DUST Search - Free monthly respecs for the rest of Dust 514 lifetime

All Channels

General Discussions

Free monthly respecs for the rest of Dust 514 lifetime

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Spectral Clone Dust2Dust. Top Men. 2602	Posted - 2014.05.12 09:37:00 - [1] - Quote Is this a good idea? It could actually contribute to more feedback regarding good & bad game mechanics since players will try out new builds. R.I.P. Dust 514. You were a beta. May 2014.
RemingtonBeaver molon labe. General Tso's Alliance 962	Posted - 2014.05.12 09:54:00 - [2] - Quote But then no one would "choose aurum, get better faster, with aurum." or whatever that sexy robot lady says. I support this idea....buuuuuuttttt I see aurum respecs happening before this does Gotta milk this turnip.
Ryder Azorria Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 976	Posted - 2014.05.12 10:13:00 - [3] - Quote Erm no, then you'll just get half the people chasing the FOTM (bad) and the other half getting pissed off that they half to reassign all their SP for the 10th time (also bad).
Velociraptor antirrhopus Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation 15	Posted - 2014.05.12 10:13:00 - [4] - Quote hourly respecs are the only way

ChribbaX Otherworld Enterprises Dust Control Otherworld Empire Productions 1147	Posted - 2014.05.12 10:18:00 - [5] - Quote No respec for any reason imo. /c DUSTSearch DUSTBoard DUST Server Status

Spectral Clone Dust2Dust. Top Men. 2604	Posted - 2014.05.12 10:48:00 - [6] - Quote ChribbaX wrote: No respec for any reason imo. /c I agree, in the context that your choices matter. But they dont right now - We will get 'respecs' when moving to EVE: Legion due to the skill trees being completely different. Dust 514 will also never impact EVE in a significant way. Use Dust 514 as an experimental platform, like Kain Spero suggests, to make Legion the best FPS ever. R.I.P. Dust 514. You were a beta. May 2014.
jerrmy12 kahoalii Proficiency V. 1482	Posted - 2014.05.12 11:07:00 - [7] - Quote Ryder Azorria wrote: Erm no, then you'll just get half the people chasing the FOTM (bad) and the other half getting pissed off that they have to reassign all their SP for the 10th time (also bad). Too bad for them Optinal respec? I'd better leave...
Harpyja molon labe. General Tso's Alliance 1722	Posted - 2014.05.12 13:10:00 - [8] - Quote No. Because what would be the point to investment and dedication to a role if you can max out at least one different role each month? "By His light, and His will" - The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
Atiim Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 8350	Posted - 2014.05.12 13:37:00 - [9] - Quote Harpyja wrote: No. Because what would be the point to investment and dedication to a role if you can max out at least one different role each month? What is the point in investment and dedication to DUST 514? CCP Rouge (Crowd Control Productions - 'Neo' EVE: Legion) DUST 514 -HAND
Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 14921	Posted - 2014.05.12 15:27:00 - [10] - Quote No. CPM 0 Secretary Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist \\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked

noobsniper the 2nd Inner.Hell 525	Posted - 2014.05.12 15:31:00 - [11] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: No. Maybe Canadian, EH MAG vet raven ftw Pre 1.8 scout don't throw me in with that rift raft
Spectral Clone Dust2Dust. Top Men. 2611	Posted - 2014.05.12 15:31:00 - [12] - Quote Atiim wrote: Harpyja wrote: No. Because what would be the point to investment and dedication to a role if you can max out at least one different role each month? What is the point in investment and dedication to DUST 514? Those who cannot grasp what Atiim said are obvious CCP fanboys. R.I.P. Dust 514. You were a beta. May 2014.
Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 14921	Posted - 2014.05.12 15:37:00 - [13] - Quote The reasons why i dont want to see this happen is for the similar reasons why giving 255 million sp for everyone is bad ALSO the hassle of re skilling every month is terrible. CPM 0 Secretary Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist \\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar Silver Bullet Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY 581	Posted - 2014.05.12 15:38:00 - [14] - Quote if we are just beta testers why the hell not wtf would it hurt, it worked in mag fine
Spectral Clone Dust2Dust. Top Men. 2615	Posted - 2014.05.12 15:42:00 - [15] - Quote Since Dust 514 never left the beta stage (according to me and many others) we might as well get max SP on our characters or free respecs. R.I.P. Dust 514. You were a beta. May 2014.
Onesimus Tarsus 703rd Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive 2004	Posted - 2014.05.12 15:43:00 - [16] - Quote Atiim wrote: Harpyja wrote: No. Because what would be the point to investment and dedication to a role if you can max out at least one different role each month? What is the point in investment and dedication to DUST 514? Swear. Battlefield 1943. Running since 2009. I'm diskinetic, BTW. Birth, growth, decline, death.
Onesimus Tarsus 703rd Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive 2004	Posted - 2014.05.12 15:45:00 - [17] - Quote Spectral Clone wrote: Atiim wrote: Harpyja wrote: No. Because what would be the point to investment and dedication to a role if you can max out at least one different role each month? What is the point in investment and dedication to DUST 514? Those who cannot grasp what Atiim said are obvious CCP fanboys. Swear. Battlefield 1943. Running since 2009. I'm diskinetic, BTW. Birth, growth, decline, death.
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar Silver Bullet Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY 582	Posted - 2014.05.12 15:53:00 - [18] - Quote there shoulda been a respec for isk/risk augmentation item the whole time, ccp could have made it to where you risk loosing a percentage of your sp with every respec especially with contiued use of the item over short periods of time and it would self balence and be an isk sink, if youset the price right
Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 14921	Posted - 2014.05.12 16:03:00 - [19] - Quote Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar wrote: there shoulda been a respec for isk/risk augmentation item the whole time, ccp could have made it to where you risk loosing a percentage of your sp with every respec especially with contiued use of the item over short periods of time and it would self balence and be an isk sink, if youset the price right As system like that would be massively punishing for veterans who at that point might as well just train up the new tree instead. CPM 0 Secretary Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist \\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
Spectral Clone Dust2Dust. Top Men. 2615	Posted - 2014.05.12 16:08:00 - [20] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar wrote: there shoulda been a respec for isk/risk augmentation item the whole time, ccp could have made it to where you risk loosing a percentage of your sp with every respec especially with contiued use of the item over short periods of time and it would self balence and be an isk sink, if youset the price right As system like that would be massively punishing for veterans who at that point might as well just train up the new tree instead. Wouldnt that actually make sense IWS? R.I.P. Dust 514. You were a beta. May 2014.

Awesome Pantaloons Lokapalas. 482	Posted - 2014.05.12 16:16:00 - [21] - Quote Withholding respecs is pointless because we all know the inevitable conclusion of this beta. Respecs to test issues is pointless because CCP is no longer concerned with Dust. There are no longer any good arguments for either side. "The Wrath of God is Immense. His Justice is Swift and Decisive. His Tolerance is Limited." -The Code of Demeanor
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar Silver Bullet Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY 582	Posted - 2014.05.12 16:20:00 - [22] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar wrote: there shoulda been a respec for isk/risk augmentation item the whole time, ccp could have made it to where you risk loosing a percentage of your sp with every respec especially with contiued use of the item over short periods of time and it would self balence and be an isk sink, if youset the price right As system like that would be massively punishing for veterans who at that point might as well just train up the new tree instead. im fairly certian thatonce you reach a certian amount of sp 45-60 mil is and higher respecing wont really matter much at all and would probly be more trouble than its worth , and if you abuse the system you risk loosing some sp, its notlikeyou cant loose ur sp in eve either all you hard work in sp gone in one instant if the wrong unplaned decision is made
Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 2024	Posted - 2014.05.12 17:27:00 - [23] - Quote Atiim wrote: Harpyja wrote: No. Because what would be the point to investment and dedication to a role if you can max out at least one different role each month? What is the point in investment and dedication to DUST 514? If you have no intention of playing Legion, really none at all. But for those of us who will play Legion? Having that SP transfer over will be a nice head start. Like my ideas? Pokey Dravon for CPM1
Byozuma Kegawa Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 262	Posted - 2014.05.12 17:31:00 - [24] - Quote Honestly I'd be of the camp of, "Have to reassign my SP AGAIN!?...." because I like where my SP is already. I can see the merits of frequent respecs, but not THAT frequent, even if Dusts days ARE numbered. Assuming they will do updates I think then is the better point to have respecs.
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar Silver Bullet Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY 583	Posted - 2014.05.12 17:58:00 - [25] - Quote it should be a user drivin mechanic completely optional not a mass respec or everyones skills at the same time
Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 2025	Posted - 2014.05.12 18:27:00 - [26] - Quote Im not really a fan of respecs but I understand the community's desire. EVE sorta has something like a respec and your character starts off with 2 of them, but after that you only get a new one every 12 months. I think if they wanted to implement some sort of respec system (details pending), it should be an optional respec that happens on a very long time cycle. Like my ideas? Pokey Dravon for CPM1
A'Real Fury D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 885	Posted - 2014.05.12 18:39:00 - [27] - Quote Pokey Dravon wrote: Im not really a fan of respecs but I understand the community's desire. EVE sorta has something like a respec and your character starts off with 2 of them, but after that you only get a new one every 12 months. I think if they wanted to implement some sort of respec system (details pending), it should be an optional respec that happens on a very long time cycle. if only Dust had a long play cycle left in it. Public Relations - tick tick BOOM. PSN: CallOfTheDark
Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 2025	Posted - 2014.05.12 18:41:00 - [28] - Quote Considering the fact that Legion doesn't even have approval for funding to go into full production, I think it's unreasonable to be making assumptions about Dust's lifespan at this point. Like my ideas? Pokey Dravon for CPM1
D legendary hero Ultramarine Corp 1888	Posted - 2014.05.12 18:42:00 - [29] - Quote Harpyja wrote: No. Because what would be the point to investment and dedication to a role if you can max out at least one different role each month? because dust was abandoned by ccp so, there is no point. no role matters, and shotgun scouts make everything pointless Sou o Defendeiro dos derrubados_Pronto saberá justiça
A'Real Fury D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 886	Posted - 2014.05.12 21:02:00 - [30] - Quote Pokey Dravon wrote: Considering the fact that Legion doesn't even have approval for funding to go into full production, I think it's unreasonable to be making assumptions about Dust's lifespan at this point. Taken in isolation that may be true however when you factor in their other statements such as leaving Dust with only bug fixes and a bit of balancing left in its future and the fact that most of the development team has been moved out of Dust to either Eve or Legion does suggest a limited lifespan. Public Relations - tick tick BOOM. PSN: CallOfTheDark

RemingtonBeaver molon labe. General Tso's Alliance 964	Posted - 2014.05.12 21:06:00 - [31] - Quote Pokey Dravon wrote: Considering the fact that Legion doesn't even have approval for funding to go into full production, I think it's unreasonable to be making assumptions about Dust's lifespan at this point. I'm an avid Dust supporter. I went full mental with the keynote fiasco. I have vowed to never give CCP another dime. With that being said. Dust 514 was green lit and to be honest Legion looks and sounds a thousand times better. I can't see it not being green lit. I think PC multiplayer gaming is a garbage experience because of how easy it is to aimbot, macro, and cheat your pants off, but Legion will be approved. We all know it fits the long term goals better than Dust did. Assuming the lifespan of Dust will be short is a safe bet. And with all that being said....so far the people supporting PC and Legion are the dumbest forum posters I've encountered. Did they just lurk around until the time came to strike with maximum stupidity?
KEROSIINI-TERO The Rainbow Effect 1045	Posted - 2014.05.12 22:00:00 - [32] - Quote Spectral Clone wrote: Is this a good idea? It could actually contribute to more feedback regarding good & bad game mechanics since players will try out new builds. That would make everyone test everything in two months, and quit shortly after. No incentive to open anymore up. :-S
Spectral Clone Dust2Dust. Top Men. 2620	Posted - 2014.05.13 05:43:00 - [33] - Quote KEROSIINI-TERO wrote: Spectral Clone wrote: Is this a good idea? It could actually contribute to more feedback regarding good & bad game mechanics since players will try out new builds. That would make everyone test everything in two months, and quit shortly after. No incentive to open anymore up. It would be good IMO, Then CCP could shut down the servers and focus on the PC release. This message was brought to you by the PC master race.
Thurak1 Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 670	Posted - 2014.05.13 06:24:00 - [34] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: No. As if what this guy says means anything.
Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 14978	Posted - 2014.05.13 06:50:00 - [35] - Quote Okay based on what I now know. Answer is still a very much a No. CPM 0 Secretary Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist \\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
Isaa Quade Namtar Elite Gallente Federation 569	Posted - 2014.05.13 07:06:00 - [36] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Im a prat My reaction to Legion


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.

DUSTSearch