Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
2602
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 09:37:00 -
[1] - Quote
Is this a good idea?
It could actually contribute to more feedback regarding good & bad game mechanics since players will try out new builds.
R.I.P. Dust 514. You were a beta. May 2014.
|
RemingtonBeaver
molon labe. General Tso's Alliance
962
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 09:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
But then no one would "choose aurum, get better faster, with aurum." or whatever that sexy robot lady says.
I support this idea....buuuuuuttttt
I see aurum respecs happening before this does
Gotta milk this turnip.
|
Ryder Azorria
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
976
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 10:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
Erm no, then you'll just get half the people chasing the FOTM (bad) and the other half getting pissed off that they half to reassign all their SP for the 10th time (also bad). |
Velociraptor antirrhopus
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 10:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
hourly respecs are the only way |
|
ChribbaX
Otherworld Enterprises Dust Control Otherworld Empire Productions
1147
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 10:18:00 -
[5] - Quote
No respec for any reason imo.
/c
DUSTBoard
DUST Server Status
|
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
2604
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 10:48:00 -
[6] - Quote
ChribbaX wrote:No respec for any reason imo.
/c
I agree, in the context that your choices matter. But they dont right now - We will get 'respecs' when moving to EVE: Legion due to the skill trees being completely different. Dust 514 will also never impact EVE in a significant way.
Use Dust 514 as an experimental platform, like Kain Spero suggests, to make Legion the best FPS ever.
R.I.P. Dust 514. You were a beta. May 2014.
|
jerrmy12 kahoalii
Proficiency V.
1482
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 11:07:00 -
[7] - Quote
Ryder Azorria wrote:Erm no, then you'll just get half the people chasing the FOTM (bad) and the other half getting pissed off that they have to reassign all their SP for the 10th time (also bad). Too bad for them Optinal respec?
I'd better leave...
|
Harpyja
molon labe. General Tso's Alliance
1722
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 13:10:00 -
[8] - Quote
No. Because what would be the point to investment and dedication to a role if you can max out at least one different role each month?
"By His light, and His will"
- The Scriptures, Gheinok the First, 12:32
|
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback
8350
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 13:37:00 -
[9] - Quote
Harpyja wrote:No. Because what would be the point to investment and dedication to a role if you can max out at least one different role each month? What is the point in investment and dedication to DUST 514?
CCP Rouge (Crowd Control Productions - 'Neo' EVE: Legion) DUST 514
-HAND
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
14921
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 15:27:00 -
[10] - Quote
No.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist
\\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
|
|
noobsniper the 2nd
Inner.Hell
525
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 15:31:00 -
[11] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:No. Maybe
Canadian, EH
MAG vet raven ftw
Pre 1.8 scout don't throw me in with that rift raft
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
2611
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 15:31:00 -
[12] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Harpyja wrote:No. Because what would be the point to investment and dedication to a role if you can max out at least one different role each month? What is the point in investment and dedication to DUST 514?
Those who cannot grasp what Atiim said are obvious CCP fanboys.
R.I.P. Dust 514. You were a beta. May 2014.
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
14921
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 15:37:00 -
[13] - Quote
The reasons why i dont want to see this happen is for the similar reasons why giving 255 million sp for everyone is bad ALSO the hassle of re skilling every month is terrible.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist
\\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
|
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar
Silver Bullet Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY
581
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 15:38:00 -
[14] - Quote
if we are just beta testers why the hell not wtf would it hurt, it worked in mag fine |
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
2615
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 15:42:00 -
[15] - Quote
Since Dust 514 never left the beta stage (according to me and many others) we might as well get max SP on our characters or free respecs.
R.I.P. Dust 514. You were a beta. May 2014.
|
Onesimus Tarsus
703rd Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
2004
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 15:43:00 -
[16] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Harpyja wrote:No. Because what would be the point to investment and dedication to a role if you can max out at least one different role each month? What is the point in investment and dedication to DUST 514? Swear.
Battlefield 1943. Running since 2009. I'm diskinetic, BTW.
Birth, growth, decline, death.
|
Onesimus Tarsus
703rd Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
2004
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 15:45:00 -
[17] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:Atiim wrote:Harpyja wrote:No. Because what would be the point to investment and dedication to a role if you can max out at least one different role each month? What is the point in investment and dedication to DUST 514? Those who cannot grasp what Atiim said are obvious CCP fanboys. Swear.
Battlefield 1943. Running since 2009. I'm diskinetic, BTW.
Birth, growth, decline, death.
|
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar
Silver Bullet Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY
582
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 15:53:00 -
[18] - Quote
there shoulda been a respec for isk/risk augmentation item the whole time, ccp could have made it to where you risk loosing a percentage of your sp with every respec especially with contiued use of the item over short periods of time and it would self balence and be an isk sink, if youset the price right |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
14921
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 16:03:00 -
[19] - Quote
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar wrote:there shoulda been a respec for isk/risk augmentation item the whole time, ccp could have made it to where you risk loosing a percentage of your sp with every respec especially with contiued use of the item over short periods of time and it would self balence and be an isk sink, if youset the price right
As system like that would be massively punishing for veterans who at that point might as well just train up the new tree instead.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist
\\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
2615
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 16:08:00 -
[20] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar wrote:there shoulda been a respec for isk/risk augmentation item the whole time, ccp could have made it to where you risk loosing a percentage of your sp with every respec especially with contiued use of the item over short periods of time and it would self balence and be an isk sink, if youset the price right As system like that would be massively punishing for veterans who at that point might as well just train up the new tree instead.
Wouldnt that actually make sense IWS?
R.I.P. Dust 514. You were a beta. May 2014.
|
|
Awesome Pantaloons
Lokapalas.
482
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 16:16:00 -
[21] - Quote
Withholding respecs is pointless because we all know the inevitable conclusion of this beta. Respecs to test issues is pointless because CCP is no longer concerned with Dust. There are no longer any good arguments for either side.
"The Wrath of God is Immense. His Justice is Swift and Decisive. His Tolerance is Limited."
-The Code of Demeanor
|
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar
Silver Bullet Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY
582
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 16:20:00 -
[22] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar wrote:there shoulda been a respec for isk/risk augmentation item the whole time, ccp could have made it to where you risk loosing a percentage of your sp with every respec especially with contiued use of the item over short periods of time and it would self balence and be an isk sink, if youset the price right As system like that would be massively punishing for veterans who at that point might as well just train up the new tree instead. im fairly certian thatonce you reach a certian amount of sp 45-60 mil is and higher respecing wont really matter much at all and would probly be more trouble than its worth , and if you abuse the system you risk loosing some sp, its notlikeyou cant loose ur sp in eve either all you hard work in sp gone in one instant if the wrong unplaned decision is made |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
2024
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 17:27:00 -
[23] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Harpyja wrote:No. Because what would be the point to investment and dedication to a role if you can max out at least one different role each month? What is the point in investment and dedication to DUST 514?
If you have no intention of playing Legion, really none at all.
But for those of us who will play Legion? Having that SP transfer over will be a nice head start.
Like my ideas?
Pokey Dravon for CPM1
|
Byozuma Kegawa
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
262
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 17:31:00 -
[24] - Quote
Honestly I'd be of the camp of, "Have to reassign my SP AGAIN!?...." because I like where my SP is already. I can see the merits of frequent respecs, but not THAT frequent, even if Dusts days ARE numbered. Assuming they will do updates I think then is the better point to have respecs. |
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar
Silver Bullet Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY
583
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 17:58:00 -
[25] - Quote
it should be a user drivin mechanic completely optional not a mass respec or everyones skills at the same time |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
2025
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 18:27:00 -
[26] - Quote
Im not really a fan of respecs but I understand the community's desire. EVE *sorta* has something like a respec and your character starts off with 2 of them, but after that you only get a new one every 12 months. I think if they wanted to implement some sort of respec system (details pending), it should be an optional respec that happens on a very long time cycle.
Like my ideas?
Pokey Dravon for CPM1
|
A'Real Fury
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
885
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 18:39:00 -
[27] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote: Im not really a fan of respecs but I understand the community's desire. EVE *sorta* has something like a respec and your character starts off with 2 of them, but after that you only get a new one every 12 months. I think if they wanted to implement some sort of respec system (details pending), it should be an optional respec that happens on a very long time cycle.
if only Dust had a long play cycle left in it.
Public Relations - tick tick BOOM.
PSN: CallOfTheDark
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
2025
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 18:41:00 -
[28] - Quote
Considering the fact that Legion doesn't even have approval for funding to go into full production, I think it's unreasonable to be making assumptions about Dust's lifespan at this point.
Like my ideas?
Pokey Dravon for CPM1
|
D legendary hero
Ultramarine Corp
1888
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 18:42:00 -
[29] - Quote
Harpyja wrote:No. Because what would be the point to investment and dedication to a role if you can max out at least one different role each month?
because dust was abandoned by ccp so, there is no point. no role matters, and shotgun scouts make everything pointless
Sou o Defendeiro dos derrubados_Pronto saberá justiça
|
A'Real Fury
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
886
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 21:02:00 -
[30] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote: Considering the fact that Legion doesn't even have approval for funding to go into full production, I think it's unreasonable to be making assumptions about Dust's lifespan at this point.
Taken in isolation that may be true however when you factor in their other statements such as leaving Dust with only bug fixes and a bit of balancing left in its future and the fact that most of the development team has been moved out of Dust to either Eve or Legion does suggest a limited lifespan.
Public Relations - tick tick BOOM.
PSN: CallOfTheDark
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |