and two together and realized that's an advantage PC gaming has. Edit: Oh wait. It's only $40 a year. Eh... I think it comes with PS Plus too. That's actually a pretty good deal considering you get a **** ton of games with PS Plus. Double Edit: Since no one has really responded/cares to my Nintendo rant, I'm copy pasta-ing it to the OP.
The caveat with plus is that you really dont own the game, you can only access it while paying plus if i am not mistaken. So its more like a lease than a free game you will have forever. Plus you get what they are willing to give you, not what you necessarily want. So many games have the risk to not be played.
|
Ender Storm
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
155
|
Posted - 2014.05.19 16:19:00 -
[6] - Quote
GerAseR wrote:The thing with PS+ counts only for the monthly (and all time) free games, everything you payed for is yours. I like consoles for the easy starting procedure. I come home, make a coffee, sit on the couch, press the button and that's it. Sometimes the games or the FW gets an update, so this will take a few minutes longer before starting the game.
No need for drivers, and the other stuff you have to deal with. Yes, you have to deal with this anyway, but not that big if you only use it to "work with". The Console is just more comfortable for me. My pc runs a couple of years now with linux what makes things much more comfortable for me too. Maybe i build a Steam OS PC for playin on PC again someday, who knows...
Yeah I was thinking about the free ones.
Nowadays drivers are no issue, windows will handle it all for you if you let it.
Even graphic drivers got a lot better with the updating, I dont remember the last time simply updating them gave me trouble. Nvidia itself will keel track of it if you use their Gforce Experience app.
Theoretically, if everything is running smooth, you dont really need to update drivers. |
Ender Storm
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
164
|
Posted - 2014.05.23 16:26:00 -
[7] - Quote
Mossellia Delt wrote:Doubt people will say this but the worst part of fps PC gaming is the community, you think the dust forums were bad on the release of legion at the dust keynote... that pales in comparison to the daily active PC fps communities.
Both suck. Get real.
My experience in meeting idiots in both platforms is pretty uniform. |
|
|
|