|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
KalOfTheRathi
Nec Tributis
1266
   |
Posted - 2014.04.30 18:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
Clone D wrote: --- snip of non-tanker QQ and the whining chorus of LAV drivers ---
We just got rid of you useless Blue Berries. No sense in putting more dead weight back in.
WoT has a crew, virtual BTW just computer bits. That is all we need. Too many Blues stealing tanks because CCP/Shanghai won't implement a squad lock or the EVE based you cannot drive what you are not skilled in to. Now they waste ammo, overheat guns and have no concept of not giving away your position. Blue berries are 99.999% useless, so look in the mirror and realize we do not want You in our tank. I have asked for a switch to kill all the Blues in my tank. Then I can recall it and swap it out. There is no other way to keep random Blues from losing the tanker his ride.
The reason the LAV has a separate gunner is because the LAV needs to haul three people. Now imagine CCP/Shanghai's control schemes being used to control the wildly flipping gyrating LAV, aiming the weapon and firing at the same time. That would never happen.
What would work would be to slow the LAV down to 1/3 the speed of a HAV. They are only 1/4 the size of the tank, that should work and the driver could aim the weapon. Or use his own FG like they have been doing since Dust began. 
Why don't you share what you like to use for weapons, suit and vehicles? Then we could give suggestions and feedback about how to change your game so you suffer, spend tons of ISK and have less fun. Because that would be fun - for us.
And so it goes.
|
KalOfTheRathi
Nec Tributis
1267
|
Posted - 2014.05.01 03:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
Clone D wrote:KalOfTheRathi wrote:... we could give suggestions and feedback about how to change your game so you suffer, spend tons of ISK and have less fun. Because that would be fun - for us. I use a variety of dropsuits and vehicles during play. I play multiple roles, each based on the context of the battle. The dynamic nature of my style ensures copious amounts of creative stimulation. I don' think there's anything that you could do to disrupt my enjoyment of the game. CCP, yes. You, no Also, I have so much ISK that I frequently give it away so that people can enjoy the game more. Do you need any to buy some tanks?
I propose that any Merc with the name Clone D only be able to use One Fit. He must choose it on the first of the month and will not be able to change until the next month. His choices will be from three different fits. They will be a selection established by the QQ Kittens on the Forums. Each will have a wildly invalid possible solution and any WP generated from not using the fit Exactly as these selfsame QQ Kittens demand will be removed at server shut down each day. SP generated by such WP will be removed at the same time. If the SP goes negative then an SP interest fee will be charged for each 1/10 of a match played. Not playing matches will double the SP interest.
Now we would be on level ground. The one you want to put tankers on.
In the course of a day's play I find a few squads that are useful. Not many. True much of that could be improved by CCP/Shanghai logging into a clue server, a clue server - any clue server, and not spend their time trying to over react to their latest Gank.
I don't need your ISK.
I would like CCP/Shanghai to price the ADS to a more reasonable level. Since I have been learning to fly it has been expensive. And unjustly so. I don't mind the price of tanks and my suits but ADS pricing is just ridiculous. As such I have no expectations that they will do the right thing as they can rarely do anything - much less what is right. 
And so it goes.
|
KalOfTheRathi
Nec Tributis
1271
|
Posted - 2014.05.01 12:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:In all honesty how many HAV do you think you will see if Tankers have to fully rely on another random players, or corp mate to fulfill a fundamental role?
I would be the final straw for me. One reason I went back into tanks at 1.7 was because I wasn't forced to deal with useless Blue Belles ding donging around in my tank.
I was in squad today and another tanker dropped a three man tank. I gunned but we picked up a random in the squad. The zoid jumps in and before we have barely moved his turret is popping shots everywhere. I had nearly forgotten how much I hated having to suffer the ignorant actions of Random Blues directly.
They come up with stupid ideas because they have suffered a failure of imagination.
Restricting an armored vehicle design 20K centuries in the future to use modern methodologies is simply not understanding the environment we play in. And today we are having the military announce using autonomous piloting of many vehicles so a man on the ground can control it by him self. Not needing a crew at all.
To believe they are bringing a desperately needed solution to a problem they obviously don't understand is typical of these forums.
Welcome to Dust
And so it goes.
|
KalOfTheRathi
Nec Tributis
1273
|
Posted - 2014.05.01 17:10:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mojo XXXIII wrote: --- snip BS ---
A properly balanced game and the enjoyment of ALL players >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lore OR realism
Oddly enough Mojo, that was what I was part of what I saying. I want to enjoy the game. And we finally have the stupidest, most worthless gamers no longer sitting in my tank and I am enjoying the holy Kitten out of that. There is no need to force realism into a science fiction video game about Immortal Mercenaries in Spaaace. So why do it? Just to appease a bunch of worthless fools? Thank you no.
I do not want to go back to having useless sacks of meat in my tank that I paid for. 
How about we agree that any Blue Belle that gets in a tank must pay a 1M ISK fee up front? That would be enjoyable to me and I would put turrets in my tank, run a free suit and drive those idiots deep into the Red Line. And I would enjoy doing it time and again. When I got tired of it, I would drop a tank without turrets and play this silly game with just as much realism as I currently enjoy.
Are my enjoyment parameters clear to you now?
And so it goes.
|
KalOfTheRathi
Nec Tributis
1273
|
Posted - 2014.05.01 17:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Because they fully believe it to be fair.
Infantry = following the status quo.
Tanker = oddball that sat in the corner in class and never talked to anyone. And because they can't destroy a tank with their AR, they feel they have the absolute right, more than vehicle users do, to dictate how vehicles will work.
I don't know if you have children but as a parent this is the teenagers view of the world. In parent speak that is because many teenagers have a strong sense of entitlement. Which means nothing more than they want everything to be about them because they think of nothing else besides themselves and their enjoyment. It is confusing when others don't agree with their spewing. Poor things. Patience is the key if they are your own as the human brain is not finished being wired up until they are ~25.
Don't forget these same self obsessed twits are the one that got their own AR nerfed so it won't harm an LAV anymore.
And so it goes.
|
|
|
| |
|